Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 280706
Bug#280706: Please improve the error message given when using relative paths
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> thank you
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Your message dated Wed, 8 Dec 2004 16:08:02 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line autofs: Fails to mount specified mountpoints. No logging
output.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
reopen 280706
severity 280706 wishlist
retitle 280706 Please improve the error message given when using relative paths
thanks
On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 09:46:03PM +0100, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote:
>>> Do not use relative paths or symlinks in auto.master, please.
>> In that case, 280706 is not
Your message dated Wed, 8 Dec 2004 23:00:37 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line autofs: no kernel notifications for a "missing" or unmountable
mount point (e.g. floppy)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has b
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 280706
Bug#280706: autofs: Fails to mount specified mountpoints. No logging output.
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> severity 280706 wishlist
Bug#280706: autofs: Fails to mount specified mountpoints. No logging output.
Severity set to `
On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 01:47:20AM +0100, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 05:31:09PM +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
> > okay. when a floppy drive is accessed, and there happens not to be a
> > floppy in the drive, you get an error "directory does not exist".
> >
On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 01:08:12PM +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 12:16:49PM +0100, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote:
> > Basically the proposed patch needs one more hack:
> > If $dir is not a symlink, readlink returns nothing, so:
> >
> > link=`/bin/readlink -f "
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # These are not the same bugs!
> unmerge 280120
Bug#280120: autofs: Broken parsing on tabs after options
Bug#280234: Another whitespace handling bug - program maps this time
Bug#282981: Autofs breaks if map has not trailing newline
Disconnected #280120
On Thu, Nov 25, 2004 at 08:41:40PM +0100, "Dr. Andreas Krüger" wrote:
> After a recent update, part of my autofs - setup, that used to run
> smoothly, suddenly broke. I had a /etc/auto.something map, intended to
> magically mount a subdirectory of /something, with indeed only a single
> line,
On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 12:16:49PM +0100, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote:
> Basically the proposed patch needs one more hack:
> If $dir is not a symlink, readlink returns nothing, so:
>
> link=`/bin/readlink -f "$dir"`
> if [ "x$link" != "x" ]; then
> dir="$link"
> fi
Eh, it wo
Basically the proposed patch needs one more hack:
If $dir is not a symlink, readlink returns nothing, so:
link=`/bin/readlink -f "$dir"`
if [ "x$link" != "x" ]; then
dir="$link"
fi
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 11:20:19AM +0100, Anders Boström wrote:
> SHG> Take a look at the patch for #280209 -- this is a duplicate, and the
> patch
> SHG> there should help for this bug as well, of course. If it helps people,
> I'll
> SHG> put it into the next upload of autofs.
> The patch in
Your message dated Wed, 8 Dec 2004 12:24:32 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line autofs: Fails to mount specified mountpoints. No logging
output.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 280809 normal
Bug#280809: auto.master "+" syntax doesn't support options
Severity set to `normal'.
> merge 280809 278229
Bug#278229: auto.master "+" syntax doesn't support options
Bug#280809: auto.master "+" syntax doesn't support options
Merg
Accepted:
autofs-hesiod_4.1.3-6_i386.deb
to pool/main/a/autofs/autofs-hesiod_4.1.3-6_i386.deb
autofs-ldap_4.1.3-6_i386.deb
to pool/main/a/autofs/autofs-ldap_4.1.3-6_i386.deb
autofs_4.1.3-6.diff.gz
to pool/main/a/autofs/autofs_4.1.3-6.diff.gz
autofs_4.1.3-6.dsc
to pool/main/a/autofs/autofs_
Your message dated Wed, 08 Dec 2004 05:32:05 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#279627: fixed in autofs 4.1.3-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
autofs_4.1.3-6_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
autofs_4.1.3-6.dsc
autofs_4.1.3-6.diff.gz
autofs_4.1.3-6_i386.deb
autofs-hesiod_4.1.3-6_i386.deb
autofs-ldap_4.1.3-6_i386.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
> "SHG" == Steinar H Gunderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
SHG> On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 08:56:03AM +0200, Anders Boström wrote:
>> It still seems to be a documented feature to pass options to
>> "+"-entries.
SHG> Take a look at the patch for #280209 -- this is a duplicate, and the patch
reopen 279627
thanks
> "FPL" == Francesco P Lovergine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
FPL> Would you please test the following patch to /etc/init.d/autofs and
/etc/default/autofs?
FPL> It will disable direct maps as already done in Fedora and other distros.
>>
FPL> Oh, yup, I merged a coup
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 279627
Bug#279627: autofs: Broken direct-map support
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs databa
20 matches
Mail list logo
