Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 166738 + pending
Bug#166738: FTBFS with gcc 3.2
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs databas
Hello, QA people. Trying to close RC#138404, I see that the package is
completely unmaintained. Please see http://bugs.debian.org/vold. The
maintainer is not anybody from Debian (as far as I can investigate, because
db.d.o keeps broken :-( ).
The bug (#138404) would be fixed by
Your message dated Sat, 12 Jul 2003 14:17:08 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#193512: fixed in gtk-doc 1.0-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 198676 moreinfo
Bug#198676: gtk-doc-tools: fails to install
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian
tags + pending
thanks
I've filed a bug for the removing of this package from the archive, as
is the
last remnant from aethera, already removed. See
http://bugs.debian.org/ftp.debian.org.
--
Why is a cow? Mu. (Omm)
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 196892 -wontfix
Bug#196892: gtk-doc-tools: new upstream version 1.1 available
Tags were: wontfix
Tags removed: wontfix
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(adminis
Jerome Warnier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When I try to install it, I get:
> Setting up gtk-doc-tools (1.0-6) ...
> install/gtk-doc-tools: Handling install for emacsen flavor emacs20
> IO error reading /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/subdirs.el: Invalid argument
> emacs-package-install:
> /usr/lib/em
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
libjudy-dev_0.0.4-5_i386.deb: package says section is devel, override says
libdevel.
Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think
the override is correct and the pa
Accepted:
judy_0.0.4-5.diff.gz
to pool/main/j/judy/judy_0.0.4-5.diff.gz
judy_0.0.4-5.dsc
to pool/main/j/judy/judy_0.0.4-5.dsc
libjudy-dev_0.0.4-5_i386.deb
to pool/main/j/judy/libjudy-dev_0.0.4-5_i386.deb
libjudydebian0_0.0.4-5_i386.deb
to pool/main/j/judy/libjudydebian0_0.0.4-5_i386.deb
An
9 matches
Mail list logo