Your message dated Mon, 19 Sep 2005 14:47:31 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#265005: fixed in libtool 1.5.20-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Mon, 19 Sep 2005 14:47:31 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#219490: fixed in libtool 1.5.20-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 318543 + fixed
Bug#318543: libcorba-orbit-perl: FTBFS: static declaration of 'get_typecode'
follows non-static declaration
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug t
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 12:09:45PM +0200, Matej Vela wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 11:56:52AM +0200, Laurent Fousse wrote:
> > * Matej Vela [Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 11:10:09AM +0200]:
> > > Let's see what the developers think. Is cabot ready for etch, or
> > > should we wait until someone
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forwarded 40623 http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=86343
Bug#40623: vgrind doesn't appear to generate a proper index
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=86343.
(By the way, this Bug is
Moi!
If you've been bored of too few library transitions as of late, I've got
one here to cheer you up. As some of you are already painfully aware of,
recent versions of imagemagick provided a changed ABI with respect to
sarge without changing the library soname. See also #318176, #320029,
#325490
Your message dated Mon, 19 Sep 2005 06:47:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#315710: fixed in sodipodi 0.34-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Mon, 19 Sep 2005 06:47:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#278430: fixed in sodipodi 0.34-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Mon, 19 Sep 2005 06:47:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#278430: fixed in sodipodi 0.34-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Mon, 19 Sep 2005 06:47:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#278430: fixed in sodipodi 0.34-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forwarded 315710 http://sf.net/support/tracker.php?aid=1295416
Bug#315710: sodipodi: Still opens file while pressing Cancel button...
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to
http://sf.net/support/tracker.php?aid=1295416.
>
End of message,
Your message dated Mon, 19 Sep 2005 06:47:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#278430: fixed in sodipodi 0.34-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Accepted:
sodipodi_0.34-2.diff.gz
to pool/main/s/sodipodi/sodipodi_0.34-2.diff.gz
sodipodi_0.34-2.dsc
to pool/main/s/sodipodi/sodipodi_0.34-2.dsc
sodipodi_0.34-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/s/sodipodi/sodipodi_0.34-2_i386.deb
Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org
Closing bugs: 278430
sodipodi_0.34-2_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
sodipodi_0.34-2.dsc
sodipodi_0.34-2.diff.gz
sodipodi_0.34-2_i386.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? C
Re: Matej Vela in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Hi,
> > ist cabot still not ready for testing?
>
> Let's see what the developers think. Is cabot ready for etch, or
> should we wait until someone adopts it?
As one of the caff/signing-party people, I can say that caff serves
the same purpose as cabot, i
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 11:56:52AM +0200, Laurent Fousse wrote:
> * Matej Vela [Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 11:10:09AM +0200]:
> > Let's see what the developers think. Is cabot ready for etch, or
> > should we wait until someone adopts it?
>
> #289417 and #280588 are not going to happen because las
Hi,
* Matej Vela [Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 11:10:09AM +0200]:
> Hello,
>
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 10:44:43AM +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
> > Hi,
> > ist cabot still not ready for testing?
>
> Let's see what the developers think. Is cabot ready for etch, or
> should we wait until someone adopts it?
#
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 11:10:09AM +0200, Matej Vela wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 10:44:43AM +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
> >
> > ist cabot still not ready for testing?
>
> Let's see what the developers think. Is cabot ready for etch, or
> should we wait until someone adopts it?
Nobody stoo
Hello,
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 10:44:43AM +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
> Hi,
> ist cabot still not ready for testing?
Let's see what the developers think. Is cabot ready for etch, or
should we wait until someone adopts it?
Thanks,
Matej
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subje
Hi,
ist cabot still not ready for testing?
Regards Nico
--
Nico Golde - JAB: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GPG: 0x73647CFF
http://www.ngolde.de | http://www.muttng.org | http://grml.org
pgpGsGXrSrQeO.pgp
Description: PGP signature
20 matches
Mail list logo
