Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 236199 moreinfo unreproducible
Bug#236199: gtkpool: Asian display
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo, unreproducible
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(
tag 236199 moreinfo unreproducible
thanks
Erwan David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Package: gtkpool
> Version: 0.5.0-5
> Severity: normal
>
> In gtkpool, where I once saw "player 1" and "player 2"
> I now get some asian display (whiuch I do not understand)
Is this still a problem for you? Does
Your message dated Sat, 08 Oct 2005 21:37:23 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Sat, 08 Oct 2005 21:37:23 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Sat, 08 Oct 2005 21:37:23 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Sat, 08 Oct 2005 21:37:23 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Sat, 08 Oct 2005 21:37:23 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Sat, 08 Oct 2005 21:37:23 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Sat, 08 Oct 2005 21:33:50 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Sat, 08 Oct 2005 21:31:24 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Sat, 08 Oct 2005 21:31:24 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Sat, 08 Oct 2005 21:33:50 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Sat, 08 Oct 2005 21:37:23 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Sat, 08 Oct 2005 21:31:24 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Sat, 08 Oct 2005 21:33:50 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Sat, 08 Oct 2005 21:37:23 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Sat, 08 Oct 2005 21:37:23 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Sat, 08 Oct 2005 21:37:23 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Sat, 08 Oct 2005 21:37:23 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Sat, 08 Oct 2005 21:37:23 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Sat, 08 Oct 2005 21:31:24 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Sat, 08 Oct 2005 21:37:23 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Sat, 08 Oct 2005 21:37:23 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Sat, 08 Oct 2005 21:33:50 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Sat, 08 Oct 2005 21:37:23 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Accepted:
gfax_0.4.2-12.diff.gz
to pool/main/g/gfax/gfax_0.4.2-12.diff.gz
gfax_0.4.2-12.dsc
to pool/main/g/gfax/gfax_0.4.2-12.dsc
gfax_0.4.2-12_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gfax/gfax_0.4.2-12_i386.deb
Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org
Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
gfax_0.4.2-12_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
gfax_0.4.2-12.dsc
gfax_0.4.2-12.diff.gz
gfax_0.4.2-12_i386.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [
Accepted:
python-gdk-imlib-1.2_0.6.12-4_i386.deb
to pool/main/p/python-gnome/python-gdk-imlib-1.2_0.6.12-4_i386.deb
python-glade-1.2_0.6.12-4_i386.deb
to pool/main/p/python-gnome/python-glade-1.2_0.6.12-4_i386.deb
python-gnome-1.2_1.4.5-4_i386.deb
to pool/main/p/python-gnome/python-gnome-1.2
Your message dated Sat, 08 Oct 2005 10:32:09 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#326514: fixed in python-gnome 1.4.5-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Sat, 08 Oct 2005 10:32:09 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#311852: fixed in python-gnome 1.4.5-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Sat, 08 Oct 2005 10:32:09 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#253749: fixed in python-gnome 1.4.5-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
python-gnome_1.4.5-4_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
python-gnome_1.4.5-4.dsc
python-gnome_1.4.5-4.diff.gz
python-gnome-1.2_1.4.5-4_i386.deb
python-gtk-1.2_0.6.12-4_i386.deb
python-glade-1.2_0.6.12-4_i386.deb
python-gdk-imlib-1.2_0.6.12-4_i386.deb
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:
login.app | 1.2.1-18 | source, alpha, arm, hppa, hurd-i386, i386, ia64,
m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc
Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag
database
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:
cantus | 1.07-2 | hurd-i386
cantus | 1.07-3 | source, alpha, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, m68k, mips,
mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc
Note that the package(s) have simply been remo
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:
gupsc |0.3.1-5 | source, alpha, arm, hppa, hurd-i386, i386, ia64,
m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc
Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag
database
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:
chastity-list | 0.5.20020928-9 | source, all
Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag
database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug.
The packa
Accepted:
gtktalog_1.0.4-4.diff.gz
to pool/main/g/gtktalog/gtktalog_1.0.4-4.diff.gz
gtktalog_1.0.4-4.dsc
to pool/main/g/gtktalog/gtktalog_1.0.4-4.dsc
gtktalog_1.0.4-4_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gtktalog/gtktalog_1.0.4-4_i386.deb
Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org
Thank you fo
gtktalog_1.0.4-4_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
gtktalog_1.0.4-4.dsc
gtktalog_1.0.4-4.diff.gz
gtktalog_1.0.4-4_i386.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troubl
Accepted:
x-ttcidfont-conf_20.dsc
to pool/main/x/x-ttcidfont-conf/x-ttcidfont-conf_20.dsc
x-ttcidfont-conf_20.tar.gz
to pool/main/x/x-ttcidfont-conf/x-ttcidfont-conf_20.tar.gz
x-ttcidfont-conf_20_all.deb
to pool/main/x/x-ttcidfont-conf/x-ttcidfont-conf_20_all.deb
Announcing to debian-devel-c
x-ttcidfont-conf_20_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
x-ttcidfont-conf_20.dsc
x-ttcidfont-conf_20.tar.gz
x-ttcidfont-conf_20_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscrib
Your message dated Sat, 08 Oct 2005 09:17:04 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#332780: fixed in x-ttcidfont-conf 20
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Sat, 08 Oct 2005 09:17:04 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#331495: fixed in x-ttcidfont-conf 20
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Package: x-ttcidfont-conf
Version: 19
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch l10n
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.13.2
Locale: L
Hoi Bas,
> Here are some words that seem to be missing from the dutch
> wordlist/spellchecker (taken from my ~/.aspell.dutch.pws):
I'm updating the 'dutch' package and looked into your suggestions.
> - uitprodukt
This is misspelled, should be "uitproduct", and is jargon (see below).
> - veelge
Accepted:
gtkhx_0.9.4-3.dsc
to pool/main/g/gtkhx/gtkhx_0.9.4-3.dsc
gtkhx_0.9.4-3.tar.gz
to pool/main/g/gtkhx/gtkhx_0.9.4-3.tar.gz
gtkhx_0.9.4-3_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gtkhx/gtkhx_0.9.4-3_i386.deb
Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org
Closing bugs: 332759
Thank you for your
Your message dated Sat, 08 Oct 2005 06:17:09 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#332759: fixed in gtkhx 0.9.4-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
gtkhx_0.9.4-3_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
gtkhx_0.9.4-3.dsc
gtkhx_0.9.4-3.tar.gz
gtkhx_0.9.4-3_i386.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [E
Package: gtkhx
Version: 0.9.4-2
Severity: important
Hello,
The current version of gtkhx fails to build on GNU/kFreeBSD,
because of outdated config.guess and config.sub.
The versions of config.guess and config.sub in gtkhx are too
old to correctly support Debian GNU/k*BSD. A version is needed
48 matches
Mail list logo
