Bug#427743: marked as done (flac123 - FTBFS: checking for FLAC__file_decoder_new in -lFLAC... no)

Your message dated Sun, 17 Jun 2007 20:47:07 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#427743: fixed in flac123 0.0.9-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#426642: marked as done (FLAC 1.1.4 is coming, library transition imminent)

Your message dated Sun, 17 Jun 2007 20:47:07 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#427743: fixed in flac123 0.0.9-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Processed (with 1 errors): notforwarded 427198

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > package tex-guy Ignoring bugs not assigned to: tex-guy > notforwarded 427198 Bug#427198: tex-guy - FTBFS: /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -ldvilib2 Removed annotation that Bug had been forwarded to Hirotsugu Kakugawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. > done Unknown comm

flac123_0.0.9-5_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: flac123_0.0.9-5.diff.gz to pool/main/f/flac123/flac123_0.0.9-5.diff.gz flac123_0.0.9-5.dsc to pool/main/f/flac123/flac123_0.0.9-5.dsc flac123_0.0.9-5_i386.deb to pool/main/f/flac123/flac123_0.0.9-5_i386.deb Override entries for your package: flac123_0.0.9-5.dsc - source sound fla

Processing of flac123_0.0.9-5_i386.changes

flac123_0.0.9-5_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: flac123_0.0.9-5.dsc flac123_0.0.9-5.diff.gz flac123_0.0.9-5_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? C

Soyez à l'heure !

Pour visualiser la version en ligne cliquez ici http://tr1.bp12.net/r5.aspx?GV1=ASP104Z004AI0005I20008MVA000789ZO http://tr1.bp12.net/r5.aspx?GV1=ASP104Z004AI0005I20008MV2000789ZO Offres spéciale fête des pères N°3 Paris le Dimanche 2 Jui

Bug#429191: flyspray phpmailer: not relevant for stable

On Sun Jun 17, 2007 at 18:20:01 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > For stable I've checked whether it's > vulnerable and I believe it's not: the vulnerability is in the SendmailSend() > function. That requires for the calling code to actually use the sendmail > method, which Flyspray does not allo

Bug#429191: flyspray phpmailer: not relevant for stable

Hi all, > A security bug has been discovered in PHPMailer: > | PHPMailer 1.7, when configured to use sendmail, allows remote > | attackers to execute arbitrary shell commands via shell metacharacters > | in the SendmailSend function in class.phpmailer.php > >

Bug#429195: marked as done ([CVE-2007-3215] remote shell command injection in PHPMailer)

Your message dated Sun, 17 Jun 2007 15:32:02 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#429191: fixed in flyspray 0.9.8-12 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#375294: marked as done (class.jabber.php , now it is a package in debian unstable.)

Your message dated Sun, 17 Jun 2007 15:32:02 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#375294: fixed in flyspray 0.9.8-12 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#429191: marked as done ([CVE-2007-3215] remote shell command injection in PHPMailer)

Your message dated Sun, 17 Jun 2007 15:32:02 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#429191: fixed in flyspray 0.9.8-12 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#429338: marked as done (Needs to use libphp-phpmailer)

Your message dated Sun, 17 Jun 2007 15:32:02 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#429338: fixed in flyspray 0.9.8-12 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Processed: Re: Bug#427592: workbone: FTBFS: /usr/include/bits/ustat.h:26: error: redefinition of 'struct ustat'

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > block 427592 by 429064 Bug#429064: linux-libc-dev: conflicts with Bug#427592: workbone: FTBFS: /usr/include/bits/ustat.h:26: error: redefinition of 'struct ustat' Was not blocked by any bugs. Blocking bugs of 427592 added: 429064 > thanks Stopping p

Bug#376667: marked as done (graphviz not found by flyspray)

Your message dated Sun, 17 Jun 2007 15:32:02 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#376667: fixed in flyspray 0.9.8-12 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#427592: workbone: FTBFS: /usr/include/bits/ustat.h:26: error: redefinition of 'struct ustat'

block 427592 by 429064 thanks Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 16/06/07 at 20:18 +0300, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote: >> The i386 buildd seems not have a problem with it. >> >> Note that I just orphaned this package, see #429178. > > Maybe the i386 buildd is still using linux-kern

flyspray_0.9.8-12_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: flyspray_0.9.8-12.diff.gz to pool/main/f/flyspray/flyspray_0.9.8-12.diff.gz flyspray_0.9.8-12.dsc to pool/main/f/flyspray/flyspray_0.9.8-12.dsc flyspray_0.9.8-12_all.deb to pool/main/f/flyspray/flyspray_0.9.8-12_all.deb Override entries for your package: flyspray_0.9.8-12.dsc - s

Processing of flyspray_0.9.8-12_i386.changes

flyspray_0.9.8-12_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: flyspray_0.9.8-12.dsc flyspray_0.9.8-12.diff.gz flyspray_0.9.8-12_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tro

Bug#427592: workbone: FTBFS: /usr/include/bits/ustat.h:26: error: redefinition of 'struct ustat'

On 16/06/07 at 20:18 +0300, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote: > On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 08:12:34AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > Justification: FTBFS on i386 > > The i386 buildd seems not have a problem with it. > > Note that I just orphaned this package, see #429178. Maybe the i386 buildd is sti

hx_0.7.14-8_powerpc.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: hx_0.7.14-8.diff.gz to pool/main/h/hx/hx_0.7.14-8.diff.gz hx_0.7.14-8.dsc to pool/main/h/hx/hx_0.7.14-8.dsc hx_0.7.14-8_powerpc.deb to pool/main/h/hx/hx_0.7.14-8_powerpc.deb Override entries for your package: hx_0.7.14-8.dsc - source net hx_0.7.14-8_powerpc.deb - optional net An

Processing of hx_0.7.14-8_powerpc.changes

hx_0.7.14-8_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: hx_0.7.14-8.dsc hx_0.7.14-8.diff.gz hx_0.7.14-8_powerpc.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EM

Bug#429338: Needs to use libphp-phpmailer

Package: flyspray Severity: serious Your package includes a copy of PHPMailer, which also is packaged as libphp-phpmailer in the archive. You need to fix your package to use the system-wide library. Otherwise it requires too much overhead whenever a vulnerability in PHPMailer is found. (like right