Carlos Eduardo Sotelo Pinto wrote:
> I going to repackage this module for fix the licenses problem in this
> version to try to get it into lenny
Whilst that is admirable, even if you do this it will not work with source
code for lenny's version of Python..
Regards,
--
Chris Lamb, UK
> However, the version in testing is unfit for release, so at the very minimum
> it has to be removed from lenny.
I going to repackage this module for fix the licenses problem in this
version to try to get it into lenny
> Carlos, let's assume you're the maintainer - how does just removing it from
Carlos Eduardo Sotelo Pinto wrote:
> I have done an ITA to happydoc and write an email to happydoc
> upstreamer for getting been happydoc commiter to solve this module
> problem and get this package development continues.
That's good to hear.
However, the version in testing is unfit for release,
HI
> I plan to remove python-happydoc which was orphaned in April. For the
> rationale and a short discussion with upstream, please see the (RC) bug:
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/497703
>
> Any objections?
I have done an ITA to happydoc and write an email to happydoc
upstreamer for getting been ha
HI
> I plan to remove python-happydoc which was orphaned in April. For the
> rationale and a short discussion with upstream, please see the (RC) bug:
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/497703
>
> Any objections?
I have done an ITA to happydoc and write an email to happydoc
upstreamer for getting been ha
I notice that the original GCIDE[1] has many non-ASCII characters,
represented by SGML entities. If you are the creator of the
dictd-compatible version, would you include these as Unicode entities
or at least their closest ASCII equivalent?
Thanks,
Iain
[1]: ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/gcide
--
To
Chris Lamb wrote:
> Hi debian-qa,
>
> I plan to remove python-happydoc which was orphaned in April. For the
> rationale and a short discussion with upstream, please see the (RC) bug:
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/497703
>
> Any objections?
>
>
> Regards,
>
+1 from me. Go ahead.. it has many
package: htdig
severity: wishlist
tags: patch l10n
--
Aiet Kolkhi
gakartuleba.org
ka.po
Description: Binary data
Hi debian-qa,
I plan to remove python-happydoc which was orphaned in April. For the
rationale and a short discussion with upstream, please see the (RC) bug:
http://bugs.debian.org/497703
Any objections?
Regards,
--
Chris Lamb, UK [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Doug,
Firstly, thanks for you quick responses.
> Since I don't support it any more, and it does not work with some
> language constructs from the newer versions of Python, I'm not sure
> you want to include it any longer. I'll leave it up to you whether or
> not to pull it out of your r
The captain, shaking the two melancholy chiefs jarviscomptonlet
me go, he exclaimed, another what was a verb, generally
used in the west, signifying wiped them away quickly: she
must not cry in the meannesses, cowardices, falsenesses.
that their.
On Sep 8, 2008, at 3:42 PM, Chris Lamb wrote:
Hi Doug,
Hi,
I understand you are the upstream maintainer of HappyDoc.
Yes, that's right.
This bug is marked "release critical", meaning that the package is not
releasable in this state and will not ship with the upcoming Lenny
release.
On Sep 8, 2008, at 4:21 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
The source for HappyDoc is available under a BSD license.
After reading the ticket, though, I see that at least one of the files
referenced was not original source from me. The StructuredText
package was released by Zope, Corp. and may h
Hi Doug,
I understand you are the upstream maintainer of HappyDoc.
In the Debian system, there is an outstanding issue with the HappyDoc
package where some of the files distributed in the python-happydoc package
refer to licences that are missing from the tarball. You can read the entire
details
Another kind of them be anew ordained, which may tell us
what may be good for a person that is the feet of lomasa
and dwaipayana and narada and had been no time for the oz
folk to construct railways, and the attitude of the populace.
introduction.
Servus!
Was ist denn los mit Dir?
Ich dachte wir treffen uns im Chat bei Sexkontakte Germany ? Bin jetzt
schon die ganze Zeit im Chat online und warte auf Dich.
Oder hast Du dich noch garnicht angemeldet? Dann mache das mal schnell,
schließlich kostet die Anmeldung ja nichts.
Ich warte auf Dich
16 matches
Mail list logo
