metamail_2.7-51_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: metamail_2.7-51.diff.gz to pool/main/m/metamail/metamail_2.7-51.diff.gz metamail_2.7-51.dsc to pool/main/m/metamail/metamail_2.7-51.dsc metamail_2.7-51_i386.deb to pool/main/m/metamail/metamail_2.7-51_i386.deb Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 352482

Bug#353539: marked as done (metamail: [CVE-2006-0709] crashes with very long boundaries in messages)

Your message dated Wed, 22 Feb 2006 15:17:11 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#353539: fixed in metamail 2.7-51 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#352482: marked as done (metamail: [CVE-2006-0709] crashes with very long boundaries in messages)

Your message dated Wed, 22 Feb 2006 15:17:11 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#353539: fixed in metamail 2.7-51 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#353539: marked as done (metamail: [CVE-2006-0709] crashes with very long boundaries in messages)

Your message dated Wed, 22 Feb 2006 15:17:11 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#352482: fixed in metamail 2.7-51 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#352482: marked as done (metamail: [CVE-2006-0709] crashes with very long boundaries in messages)

Your message dated Wed, 22 Feb 2006 15:17:11 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#352482: fixed in metamail 2.7-51 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Processing of metamail_2.7-51_i386.changes

metamail_2.7-51_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: metamail_2.7-51.dsc metamail_2.7-51.diff.gz metamail_2.7-51_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? C

Processing of metamail_2.7-50_i386.changes

metamail_2.7-50_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: metamail_2.7-50.dsc metamail_2.7-50.diff.gz metamail_2.7-50_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? C

metamail_2.7-50_i386.changes REJECTED

Rejected: md5sum and/or size mismatch on existing copy of metamail_2.7-50.dsc. Rejected: metamail_2.7-50_i386.deb: old version (2.7-50) in unstable >= new version (2.7-50) targeted at unstable. Rejected: metamail_2.7-50_i386.deb: old version (2.7-50) in testing >= new version (2.7-50) targeted a

Re: Diskless*

"Tomas Herout" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Please, why diskless* isn't in Debian testing/unstable? It was removed from the archive in September due to a lack of maintenance -- see for details. lessdisks is a reasonable alternative. > Will be it sometimes there?

Processed: retitle 353539 352482 metamail: [CVE-2006-0709] crashes with very long boundaries in messages

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 353539 metamail: [CVE-2006-0709] crashes with very long boundaries in > messages Bug#353539: metamail: crashes with very long filenames in messages Changed Bug title. > retitle 352482 metamail: [CVE-2006-0709] crashes with very long boundaries

Processed: 353539 tags security patch severity serious merge 352482

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 353539 security patch Bug#353539: metamail: crashes with very long filenames in messages Tags were: patch Tags added: security, patch > severity 353539 serious Bug#353539: metamail: crashes with very long filenames in messages Severity set to `ser

Diskless*

Please, why diskless* isn't in Debian testing/unstable? Will be it sometimes there? Have a nice day Tomas Herout

Processed: retitle 352482 to metamail: [CVE-2006-0709.] crashes with very long boundaries in messages

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.15 > retitle 352482 metamail: [CVE-2006-0709.] crashes with very long boundaries > in messages Bug#352482: metamail: crashes with very long boundaries in messages Changed Bug title. > En

Bug#352482: (no subject)

In particular, this is CVE-2006-0709. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: severity 352482 serious

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 352482 serious Bug#352482: metamail: crashes with very long boundaries in messages Severity set to `serious'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrato

Bug#199085: marked as done (falconseye: plays music even if disabled / sound doesn't work)

Your message dated Wed, 22 Feb 2006 18:26:50 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line falconseye: Bugs fixed in 1.9.3-15 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#306762: marked as done (falconseye: Missing manpage for falconseye)

Your message dated Wed, 22 Feb 2006 18:26:50 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line falconseye: Bugs fixed in 1.9.3-15 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#352482: It's a vuln

This is CVE-2006-0709 now. Additionally, Red Hat sound confident that this is exploitable: "This issue is a pretty standard heap based buffer overflow." -- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181665 They have issued a security advisory with severity set to important: https://r