Hi
This bug has been reported on the freshmeat project page for a
while ago, but I failed to reproduce the bug in my environment
(I'm using RedHat 7.3 so I couldn't try the exactly same
libraries as Debian's, but at least I tried wmaker for testing).
I'm wondering whether this problem is specific
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 243894 + fixed
Bug#243894: capplets-data: missing dependency on gconf2
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> tag 243973 + fixed
Bug#243973: No evolution(unstable) in Preferred Applications dialog in GNOME
Tags were: experimental
Tags added: f
Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Huh, why not? changelog entries which in retrospect fail to correctly
> describe the change, or have typo's, or whatever
I'm not sure, but for me the changelog describes the history of the
package and usually I don't change old entries ... but I
On Sat, Apr 17, 2004 at 09:41:25PM +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Well, that I don't know what changed in that version?
>
> Nothing changed, Christian has just orphaned all his gnome packages with
> 2 uploads. One with a full sentence mad
Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Well, that I don't know what changed in that version?
Nothing changed, Christian has just orphaned all his gnome packages with
2 uploads. One with a full sentence made from all the changelog entries
(some words in changelog of each of his packa
Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Into something non-silly (like "Package orphaned" or something, you
> might interdiff it to find out what changed, I don't trust this
> changelog entry to actually reflect what changed...).
Is that a really problem ? Christian did 2 uploads, one
On Sat, Apr 17, 2004 at 09:32:38PM +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Into something non-silly (like "Package orphaned" or something, you
> > might interdiff it to find out what changed, I don't trust this
> > changelog entry to actually reflec
Package: gnome-control-center
Severity: minor
I saw that in the experimental 2.6.0.3-2 this wasn't yet fixed:
Please change this silly changelog entry:
control-center (1:2.4.0-8) unstable; urgency=low
* You need
Your message dated Sat, 17 Apr 2004 04:47:04 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#244005: fixed in encompass 0.5.99.3-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Sat, 17 Apr 2004 04:47:04 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#228814: fixed in encompass 0.5.99.3-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Accepted:
encompass_0.5.99.3-4.diff.gz
to pool/main/e/encompass/encompass_0.5.99.3-4.diff.gz
encompass_0.5.99.3-4.dsc
to pool/main/e/encompass/encompass_0.5.99.3-4.dsc
encompass_0.5.99.3-4_i386.deb
to pool/main/e/encompass/encompass_0.5.99.3-4_i386.deb
Announcing to debian-devel-changes@list
encompass_0.5.99.3-4_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
encompass_0.5.99.3-4.dsc
encompass_0.5.99.3-4.diff.gz
encompass_0.5.99.3-4_i386.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
12 matches
Mail list logo
