Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> block 368515 by 368514
Bug#368515: Removal of libgtk1.2 python bindings (meta-bug)
Was not blocked by any bugs.
Blocking bugs added: 368514
> block 368515 by 368518
Bug#368515: Removal of libgtk1.2 python bindings (meta-bug)
Was blocked by: 368514
Bloc
On Mon, May 22, 2006, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> The icepref and iceme packages are long obsolete and dead upstream.
> They are also orphaned. I expressed and intent to adopt a while back to
> replace them with icewmcp (which I was intending to package), since I
> was going to use them in a deplo
Loïc Minier wrote:
>
> This only shows xkeysw-config, gnome-tasksel, sql-editor, scigraphica,
> pydict, icepref, iceme, and gaby. This is quite reasonable.
>
The icepref and iceme packages are long obsolete and dead upstream.
They are also orphaned. I expressed and intent to adopt a while ba
Package: iceme
Severity: normal
Hi,
libgtk1.2 being completely obsolete, it is time to think of the removal
of the libgtk1.2 Python bindings. Since this package currently depends
on them I suggest a port to gnome-python.
Bye,
--
Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"You can gtk_main_ru
Package: icepref
Severity: normal
Hi,
libgtk1.2 being completely obsolete, it is time to think of the removal
of the libgtk1.2 Python bindings. Since this package currently depends
on them I suggest a port to gnome-python.
Bye,
--
Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"You can gtk_main_
Package: python-gnome
Severity: important
Hi,
I wish we could stop shipping the Python bindings for libgtk1.2.
(libgtk1.2 being completely obsolete)
The rdepends show:
bee% apt-cache rdepends python-gdk-imlib-1.2 python-gtk-1.2 python-glade-1.2
python-gnome-1.2
python-glade-1.2
Reve
Your message dated Mon, 22 May 2006 04:47:07 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#266080: fixed in xcircuit 3.6.24-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Mon, 22 May 2006 04:47:07 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#262321: fixed in xcircuit 3.6.24-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Accepted:
xcircuit_3.6.24-1.diff.gz
to pool/main/x/xcircuit/xcircuit_3.6.24-1.diff.gz
xcircuit_3.6.24-1.dsc
to pool/main/x/xcircuit/xcircuit_3.6.24-1.dsc
xcircuit_3.6.24-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/x/xcircuit/xcircuit_3.6.24-1_i386.deb
xcircuit_3.6.24.orig.tar.gz
to pool/main/x/xcircuit/xcircu
xcircuit_3.6.24-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
xcircuit_3.6.24-1.dsc
xcircuit_3.6.24.orig.tar.gz
xcircuit_3.6.24-1.diff.gz
xcircuit_3.6.24-1_i386.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
10 matches
Mail list logo
