Bug#190619: marked as done (wanpipe: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends)

2003-09-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 23 Sep 2003 01:37:27 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line why RC? has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t

Bug#212078: marked as done (Build-depends cannot be met in unstable)

2003-09-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 22 Sep 2003 20:32:23 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#212078: fixed in cooledit 3.17.7-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#192490: marked as done (libkdexparts1: uninstallable)

2003-09-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 23 Sep 2003 01:33:55 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line libkdexparts1: uninstallable has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your respo

cooledit_3.17.7-2_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2003-09-24 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: cooledit_3.17.7-2.diff.gz to pool/main/c/cooledit/cooledit_3.17.7-2.diff.gz cooledit_3.17.7-2.dsc to pool/main/c/cooledit/cooledit_3.17.7-2.dsc cooledit_3.17.7-2_i386.deb to pool/main/c/cooledit/cooledit_3.17.7-2_i386.deb coolicon_3.17.7-2_i386.deb to pool/main/c/cooledit/coolico

cooledit override disparity

2003-09-24 Thread Debian Installer
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the override file for the following file(s): libcw-dev_3.17.7-2_i386.deb: package says section is devel, override says libdevel. Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think the override is correct and the pac

libmail-bulkmail-perl_3.09-1_i386.changes REJECTED

2003-09-24 Thread Daniel Silverstone
Hi, This package appears to be Arch: any, and yet it contains no arch-specific components. It should either be Arch: all, or you're missing some .so files. === If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the override file requires editing, reply to this email.