Bug#403598: Correction : a little typo

2006-12-18 Thread d'Artagnan
To make a good comparison of output, we (of course) need to compare access.log.[0-9].gz with gunzip files from access.log.2.gz to access.log.9.gz So we have : $gnump3d-top --last -logfiles=/var/log/gnump3d/access.log.2.gz /var/log/gnump3d/access.log.3.gz /var/log/gnump3d/access.log.4.gz /var/

Bug#403598: gnump3d-top produces wrong statistics when --logfiles option is used.

2006-12-18 Thread d'Artagnan
Package: gnump3d Version: 2.9.9.9-2 When I activate the option --logfiles=/var/log/gnump3d/access.log* in /etc/gnump3d/gnump3d.conf to enable statistics on all log files processed by logrotate, the "View the most recent tracks served." web page displays wrong statistics. Here you can show

Bug#389163: How to handle filename conflict "aleph" (Packages aleph, tetex-bin, texlive-bin)?

2006-12-18 Thread Norbert Preining
On Mon, 18 Dez 2006, Frank Küster wrote: > No, we don't have any problems (for etch): > > - aleph has been removed and will probably be reintroduced as afnix Good. > - octave uses /usr/bin/mex2.1 True, I already have removed the conflict some time ago, but forgot it ;-) > We should, however, c

Processed: Re: Bug#400923: gdm: $DISPLAY variable not set

2006-12-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 400923 multi-gnome-terminal: $DISPLAY variable not set from the > --display argument Bug#400923: gdm: $DISPLAY variable not set Changed Bug title. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracki

Bug#400923: gdm: $DISPLAY variable not set

2006-12-18 Thread Mohammed Sameer
retitle 400923 multi-gnome-terminal: $DISPLAY variable not set from the --display argument thanks I've just rebuilt the package. Forgot to close a bug. -- GNU/Linux registered user #224950 Proud Egyptian GNU/Linux User Group Member. Life powered by Debian, Homepage: www.foolab.org -- Don't sen

Bug#389163: How to handle filename conflict "aleph" (Packages aleph, tetex-bin, texlive-bin)?

2006-12-18 Thread Frank Küster
Norbert Preining <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sam, 16 Dez 2006, Frank Küster wrote: >> > THis name change is currently under discussion in the tex-live >> > (upstream) mailing list with the original authors participating. As soon >> > as we have come to a conclusion there it will be executed in

Bug#402902: marked as done (secpanel: should depend on openssh-client instead of ssh ?)

2006-12-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 18 Dec 2006 08:32:04 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#402902: fixed in secpanel 0.41+0.4.2-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

secpanel_0.41+0.4.2-3_amd64.changes ACCEPTED

2006-12-18 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: secpanel_0.41+0.4.2-3.diff.gz to pool/main/s/secpanel/secpanel_0.41+0.4.2-3.diff.gz secpanel_0.41+0.4.2-3.dsc to pool/main/s/secpanel/secpanel_0.41+0.4.2-3.dsc secpanel_0.41+0.4.2-3_all.deb to pool/main/s/secpanel/secpanel_0.41+0.4.2-3_all.deb Override entries for your package: s