SHEMLALE Outdoor In Byikini Pcosing & Taeasing

2006-12-14 Thread David Donaldson
And all your future lies beneath your hat. Salut! http://old.bonwafphyll.com/ Muscled LADYBOOY Svqueezing Big Tsits On Sofa -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#403150: cmail: Please add a depends against emacsen or emacs-snapshot

2006-12-14 Thread arnaud
Package: cmail Hello, Your package depends only on *emacs21, which makes it uninstallable for emacs-snapshot. Please add emacsen to Depends if cmail works with every flavors of emacs (see the debian emacs policy[0]) or at least emacs-snapshot. This bug, as a part of a mass bug filing, may be a f

Bug#302764: #302764 [FIXED xawtv 3.95-1]: 'man fbtv' typo: "availabile"

2006-12-14 Thread A. Costa
Package: fbtv Version: 3.95.dfsg.1-1 Followup-For: Bug #302764 This typo's still there: % dlocate -s fbtv | grep Ver ; man fbtv | grep -n "availabile" Version: 3.95.dfsg.1-1 101: modes availabile. The file containing the videomodes is normally named HTH... -- System Inform

Bug#403159: trr19: Please add a depends against emacsen or emacs-snapshot

2006-12-14 Thread arnaud
Package: trr19 Hello, Your package depends only on *emacs21, which makes it uninstallable for emacs-snapshot. Please add emacsen to Depends if trr19 works with every flavors of emacs (see the debian emacs policy[0]) or at least emacs-snapshot. This bug, as a part of a mass bug filing, may be a f

Bug#102006: lates DVD movies of the highest quality

2006-12-14 Thread Louise Bowman
Apply yourself. Get all the education you can, but then, by God, do something. Don't just stand there, make it happen. What do sad complaints avail if the offense is not cut down by punishment. berologu3.net Universal pass. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "

Processed: retitle 262471 oaf: man page missing for oaf-client

2006-12-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 262471 oaf: man page missing for oaf-client Bug#262471: Manual for oaf-client Changed Bug title. > tag 262471 patch Bug#262471: oaf: man page missing for oaf-client There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > End of message, stopping processin

Processed: tag 399677 patch

2006-12-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 399677 patch Bug#399677: patch for incorrect mimedecode case-sensitivity There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (adm

Processed: reassign 402445 cegui-mk2 0.4.1-1.3

2006-12-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 402445 cegui-mk2 0.4.1-1.3 Bug#402445: cegui-mk2: Please upgrade to version 0.5 Bug reassigned from package `cegui-mk2' to `cegui-mk2'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking

=?KOI8-R?Q?=F5=CC=D5=DE=DB=C5=CE=C9=C5_=CB=C1=DE=C5=D3=D4=D7=C1_=D3=CF=D4=CF=D7=CF=CA_=

2006-12-14 Thread Cristina Spencer
=D3=D7=D1=DA=C9?= Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 17:12:45 -0180 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_NextPart_000_0007_01C71FBC.37FCB710" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3155.0 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOL

Bug#292092: marked as done (libgnome-dev)

2006-12-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 14 Dec 2006 16:26:53 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Returned mail: see transcript for details has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is n

Processed: reassign 377118 libgnome2-0

2006-12-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # libgnome2-0 isn't built from gnome-libs. Please reassign if appropriate. > reassign 377118 libgnome2-0 Bug#377118: Bug in gnomelibs? Bug reassigned from package `gnome-libs' to `libgnome2-0'. > retitle 377118 Font rendering problem Bug#377118: Bug i

Processed: forcemerge 153039 309164

2006-12-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 153039 gnome-libs 1.4.1.7-2 Bug#153039: libgnome-dev: rebuild with newer libdb-dev Bug reassigned from package `libgnome-dev' to `gnome-libs'. > forcemerge 153039 309164 Bug#153039: libgnome-dev: rebuild with newer libdb-dev Bug#309164: gnome-

Processed: found 303465 1.2.1-3

2006-12-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > found 303465 1.2.1-3 Bug#303465: Cannot load modules on hppa (and likely also alpha) Bug marked as found in version 1.2.1-3. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrato

Bug#393084: marked as done (FTBFS (alpha): too few arguments to function 'bfd_hash_table_init'/invalid lvalue)

2006-12-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 14 Dec 2006 12:32:09 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#393084: fixed in lush 1.2.1-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

lush_1.2.1-3_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2006-12-14 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: lush-library_1.2.1-3_all.deb to pool/main/l/lush/lush-library_1.2.1-3_all.deb lush_1.2.1-3.diff.gz to pool/main/l/lush/lush_1.2.1-3.diff.gz lush_1.2.1-3.dsc to pool/main/l/lush/lush_1.2.1-3.dsc lush_1.2.1-3_i386.deb to pool/main/l/lush/lush_1.2.1-3_i386.deb Override entries for

Processing of lush_1.2.1-3_i386.changes

2006-12-14 Thread Archive Administrator
lush_1.2.1-3_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: lush_1.2.1-3.dsc lush_1.2.1-3.diff.gz lush-library_1.2.1-3_all.deb lush_1.2.1-3_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsub

Bug#350409: marked as done (lush: creates lush-library in binary-arch)

2006-12-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 14 Dec 2006 13:07:10 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#350409: fixed in lush 1.2-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your re

Bug#367872: FTBFS (alpha): too few arguments to function 'bfd_hash_table_init'/invalid lvalue

2006-12-14 Thread Matej Vela
Falk Hueffner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] > dldbfd.c: In function 'alphaelf_init_got_info': > dldbfd.c:1518: error: too few arguments to function 'bfd_hash_table_init' Upstream applied the patch from #367872 in 1.2.1, so this part is fixed. > dldbfd.c: In function 'alphaelf_create_got': >

Processed: Re: reassign

2006-12-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # 395892 is a clone of 395867, closing this copy > close 395892 Bug#395892: pycocumo doesn't work with python-pmw built for python2.4 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug closed, send any further explanations to M

Bug#402943: marked as done (x10: [INTL:de] initial German debconf translation)

2006-12-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 14 Dec 2006 08:32:20 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#402943: fixed in x10 1.06-15 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

x10_1.06-15_amd64.changes ACCEPTED

2006-12-14 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: x10_1.06-15.diff.gz to pool/main/x/x10/x10_1.06-15.diff.gz x10_1.06-15.dsc to pool/main/x/x10/x10_1.06-15.dsc x10_1.06-15_amd64.deb to pool/main/x/x10/x10_1.06-15_amd64.deb Override entries for your package: x10_1.06-15.dsc - source electronics x10_1.06-15_amd64.deb - optional el