libtangram-perl_2.08-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: libtangram-perl_2.08-1.diff.gz to pool/main/libt/libtangram-perl/libtangram-perl_2.08-1.diff.gz libtangram-perl_2.08-1.dsc to pool/main/libt/libtangram-perl/libtangram-perl_2.08-1.dsc libtangram-perl_2.08-1_all.deb to pool/main/libt/libtangram-perl/libtangram-perl_2.08-1_all.deb li

Bug#329275: haskelldb-bin: Uninstallable, libgmp3 not available in sid anymore.

Package: haskelldb-bin Version: 0.9.cvs.601-6 Severity: grave Hi, This package is currently uninstallable in sid because it still depends on libgmp3 which has been replaced by libgmp3c2 because of the C++ ABI transition. Since ghc6 is installable again, I think a simple rebuid should take care o

Processing of libtangram-perl_2.08-1_i386.changes

libtangram-perl_2.08-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: libtangram-perl_2.08-1.dsc libtangram-perl_2.08.orig.tar.gz libtangram-perl_2.08-1.diff.gz libtangram-perl_2.08-1_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#325387: libtool: some options available in documentation are not usable under AMD64

On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 09:30:21PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > Hi, > > I do not see the static option you mention in libtool's --help > nor in any documentation. I have no idea where your question > comes from. Maybe I should clarify myself, of course it has those options. And it's show them by:

Bug#325387: libtool: some options available in documentation are not usable under AMD64

Hi, I do not see the static option you mention in libtool's --help nor in any documentation. I have no idea where your question comes from. Could you please describe why you think there is any bug? Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?

Bug#121201: Condominium Closing Statement 1pb57

Dear Homeownner, You have been pre-approveed for a $739,000 Homee Looan at an Introductory APR OF 3.6% This Second M0rtgagge is being extended to you unconditionally and your credit is in no way a factor. To take Advantage of this Limited Time opportunity All we ask is that you visit our We

Bug#287704: marked as done ([l10n] Initial Czech translation of zope-cmfworkflow debconf messages)

Your message dated Tue, 20 Sep 2005 10:04:08 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#287704: fixed in zope-cmfworkflow 0.4.2-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#225769: marked as done (zope-cmfworkflow: Japanese po-debconf template translation (ja.po))

Your message dated Tue, 20 Sep 2005 10:03:00 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#225769: fixed in zope-cmfworkflow 0.4.2-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#248958: marked as done (zope-cmfworkflow: clicking on the portal workflow then contents tab and then on transitions tab of any workflow, and then clicking on any transition's name, like "hide" for example raises an unauthorized exception and the message is "You are not allowed to access getPermissionsText in this context")

Your message dated Tue, 20 Sep 2005 09:53:26 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Closing duplicate has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility t

Bug#329181: aspell-nl: fails to interface properly to emacs

Package: aspell-nl Version: 1:0.1e-37 Severity: normal Hello, aspell-nl is not properly interfaced with emacs, it does not appear in the list under tools->Spell checking. I already posted a fix to this problem, but here it is again: 1) extract the file idutch from package idutch, found under