Your message dated Fri, 28 Jul 2006 05:25:37 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Fri, 28 Jul 2006 05:25:37 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Fri, 28 Jul 2006 05:25:37 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Fri, 28 Jul 2006 05:25:37 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Fri, 28 Jul 2006 05:25:37 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Fri, 28 Jul 2006 05:22:53 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Fri, 28 Jul 2006 05:22:53 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Fri, 28 Jul 2006 05:25:37 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Fri, 28 Jul 2006 04:27:38 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Patch included
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to r
severity 379892 normal
tags 379892 upstream wontfix
stop
On Wednesday 26 July 2006 04:07, Laurent Bonnaud wrote:
> Package: htdig
> Version: 1:3.2.0b6-1
> Severity: important
>
> in /etc/htdig/htdig.conf one reads:
>
> start_url: http://www.htdig.org/
>
> If the Debian admin does not
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 379892 normal
Bug#379892: default config crawls the htdig.org website
Severity set to `normal' from `important'
> tags 379892 upstream wontfix
Bug#379892: default config crawls the htdig.org website
There were no tags set.
Tags added: upstream
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:
kimberlite |1.1.0-4 | source, alpha, amd64, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, m68k,
mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc
kimberlite-doc |1.1.0-4 | all
Note that the package(s) have simply been
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:
installwatch |0.6.3-2 | hurd-i386
installwatch | 0.7.0beta4-2 | source, alpha, amd64, arm, hppa, i386, ia64,
m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc
Note that the package(s) have sim
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:
mgapdesk | 1.00.7beta-6 | source, i386
Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag
database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug.
The package(s
Anibal,
You did the last upload, do you mind if I take care of this?
Petr Salinger wrote:
> It needs to restrict fbdev support only for Linux archs.
> Please find attached patch with that.
--
ยท''`. Policy is your friend. Trust the Policy.
: :' : Love the Policy. Obey the Policy
Your message dated Thu, 27 Jul 2006 05:32:04 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#380066: fixed in libggi 1:2.2.1-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Package: libggi
Severity: important
Version: 1:2.2.1-2
Tags: patch
Hi,
the current version fails to build on GNU/kFreeBSD.
It needs to restrict fbdev support only for Linux archs.
Please find attached patch with that.
Thanks in advance
Petrdiff -u libggi-2.2.1/debian/
Your message dated Thu, 27 Jul 2006 10:02:39 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line ITA: swedish -- The Swedish dictionary for ispell
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
18 matches
Mail list logo
