Quoting Chris Lamb ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> tags 475885 + patch
> thanks
>
> > htdig, after installation, creates db files in /etc/htdig, with a total
> > of 6M!
>
> Patch attached. Alas, there is no seperate ./configure flag for these types
> of files.
As htdig is orphaned, I think that anyone c
Hi,
Could you give the instruction how to make snacc (bbn-7.0.1)?
I have try to download 1.3bbn-7.0.1, run patch -p1 < xxx.diff under
snacc directory, is it right?
then run ./configure, but failed, it seems that script has some problem.
looking forward to your help.
Hanson
tags 475980 + patch
thanks
Patch attached.
Regards,
--
Chris Lamb, UK [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG: 0x634F9A20
diff -urNad caudium-1.4.9.1.orig/src/cmods/module_makefile.in
caudium-1.4.9.1/src/cmods/mod
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 475980 + patch
Bug#475980: caudium: FTBFS: mhash.c:28:26: error: caudium_util.h: No such file
or directory
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug trackin
Your message dated Tue, 15 Apr 2008 00:15:06 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line divine has been removed from Debian, closing #122412
has caused the Debian Bug report #122412,
regarding Wish: init scripts
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Tue, 15 Apr 2008 00:15:03 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line divine has been removed from Debian, closing #436770
has caused the Debian Bug report #436770,
regarding divine: not handling nostrip build option (policy 10.1)on sid/i386
to be marked as done.
tags 475885 + patch
thanks
> htdig, after installation, creates db files in /etc/htdig, with a total
> of 6M!
Patch attached. Alas, there is no seperate ./configure flag for these types
of files.
Regards,
--
Chris Lamb, UK [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 475885 + patch
Bug#475885: htdig: Creates db files in /etc
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bug
Your message dated Mon, 14 Apr 2008 23:21:22 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line rtlinux has been removed from Debian, closing #146975
has caused the Debian Bug report #146975,
regarding rtlinux: error in doc-base file
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that th
Your message dated Mon, 14 Apr 2008 23:21:22 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line rtlinux has been removed from Debian, closing #297711
has caused the Debian Bug report #297711,
regarding New upstream version available
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Mon, 14 Apr 2008 23:21:22 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line rtlinux has been removed from Debian, closing #99590
has caused the Debian Bug report #99590,
regarding rtlinux: Missing symlinks for some man pages
to be marked as done.
This means that you cl
Your message dated Mon, 14 Apr 2008 23:21:22 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line rtlinux has been removed from Debian, closing #297713
has caused the Debian Bug report #297713,
regarding INSTALL mentioned in README.Debian does not exist
to be marked as done.
This means that
Your message dated Mon, 14 Apr 2008 23:21:22 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line rtlinux has been removed from Debian, closing #297712
has caused the Debian Bug report #297712,
regarding rtlinux doesn't seem prepared for kernel-package
to be marked as done.
This means that
Accepted:
selinux-basics_0.3.2.dsc
to pool/main/s/selinux-basics/selinux-basics_0.3.2.dsc
selinux-basics_0.3.2.tar.gz
to pool/main/s/selinux-basics/selinux-basics_0.3.2.tar.gz
selinux-basics_0.3.2_all.deb
to pool/main/s/selinux-basics/selinux-basics_0.3.2_all.deb
Override entries for your
selinux-basics_0.3.2_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
selinux-basics_0.3.2.dsc
selinux-basics_0.3.2.tar.gz
selinux-basics_0.3.2_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubs
Your message dated Mon, 14 Apr 2008 23:47:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#475977: fixed in ipband 0.7.2-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #475977,
regarding ipband: FTBFS: ipband.h:264: error: expected identifier or '(' before
'__extension__'
to be marked as don
Your message dated Mon, 14 Apr 2008 23:47:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#255351: fixed in ipband 0.7.2-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #255351,
regarding ipband: please depend on exim4 instead of exim
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the p
Your message dated Mon, 14 Apr 2008 23:47:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#420272: fixed in ipband 0.7.2-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #420272,
regarding ipband: please depend on exim4 instead of exim
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the p
Your message dated Mon, 14 Apr 2008 23:47:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#420272: fixed in ipband 0.7.2-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #420272,
regarding ipband: please take care of exim 3 going away
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pr
Your message dated Mon, 14 Apr 2008 23:47:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#255351: fixed in ipband 0.7.2-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #255351,
regarding ipband: please take care of exim 3 going away
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pr
Accepted:
ipband_0.7.2-5.diff.gz
to pool/main/i/ipband/ipband_0.7.2-5.diff.gz
ipband_0.7.2-5.dsc
to pool/main/i/ipband/ipband_0.7.2-5.dsc
ipband_0.7.2-5_i386.deb
to pool/main/i/ipband/ipband_0.7.2-5_i386.deb
Override entries for your package:
ipband_0.7.2-5.dsc - source net
ipband_0.7.2-5_
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.25
> forcemerge 420272 255351
Bug#420272: ipband: please take care of exim 3 going away
Bug#255351: ipband: please depend on exim4 instead of exim
Forcibly Merged 255351 420272.
>
End of
ipband_0.7.2-5_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
ipband_0.7.2-5.dsc
ipband_0.7.2-5.diff.gz
ipband_0.7.2-5_i386.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Conta
Accepted:
gtkglarea5-dev_1.2.3-3_amd64.deb
to pool/main/g/gtkglarea/gtkglarea5-dev_1.2.3-3_amd64.deb
gtkglarea5_1.2.3-3_amd64.deb
to pool/main/g/gtkglarea/gtkglarea5_1.2.3-3_amd64.deb
gtkglarea_1.2.3-3.diff.gz
to pool/main/g/gtkglarea/gtkglarea_1.2.3-3.diff.gz
gtkglarea_1.2.3-3.dsc
to pool
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
gtkglarea5_1.2.3-3_amd64.deb: package says section is devel, override says libs.
Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think
the override is correct and the package
gtkglarea_1.2.3-3_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
gtkglarea_1.2.3-3.dsc
gtkglarea_1.2.3-3.diff.gz
gtkglarea5-dev_1.2.3-3_amd64.deb
gtkglarea5_1.2.3-3_amd64.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTE
Rejected: No Checksums-sha1: field in .changes file
Rejected: No Checksums-sha256: field in .changes file
===
If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the
override file requires editing, reply to this email.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "
gtkglarea_1.2.3-3_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
gtkglarea_1.2.3-3.dsc
gtkglarea_1.2.3-3.diff.gz
gtkglarea5-dev_1.2.3-3_amd64.deb
gtkglarea5_1.2.3-3_amd64.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTE
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>
> Package: edenmath.app
> Version: 1.1.1a-5
> Severity: serious
> User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080413 qa-ftbfs
> Justification: FTBFS on i386
> > gs_make CFLAGS="-g -O2"
> > make: invalid option -- O
> > make: invalid option -- 2
Many thanks for the repo
Hola como estas ??
Esta semana en Acqua -Juana Manso 305-Pto madero
No podes faltar a los mejores Jueves de Bs as
Este Jueves cocktail SIN CARGO ( Pizzas, empanadas, Canapes, sandwiches) e
INGRESO FREE desde las 22.30 hs para vos y tus
amigos/as-te reservo un lugar para estar sentad
Your message dated Mon, 14 Apr 2008 18:25:07 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line krecord has been removed from Debian, closing #458635
has caused the Debian Bug report #458635,
regarding krecord: FTBFS: sound.h:45: error: expected `)' before '*' token
to be marked as done.
Package: netdude
Version: 0.3.3-5
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080413 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.3
Package: edenmath.app
Version: 1.1.1a-5
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080413 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gc
Package: ipband
Version: 0.7.2-4
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080413 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.3 i
-Header: caudium 2:1.4.9.1-5 / Mon Apr 14 01:26:01 +0200 2008
> Automatic build of caudium_2:1.4.9.1-5 on bordereau-4.bordeaux.grid5000.fr by
> sbuild/amd64 0.57.0
> Build started at 20080414-0126
> **
> Faile
35 matches
Mail list logo
