Package: lineakd
Version: 1:0.9-3
Severity: wishlist
Please add key definitions for a Dell Precision M90 laptop.
--8<---cut here---start->8---
[DELL-M90]
brandname = "Dell"
modelname = "Precision M90"
[KEYS]
Mute|Unmute = 160
VolumeDown =
Accepted:
cvsdelta_1.7.0-4.diff.gz
to pool/main/c/cvsdelta/cvsdelta_1.7.0-4.diff.gz
cvsdelta_1.7.0-4.dsc
to pool/main/c/cvsdelta/cvsdelta_1.7.0-4.dsc
cvsdelta_1.7.0-4_all.deb
to pool/main/c/cvsdelta/cvsdelta_1.7.0-4_all.deb
Override entries for your package:
cvsdelta_1.7.0-4.dsc - source d
cvsdelta_1.7.0-4_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
cvsdelta_1.7.0-4.dsc
cvsdelta_1.7.0-4.diff.gz
cvsdelta_1.7.0-4_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troubl
Package: hanterm-xf
Severity: minor
The package description refers to xfonts-bakemuk. Shouldn't it be
xfonts-baekmuk?
Jens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Sat, 04 Aug 2007 19:32:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#434165: fixed in camstream 0.26.3+dfsg-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Your message dated Sat, 04 Aug 2007 21:28:06 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#433537: fixed in libglade 1:0.17-8+b1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Accepted:
camstream-doc_0.26.3+dfsg-5_all.deb
to pool/main/c/camstream/camstream-doc_0.26.3+dfsg-5_all.deb
camstream_0.26.3+dfsg-5.diff.gz
to pool/main/c/camstream/camstream_0.26.3+dfsg-5.diff.gz
camstream_0.26.3+dfsg-5.dsc
to pool/main/c/camstream/camstream_0.26.3+dfsg-5.dsc
camstream_0.26.
camstream_0.26.3+dfsg-5_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
camstream_0.26.3+dfsg-5.dsc
camstream_0.26.3+dfsg-5.diff.gz
camstream-doc_0.26.3+dfsg-5_all.deb
camstream_0.26.3+dfsg-5_i386.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Your message dated Sat, 04 Aug 2007 20:56:17 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#435623: fixed in gtktalog 1:1.0.4-6+b1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Sat, 04 Aug 2007 20:49:57 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#388334: fixed in adonthell 0.3.4.cvs.20050813-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the ca
Your message dated Sat, 04 Aug 2007 18:32:19 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#393419: fixed in vpim 0.360.dfsg-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 434566 acpi-support 0.90-2
Bug#434566: seem to be a dependency of acpi-support
Bug reassigned from package `toshset' to `acpi-support'.
> severity 434566 normal
Bug#434566: seem to be a dependency of acpi-support
Severity set to `normal' from
reassign 434566 acpi-support 0.90-2
severity 434566 normal
merge 410918 434566
thanks
Nadav Kavalerchik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> while trying to remove this package (i don't have toshiba laptop)
> synaptic (apt) is complaining that it must remove acpi-support too.
>
> i don't think it should
Accepted:
libvpim-ruby1.8_0.360.dfsg-1_all.deb
to pool/main/v/vpim/libvpim-ruby1.8_0.360.dfsg-1_all.deb
vpim_0.360.dfsg-1.diff.gz
to pool/main/v/vpim/vpim_0.360.dfsg-1.diff.gz
vpim_0.360.dfsg-1.dsc
to pool/main/v/vpim/vpim_0.360.dfsg-1.dsc
vpim_0.360.dfsg.orig.tar.gz
to pool/main/v/vpim/vp
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
libvpim-ruby1.8_0.360.dfsg-1_all.deb: package says section is interpreters,
override says libs.
Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think
the override is correct
vpim_0.360.dfsg-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
vpim_0.360.dfsg-1.dsc
vpim_0.360.dfsg.orig.tar.gz
vpim_0.360.dfsg-1.diff.gz
libvpim-ruby1.8_0.360.dfsg-1_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTEC
Your message dated Sat, 04 Aug 2007 18:12:30 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Sat, 04 Aug 2007 18:12:30 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Sat, 04 Aug 2007 16:17:08 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#432733: fixed in openggsn 0.84-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Sat, 04 Aug 2007 18:12:30 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Sat, 04 Aug 2007 18:12:30 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Sat, 04 Aug 2007 18:12:30 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Sat, 04 Aug 2007 18:12:30 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Sat, 04 Aug 2007 18:12:30 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Sat, 04 Aug 2007 18:14:51 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Sat, 04 Aug 2007 18:12:30 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Sat, 04 Aug 2007 18:12:30 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Sat, 04 Aug 2007 18:12:30 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Sat, 04 Aug 2007 18:12:30 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Sat, 04 Aug 2007 18:12:30 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Sat, 04 Aug 2007 18:12:30 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Sat, 04 Aug 2007 18:12:30 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Sat, 04 Aug 2007 18:12:30 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Sat, 04 Aug 2007 18:12:30 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Accepted:
openggsn-dev_0.84-3_i386.deb
to pool/main/o/openggsn/openggsn-dev_0.84-3_i386.deb
openggsn_0.84-3.diff.gz
to pool/main/o/openggsn/openggsn_0.84-3.diff.gz
openggsn_0.84-3.dsc
to pool/main/o/openggsn/openggsn_0.84-3.dsc
openggsn_0.84-3_i386.deb
to pool/main/o/openggsn/openggsn_0.84
Your message dated Sat, 04 Aug 2007 16:02:10 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#435512: fixed in netdude 0.3.3-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Sat, 04 Aug 2007 17:56:28 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
openggsn_0.84-3_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
openggsn_0.84-3.dsc
openggsn_0.84-3.diff.gz
openggsn-dev_0.84-3_i386.deb
openggsn_0.84-3_i386.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subje
Your message dated Sat, 04 Aug 2007 17:56:28 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Sat, 04 Aug 2007 16:02:10 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#356514: fixed in netdude 0.3.3-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Sat, 04 Aug 2007 17:56:28 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Sat, 04 Aug 2007 17:56:28 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Sat, 04 Aug 2007 17:56:28 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Accepted:
libnetdude_0.3.3-4_i386.deb
to pool/main/n/netdude/libnetdude_0.3.3-4_i386.deb
netdude-dev_0.3.3-4_i386.deb
to pool/main/n/netdude/netdude-dev_0.3.3-4_i386.deb
netdude_0.3.3-4.diff.gz
to pool/main/n/netdude/netdude_0.3.3-4.diff.gz
netdude_0.3.3-4.dsc
to pool/main/n/netdude/netdud
Your message dated Sat, 04 Aug 2007 17:49:17 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line netdude: FTBFS: /usr/include/linux/if_fddi.h:88: error:
expected specifier-qualifier-list before '__be16'
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Sat, 04 Aug 2007 17:52:02 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
netdude_0.3.3-4_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
netdude_0.3.3-4.dsc
netdude_0.3.3-4.diff.gz
netdude_0.3.3-4_i386.deb
netdude-dev_0.3.3-4_i386.deb
libnetdude_0.3.3-4_i386.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> merge 435201 435993
Bug#435201: htdig: cron.daily script fails noisily when package is not installed
Bug#435993: htdig: crontest failure lockfile-create: command not found
Bug#435316: /etc/cron.daily/htdig: line 3: lockfile-create: command not found
Mer
Package: htdig
Version: 1:3.2.0b6-3.1
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: cron-qa-20070804
Hi,
it seems that htdig cron files are giving output when the package itself is
removed
(REMOVE) or its dependencies (AUTOREMOVE).
log available at:
http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/collab-qa/crontest/2007-08-04
49 matches
Mail list logo
