docbook-to-man_2.0.0-11.1_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: docbook-to-man_2.0.0-11.1.diff.gz to pool/main/d/docbook-to-man/docbook-to-man_2.0.0-11.1.diff.gz docbook-to-man_2.0.0-11.1.dsc to pool/main/d/docbook-to-man/docbook-to-man_2.0.0-11.1.dsc docbook-to-man_2.0.0-11.1_i386.deb to pool/main/d/docbook-to-man/docbook-to-man_2.0.0-11.1_i38

Bug#169805: updates?

Hi, Le Sun, Aug 17, 2003 at 06:47:23PM +0200, martin f krafft écrivait: > any updates on this? i am not going to maintain megahal, but > i believe that the patch should only be included if it makes its way > upstream. I didn't send the patch upstream but I tried it on latest CVS version and it ap

Bug#169805: updates?

any updates on this? i am not going to maintain megahal, but i believe that the patch should only be included if it makes its way upstream. -- Please do not CC me when replying to lists; I read them! .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' :proud Debian developer, admin, and u

Bug#201133: How about Apps/Science

I want to close this and herewith suggest Apps/Science as the category. Objections? -- Please do not CC me when replying to lists; I read them! .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' :proud Debian developer, admin, and user `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to

Bug#205863: Judy needs its Maintainer field correcting

Package: libjudydebian0 Version: 0.0.4-5 debian/control still contains: Maintainer: Debian QA Group <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Uploaders: Eric Schwartz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> So apt-cache show still shows it as being owned by QA and in fact this mail is going to go to the QA group. So I'm cc'ing Ted too