fonter_1.7-9_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2005-04-03 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: fonter_1.7-9.diff.gz to pool/main/f/fonter/fonter_1.7-9.diff.gz fonter_1.7-9.dsc to pool/main/f/fonter/fonter_1.7-9.dsc fonter_1.7-9_i386.deb to pool/main/f/fonter/fonter_1.7-9_i386.deb Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

Processing of fonter_1.7-9_i386.changes

2005-04-03 Thread Archive Administrator
fonter_1.7-9_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: fonter_1.7-9.dsc fonter_1.7-9.diff.gz fonter_1.7-9_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAI

Bug#302931: marked as done (noteedit: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): configure does not allow building with gcc-4.0)

2005-04-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 3 Apr 2005 22:46:08 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#302931: Acknowledgement (noteedit: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): configure does not allow building with gcc-4.0) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim t

Bug#302931: noteedit: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): configure does not allow building with gcc-4.0

2005-04-03 Thread Andreas Jochens
Package: noteedit Version: 2.7.1-2 Severity: normal When building 'noteedit' on amd64/unstable with gcc-4.0, I get the following error: checking for dcopidl... /usr/bin/dcopidl checking for dcopidl2cpp... /usr/bin/dcopidl2cpp checking for mcopidl... /usr/bin/mcopidl checking for artsc-config... /

Bug#302917: noteedit: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): configure does not allow building with gcc-4.0

2005-04-03 Thread Andreas Jochens
Package: noteedit Version: 2.7.1-2 Severity: normal When building 'noteedit' on amd64/unstable with gcc-4.0, I get the following error: checking for dcopidl... /usr/bin/dcopidl checking for dcopidl2cpp... /usr/bin/dcopidl2cpp checking for mcopidl... /usr/bin/mcopidl checking for artsc-config... /

Bug#302447: marked as done (webmin-bind installs in bind subdir not in bind8)

2005-04-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 03 Apr 2005 15:50:19 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#302447: fixed in webmin-virtual-server 2.50-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Any of your friends having Heallth Issues

2005-04-03 Thread Secured Switzerland Pharm
Hi Swiss Pharm, did this ring a bell in your mind? Curious? - read on.. In the heart of Switzerland since 1931. Our online store carries a wide assortment of medicines. With laxed laws we ask no questions & leave the discretion up to the individual. Iron-clad Swiss privacy & security laws allow for

Bug#299158: marked as done (catalog has a spurious dependency on libmysqlclient10)

2005-04-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 3 Apr 2005 13:58:19 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Fwd: Fixed in NMU of catalog 1.03-9 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#282213: marked as done (catalog: Japanese po-debconf template translation (ja.po))

2005-04-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 3 Apr 2005 13:58:19 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Fwd: Fixed in NMU of catalog 1.03-9 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#290574: marked as done (catalog: Pleass add catalan translation of the debconf templates)

2005-04-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 3 Apr 2005 13:58:19 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Fwd: Fixed in NMU of catalog 1.03-9 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#241411: marked as done ([INTL:nl] new Dutch po-debconf translation)

2005-04-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 3 Apr 2005 13:58:19 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Fwd: Fixed in NMU of catalog 1.03-9 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#250825: marked as done (catalog: Please add German translation of the debconf templates)

2005-04-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 3 Apr 2005 13:58:19 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Fwd: Fixed in NMU of catalog 1.03-9 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Processed: Fixed in NMU of catalog 1.03-9

2005-04-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 241411 + fixed Bug#241411: [INTL:nl] new Dutch po-debconf translation Tags were: l10n patch Tags added: fixed > tag 250825 + fixed Bug#250825: catalog: Please add German translation of the debconf templates Tags were: l10n patch Tags added: fixed

Bug#270752: marked as done (FTBFS: wrongfull use of lib64)

2005-04-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 3 Apr 2005 12:22:46 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line qt-embedded-free is removed from unstable has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no