The package description for qla2x00-source says it is for 2.4 kernels
only. 2.4 kernels are being removed from etch, so I'm thinking this
should be removed too?
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: friendly suggestion for htdig
Followup-For: Bug #89041
Package: htdig
*** Please type your report below this line ***
I'd like to make a friendly suggestion for htdig for Etch. I think it
would be a good idea to include a note about external parsers in the
htdig.conf file (which did exi
Package: htdig
Followup-For: Bug #89041
I'd like to make a friendly suggestion for htdig for Etch. I think it
would be a good idea to include a note about external parsers in the
htdig.conf file (which did exist in the Sarge version of htdig).
I spent a few good hours, messing around with the
Your message dated Mon, 04 Sep 2006 15:02:15 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#384544: fixed in mmx-emu 0.6-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Andreas Teuchert wrote:
> When rsjog is started under X it exits with the following error:
> /usr/bin/rsjog:71:in `initialize': uninitialized constant
> Gtk::WINDOW_TOPLEVEL (NameError)
> from /usr/bin/rsjog:599
There are more problems than this one. `Gtk::WINDOW_TOPLEVEL' should
be repla
Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe a écrit :
On Sat, Sep 02, 2006 at 11:48:15AM -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
From: Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This bug has been fixed in version 3.95-4, closing it.
Hm, do you probably have an idea why especially the arm and i386
v
On Sat, Sep 02, 2006 at 11:48:15AM -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> From: Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> This bug has been fixed in version 3.95-4, closing it.
Hm, do you probably have an idea why especially the arm and i386
versions are not yet built?
Tha
mmx-emu_0.6-6_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
mmx-emu_0.6-6.dsc
mmx-emu_0.6-6.diff.gz
mmx-emu_0.6-6_i386.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [
Accepted:
mmx-emu_0.6-6.diff.gz
to pool/main/m/mmx-emu/mmx-emu_0.6-6.diff.gz
mmx-emu_0.6-6.dsc
to pool/main/m/mmx-emu/mmx-emu_0.6-6.dsc
mmx-emu_0.6-6_i386.deb
to pool/main/m/mmx-emu/mmx-emu_0.6-6_i386.deb
Override entries for your package:
mmx-emu_0.6-6.dsc - source libs
mmx-emu_0.6-6_i386
obconf_1.5-4_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
obconf_1.5-4.dsc
obconf_1.5-4.diff.gz
obconf_1.5-4_i386.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAI
Accepted:
obconf_1.5-4.diff.gz
to pool/main/o/obconf/obconf_1.5-4.diff.gz
obconf_1.5-4.dsc
to pool/main/o/obconf/obconf_1.5-4.dsc
obconf_1.5-4_i386.deb
to pool/main/o/obconf/obconf_1.5-4_i386.deb
Override entries for your package:
obconf_1.5-4.dsc - source x11
obconf_1.5-4_i386.deb - optio
Your message dated Mon, 04 Sep 2006 05:32:16 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#311816: fixed in libtk-img 1:1.3-15
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
libtk-img_1.3-15_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
libtk-img_1.3-15.dsc
libtk-img_1.3-15.diff.gz
libtk-img_1.3-15_i386.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troubl
Accepted:
libtk-img_1.3-15.diff.gz
to pool/main/libt/libtk-img/libtk-img_1.3-15.diff.gz
libtk-img_1.3-15.dsc
to pool/main/libt/libtk-img/libtk-img_1.3-15.dsc
libtk-img_1.3-15_i386.deb
to pool/main/libt/libtk-img/libtk-img_1.3-15_i386.deb
Override entries for your package:
libtk-img_1.3-15.
Your message dated Mon, 04 Sep 2006 04:02:08 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#383383: fixed in apollon 1.0.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
15 matches
Mail list logo