Bug#419494: myphpmoney: prerm problem

Package: myphpmoney Version: 1.3RC3+dfsg-2 Severity: normal hello impossible to remove --purge myphpmoney. when prerm apache2 don't start -- System Information: Debian Release: 4.0 APT prefers stable APT policy: (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Ke

Bug#418660: texmacs: Depends on tetex-base, tetex-bin, tetex-extra

$cat texlive.patch Because of the wrapping of long lines, the previous 'cat texlive.patch' did not come out correctly. So I am attaching it in this email. hth raju -- Kamaraju S Kusumanchi http://www.people.cornell.edu/pages/kk288/ http://malayamaarutham.blogspot.com/ texlive.patch Descrip

Bug#407360: maintain libapache2-mod-auth-mysql

http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=407360 i need that package for a customer of mine (David, in carbon copy)... ok, i'll maintain it tell me where to start from... i'm new to debian maintenance policies -- Guido Serra aka Zeph http://guidoserra.it +39 348 4313 992 sistemista e

plplot_5.6.1-11_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: libcsiro0_5.6.1-11_i386.deb to pool/main/p/plplot/libcsiro0_5.6.1-11_i386.deb libplplot-c++9c2_5.6.1-11_i386.deb to pool/main/p/plplot/libplplot-c++9c2_5.6.1-11_i386.deb libplplot-dev_5.6.1-11_i386.deb to pool/main/p/plplot/libplplot-dev_5.6.1-11_i386.deb libplplot-fortran9_5.6.1-1

vbs_1.4.0-10_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: vbs_1.4.0-10.diff.gz to pool/main/v/vbs/vbs_1.4.0-10.diff.gz vbs_1.4.0-10.dsc to pool/main/v/vbs/vbs_1.4.0-10.dsc vbs_1.4.0-10_i386.deb to pool/main/v/vbs/vbs_1.4.0-10_i386.deb Override entries for your package: vbs_1.4.0-10.dsc - source electronics vbs_1.4.0-10_i386.deb - option

Bug#415278: marked as done (FTBFS with GCC 4.3: unrecognized command line option "-fno-force-mem")

Your message dated Sun, 15 Apr 2007 20:32:11 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#415278: fixed in plplot 5.6.1-11 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#417738: marked as done (FTBFS with GCC 4.3: missing #includes)

Your message dated Sun, 15 Apr 2007 20:32:16 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#417738: fixed in vbs 1.4.0-10 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Processing of plplot_5.6.1-11_i386.changes

plplot_5.6.1-11_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: plplot_5.6.1-11.dsc plplot_5.6.1-11.diff.gz plplot-doc_5.6.1-11_all.deb libplplot9_5.6.1-11_i386.deb libplplot-dev_5.6.1-11_i386.deb libplplot-c++9c2_5.6.1-11_i386.deb libplplot-fortran9_5.6.1-11_i38

Processing of vbs_1.4.0-10_i386.changes

vbs_1.4.0-10_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: vbs_1.4.0-10.dsc vbs_1.4.0-10.diff.gz vbs_1.4.0-10_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAI

Bug#417746: marked as done (FTBFS with GCC 4.3: missing #includes)

Your message dated Sun, 15 Apr 2007 17:32:07 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#417746: fixed in unalz 0.55-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

unalz_0.55-4_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: unalz_0.55-4.diff.gz to pool/main/u/unalz/unalz_0.55-4.diff.gz unalz_0.55-4.dsc to pool/main/u/unalz/unalz_0.55-4.dsc unalz_0.55-4_i386.deb to pool/main/u/unalz/unalz_0.55-4_i386.deb Override entries for your package: unalz_0.55-4.dsc - source utils unalz_0.55-4_i386.deb - option

Processing of unalz_0.55-4_i386.changes

unalz_0.55-4_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: unalz_0.55-4.dsc unalz_0.55-4.diff.gz unalz_0.55-4_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAI

Bug#410466: marked as done (splitmail: segmentation fault)

Your message dated Sun, 15 Apr 2007 16:47:03 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#410466: fixed in metamail 2.7-53 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

metamail_2.7-53_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: metamail_2.7-53.diff.gz to pool/main/m/metamail/metamail_2.7-53.diff.gz metamail_2.7-53.dsc to pool/main/m/metamail/metamail_2.7-53.dsc metamail_2.7-53_i386.deb to pool/main/m/metamail/metamail_2.7-53_i386.deb Override entries for your package: metamail_2.7-53.dsc - source mail m

Processing of metamail_2.7-53_i386.changes

metamail_2.7-53_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: metamail_2.7-53.dsc metamail_2.7-53.diff.gz metamail_2.7-53_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? C

Processed: severity wishlist for 254015

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 254015 wishlist Bug#254015: cl-regex: Documentation Severity set to `wishlist' from `normal' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs da

Processed: Re: Bug#418660: texmacs: Depends on tetex-base, tetex-bin, tetex-extra

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 418660 + patch Bug#418660: texmacs: Depends on tetex-base, tetex-bin, tetex-extra There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (ad

Bug#418660: texmacs: Depends on tetex-base, tetex-bin, tetex-extra

tags 418660 + patch thanks The following patch removes all the dependencies on tetex-* and moves them to texlive-* . The package builds fine under pbuilder with this patch. I am not sure if the new dependencies are bloated, but atleast I am sure that they work. hth raju $cat texlive.patch diff

Bug#418660: texmacs: Depends on tetex-base, tetex-bin, tetex-extra

On Sun, Apr 15, 2007 at 12:26:40AM -0400, Kamaraju Kusumanchi wrote: > tags 418660 + patch > thanks > > > The following patch removes all the dependencies on tetex-* and moves > them to texlive-* . The package builds fine under pbuilder with this > patch. I am not sure if the new dependencies are

Processing of tclmagick_0.45-4_i386.changes

tclmagick_0.45-4_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: tclmagick_0.45-4.dsc tclmagick_0.45-4.diff.gz tclmagick_0.45-4_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troubl

tclmagick_0.45-4_i386.changes REJECTED

Rejected: tclmagick_0.45-4.dsc refers to tclmagick_0.45.orig.tar.gz, but I can't find it in the queue or in the pool. === If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the override file requires editing, reply to this email. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a

Processed: xkeysw-config removed; no longer blocks #368515

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > unblock 368515 by 368519 Bug#368519: libgtk1.2 is obsolete, please port to gnome-python Bug#368515: Removal of libgtk1.2 python bindings (meta-bug) Was blocked by: 368519 368521 368523 368524 368527 411938 Blocking bugs of 368515 removed: 368519 > End

Processing of tclmagick_0.45-4_i386.changes

tclmagick_0.45-4_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: tclmagick_0.45-4.dsc tclmagick_0.45.orig.tar.gz tclmagick_0.45-4.diff.gz tclmagick_0.45-4_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a sub

Processing of emms_2.1-3_i386.changes

emms_2.1-3_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: emms_2.1-3.dsc emms_2.1-3.diff.gz emms_2.1-3_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTEC

emms_2.1-3_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: emms_2.1-3.diff.gz to pool/main/e/emms/emms_2.1-3.diff.gz emms_2.1-3.dsc to pool/main/e/emms/emms_2.1-3.dsc emms_2.1-3_i386.deb to pool/main/e/emms/emms_2.1-3_i386.deb Override entries for your package: emms_2.1-3.dsc - source sound emms_2.1-3_i386.deb - optional sound Announcin

tclmagick_0.45-4_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: tclmagick_0.45-4.diff.gz to pool/main/t/tclmagick/tclmagick_0.45-4.diff.gz tclmagick_0.45-4.dsc to pool/main/t/tclmagick/tclmagick_0.45-4.dsc tclmagick_0.45-4_i386.deb to pool/main/t/tclmagick/tclmagick_0.45-4_i386.deb tclmagick_0.45.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/t/tclmagick/tclmagick

Bug#347405: marked as done (tclmagick: pulls in spurious deps from Magick-config)

Your message dated Sun, 15 Apr 2007 11:02:03 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#347405: fixed in tclmagick 0.45-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#395683: marked as done (emms: missing binary-indep target in debian/rules (Policy 4.9))

Your message dated Sun, 15 Apr 2007 11:02:02 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#395683: fixed in emms 2.1-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your re

Bug#252760: FTBFS: architecture missing

Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi, > I don't really understand your bugreport please help me a > bit :) > You write that the package fails to build from source (I > guess on amd64) but you want amd64 to be added to the > Architectures field. > So does it build and work on amd64 or not?

Processing of tramp_2.0.55-1_i386.changes

tramp_2.0.55-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: tramp_2.0.55-1.dsc tramp_2.0.55.orig.tar.gz tramp_2.0.55-1.diff.gz tramp_2.0.55-1_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "un

Processing of mkrboot_0.95_i386.changes

mkrboot_0.95_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: mkrboot_0.95.dsc mkrboot_0.95.tar.gz mkrboot_0.95_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL

tramp_2.0.55-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: tramp_2.0.55-1.diff.gz to pool/main/t/tramp/tramp_2.0.55-1.diff.gz tramp_2.0.55-1.dsc to pool/main/t/tramp/tramp_2.0.55-1.dsc tramp_2.0.55-1_all.deb to pool/main/t/tramp/tramp_2.0.55-1_all.deb tramp_2.0.55.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/t/tramp/tramp_2.0.55.orig.tar.gz Override entri

Bug#252760: FTBFS: architecture missing

Hi, no it suggests them and since they are not needed to run mkrboot... Kind regards Nico -- Nico Golde - http://ngolde.de - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - GPG: 0x73647CFF For security reasons, all text in this mail is double-rot13 encrypted. pgpRZPpxY73wQ.pgp Description: PGP signature

mkrboot_0.95_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: mkrboot_0.95.dsc to pool/main/m/mkrboot/mkrboot_0.95.dsc mkrboot_0.95.tar.gz to pool/main/m/mkrboot/mkrboot_0.95.tar.gz mkrboot_0.95_i386.deb to pool/main/m/mkrboot/mkrboot_0.95_i386.deb Override entries for your package: mkrboot_0.95.dsc - source admin mkrboot_0.95_i386.deb - op

Bug#252760: marked as done (FTBFS: architecture missing)

Your message dated Sun, 15 Apr 2007 14:02:02 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#252760: fixed in mkrboot 0.95 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#407212: Where is tixwish?

retitle 407212 tixwish(1) man page should be removed severity 407212 normal thanks Ian Wienand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I really don't know much about Tcl, etc, but I'm looking for the > 'tixwish' program to run a Tcl script I have. This package includes a > man page for it, but not the act

Processed: Re: Bug#407212: Where is tixwish?

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 407212 tixwish(1) man page should be removed Bug#407212: Where is tixwish? Changed Bug title to tixwish(1) man page should be removed from Where is tixwish?. > severity 407212 normal Bug#407212: tixwish(1) man page should be removed Severity s