Bug#121621: It doesn`t hurt to check Vickie

2005-02-21 Thread Jasmine Hancock
Thank you for your attention. You have been pre-approved for a new home loan. This offer is unconditional and your credit is in no way a factor. You will find all details below: ___SUMMARY___ Interest: 3.45 Term: 360 months Max Price: $350,000 Closing Date: 30 days Please follow this

Re: ezmlm-idx

2005-02-21 Thread Christoph Berg
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > It would be NICE if one were able to > > build-ezmlm mysql|pgsql|std Hi, if you want to get this fixed, please file a bug report on the package. Read [1] for instructions. [1] http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting Christoph -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] |

Bug#134799: marked as done (fcheck: baseline check chokes on empty directories )

2005-02-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 21 Feb 2005 11:02:08 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#134799: fixed in fcheck 2.7.59-7 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#182847: marked as done (NMU patch for -5.1)

2005-02-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 21 Feb 2005 11:02:08 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#182847: fixed in fcheck 2.7.59-7 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

ezmlm-idx

2005-02-21 Thread cfm
Hi, It would be NICE if one were able to build-ezmlm mysql|pgsql|std best, cfm Package: ezmlm-src Priority: optional Section: non-free/mail Installed-Size: 657 Maintainer: Debian QA Group <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Architecture: all Source: ezmlm -- Christopher F. Miller, Publisher

Bug#97591: marked as done (fcheck cron not guarded)

2005-02-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 21 Feb 2005 11:02:08 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#97591: fixed in fcheck 2.7.59-7 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#295348: marked as done (fcheck: fheck rebuild database during upgrade)

2005-02-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 21 Feb 2005 11:02:08 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#295348: fixed in fcheck 2.7.59-7 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#159478: marked as done (fcheck uses wrong configuration file location)

2005-02-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 21 Feb 2005 11:02:08 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#159478: fixed in fcheck 2.7.59-7 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#105556: marked as done (fcheck: wrong error message if dbf file is not writeable)

2005-02-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 21 Feb 2005 11:02:08 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#105556: fixed in fcheck 2.7.59-7 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#126943: marked as done (fcheck: Patch for Lintian reports)

2005-02-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 21 Feb 2005 11:02:08 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#126943: fixed in fcheck 2.7.59-7 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Heyyy,, your secret admire

2005-02-21 Thread fastmail.fm
Would you like to keep me some company? My Sack of shit husband is out of town and I'm a little lonely. Safe way to contact me: http://www.netazipper.com/d/10.php Regards, Alexis b

Bug#296275: webmin-exim: missing settings or explanation in README.Debian

2005-02-21 Thread Thilo Pfennig
Package: webmin-exim Version: 0.2.6-2 Severity: normal in this module i did not find a setting (paths!) for the location of exim. that's ok, but there should be something about it in README.Debian. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing'