Bug#537777: marked as done (error 'aterm: symbol lookup error: aterm: undefined symbol: dpy')

Your message dated Mon, 20 Jul 2009 22:32:22 + with message-id and subject line Bug#53: fixed in aterm 1.0.1-7 has caused the Debian Bug report #53, regarding error 'aterm: symbol lookup error: aterm: undefined symbol: dpy' to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the pro

aterm_1.0.1-7_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: aterm-ml_1.0.1-7_i386.deb to pool/main/a/aterm/aterm-ml_1.0.1-7_i386.deb aterm_1.0.1-7.diff.gz to pool/main/a/aterm/aterm_1.0.1-7.diff.gz aterm_1.0.1-7.dsc to pool/main/a/aterm/aterm_1.0.1-7.dsc aterm_1.0.1-7_i386.deb to pool/main/a/aterm/aterm_1.0.1-7_i386.deb Override entries

Processing of aterm_1.0.1-7_i386.changes

aterm_1.0.1-7_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: aterm_1.0.1-7.dsc aterm_1.0.1-7.diff.gz aterm_1.0.1-7_i386.deb aterm-ml_1.0.1-7_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.o

Processing of aterm_1.0.1-7_i386.changes

aterm_1.0.1-7_i386.changes uploaded successfully to ftp.upload.debian.org along with the files: aterm_1.0.1-7.dsc aterm_1.0.1-7.diff.gz aterm_1.0.1-7_i386.deb aterm-ml_1.0.1-7_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@li

[bts-link] source package licq

# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package licq # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org # remote status report for #338300 # * http://trac.licq.org/ticket/809 # * remote status changed: new -> closed #

Processed: [bts-link] source package licq

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # > # bts-link upstream status pull for source package licq > # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html > # > user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org Setting user to bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org

Bug#535120: marked as done (hk-classes FTBFS with python2.6)

Your message dated Mon, 20 Jul 2009 18:17:06 + with message-id and subject line Bug#535120: fixed in hk-classes 0.8.3-6 has caused the Debian Bug report #535120, regarding hk-classes FTBFS with python2.6 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If

hk-classes_0.8.3-6_amd64.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: hk-classes_0.8.3-6.diff.gz to pool/main/h/hk-classes/hk-classes_0.8.3-6.diff.gz hk-classes_0.8.3-6.dsc to pool/main/h/hk-classes/hk-classes_0.8.3-6.dsc libhk-classes-dev_0.8.3-6_amd64.deb to pool/main/h/hk-classes/libhk-classes-dev_0.8.3-6_amd64.deb libhk-classes-mdb_0.8.3-6_amd64.

Processing of hk-classes_0.8.3-6_amd64.changes

hk-classes_0.8.3-6_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: hk-classes_0.8.3-6.dsc hk-classes_0.8.3-6.diff.gz libhk-classes15ldbl_0.8.3-6_amd64.deb libhk-classes-dev_0.8.3-6_amd64.deb python-hk-classes_0.8.3-6_amd64.deb libhk-classes-mysql_0.8.3-6_amd64.deb

Processing of hk-classes_0.8.3-6_amd64.changes

hk-classes_0.8.3-6_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to ftp.upload.debian.org along with the files: hk-classes_0.8.3-6.dsc hk-classes_0.8.3-6.diff.gz libhk-classes15ldbl_0.8.3-6_amd64.deb libhk-classes-dev_0.8.3-6_amd64.deb python-hk-classes_0.8.3-6_amd64.deb libhk-classes-mysql_0.8.3

Bug#535120: [PATCH] hk-classes FTBFS with python2.6 (test and fix)

tags 535120 + patch thanks Hi, I have tested this patch with python2.5 and python2.6 from experimental, and it builds fine on both python versions. Cheers P.S.- This patch includes previous sent patch. -- Héctor Orón diff -urN hk-classes-0.8.3/debian/patches/python2.6.patch hk-classes-0.8.

Processed: [PATCH] hk-classes FTBFS with python2.6 (test and fix)

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 535120 + patch Bug#535120: hk-classes FTBFS with python2.6 Tags were: patch Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs

Bug#521238: stardic: Bus error on AMD64

Dear Aníbal, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote: > On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 09:47:28PM +0200, Andrew Lee wrote: >> On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 04:20:13AM +1000, Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote: >>> Andrew, could you create a pseudo binary package named stardic in your >>> source package stardict in such a way

Processed: reassign, merge

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 537683 libafterimage0 Bug#537683: aterm: doesn't start; fails to build from source Bug reassigned from package `aterm' to `libafterimage0'. > severity 537683 grave Bug#537683: aterm: doesn't start; fails to build from source Severity set

Bug#537683: reassign, merge

reassign 537683 libafterimage0 severity 537683 grave merge 537683 537548 thanks Hi, Also xwrap.h dropped the declaration for the dpy variable, 2.2.8-2 has xwrap.h:extern Display *dpy; This makes aterm (and others, probably) FTBFS. This is an API change that should either be reverted or properly

Bug#537683: aterm: doesn't start; fails to build from source

Package: aterm Version: 1.0.1-6 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Hi, aterm fails to start: % aterm aterm: symbol lookup error: aterm: undefined symbol: dpy And fails to build: ../../src/main.c: In function 'main': ../../src/main.c:2171: error: 'dpy' undeclared (first use in this function