Bad news for Cable TV Users

How have you been, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Were Proud to be able to offer you this [2005] CableFilter copy&paste the page between the arrows ->->->-> goodperform.info/ppv <-<-<-<- Bye, Bessie Y. Edwardsd, VI [EMAIL PROTECTED] Do just once what others say you can't do, and you will never pay attentio

tkpaint_1.5.4-7_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: tkpaint_1.5.4-7.diff.gz to pool/main/t/tkpaint/tkpaint_1.5.4-7.diff.gz tkpaint_1.5.4-7.dsc to pool/main/t/tkpaint/tkpaint_1.5.4-7.dsc tkpaint_1.5.4-7_all.deb to pool/main/t/tkpaint/tkpaint_1.5.4-7_all.deb Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 193386 T

Processing of tkpaint_1.5.4-7_i386.changes

tkpaint_1.5.4-7_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: tkpaint_1.5.4-7.dsc tkpaint_1.5.4-7.diff.gz tkpaint_1.5.4-7_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Co

Bug#317078: dict-freedict-deu-eng: missed header 00-database-utf8 in dict files

Package: dict-freedict-deu-eng Version: 1.1-4 Severity: normal An utf-8 dictionary should contain the 00-database-utf8 header inside the dict. I found those lines in the original freedict dictionaries, too. This line is used by the dictd server normally (serpento works with that) to discover, th

secpanel_0.41+0.4.2-2_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: secpanel_0.41+0.4.2-2.diff.gz to pool/main/s/secpanel/secpanel_0.41+0.4.2-2.diff.gz secpanel_0.41+0.4.2-2.dsc to pool/main/s/secpanel/secpanel_0.41+0.4.2-2.dsc secpanel_0.41+0.4.2-2_all.deb to pool/main/s/secpanel/secpanel_0.41+0.4.2-2_all.deb Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lis

Processing of secpanel_0.41+0.4.2-2_i386.changes

secpanel_0.41+0.4.2-2_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: secpanel_0.41+0.4.2-2.dsc secpanel_0.41+0.4.2-2.diff.gz secpanel_0.41+0.4.2-2_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "u

Bug#277690: Please apply proposed fix

On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 03:41:11PM +0200, Harald Welte wrote: > Even though the original codebase might be unclean, and it is uncertain > whether snacc should be replaced by eSnacc, I don't see any reason why > this proposed bugfix is not applied to make the package build. > > Other packages have b

Bug#143952: approximately a hundred

Urgent Announcement: Good Day, I have been instructed by my head office to alert you to the fact that your file has been reviewed and there now are a few potential options for you to consider. Please note that this issue is time sensitive and that your previous credit situation is not an issu