Processed: merging 229595 387754

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21 > merge 229595 387754 Bug#229595: enscript: doesn't support utf8 / not unicode-ready Bug#387754: /usr/bin/enscript: support UTF-8 Merged 229595 387754. > End of message, stopping proce

Bug#147116: marked as done (enscript: Ruby enscript syntax highlighting)

Your message dated Sat, 07 Oct 2006 15:47:18 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#147116: fixed in enscript 1.6.4-10 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#276219: marked as done (enscript: Wrong grammar on output)

Your message dated Sat, 07 Oct 2006 15:47:18 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#276219: fixed in enscript 1.6.4-10 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#287880: marked as done (Regenerate font.map on installation)

Your message dated Sun, 8 Oct 2006 01:22:21 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#287880: Regenerate font.map on installation has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#339938: marked as done (enscript: Wrapped function lists in ChangeLog files are not highlighted properly)

Your message dated Sat, 07 Oct 2006 15:47:18 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#339938: fixed in enscript 1.6.4-10 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#344750: marked as done (enscript: [PATCH] do _not_ include GECOS in .ps by default. Add --with-gecos option)

Your message dated Sat, 07 Oct 2006 15:47:18 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#344750: fixed in enscript 1.6.4-10 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#287880: Regenerate font.map on installation

tags 287880 + moreinfo thanks Re: Michael Fedrowitz 2005-01-10 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > I've got an extra font installed for enscript and everytime the package > > is upgraded, the font.map is replaced by the default one causing > > enscript to not find the extra font and print the escaped octal va

Processed: tagging 147116

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21 > tags 147116 + patch Bug#147116: enscript: Ruby enscript syntax highlighting Tags were: upstream Tags added: patch > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if yo

Processed: Re: Bug#287880: Regenerate font.map on installation

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 287880 + moreinfo Bug#287880: Regenerate font.map on installation There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator,

Processed: updating and synchronizing my bug submitter addresses

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > submitter 385765 ! Bug#385765: sanitizer Recommends: procmail only Changed Bug submitter from Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. > submitter 385771 ! Bug#385771: pyg Suggests: procmail only Changed Bug submitter from J