Bug#191103: crash after replying to a ticket

(apologies for replying to myself) On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 04:22:04PM +1000, Rudolph Pereira wrote: > I believe that this problem makes request-tracker unusable as it stands in > sarge/testing (this bug should probably be promoted to a serious issue, > but I'll leave that to the package maintaine

Bug#200129: marked as done (gnapster: Please switch to gettext-based debconf templates)

Your message dated Mon, 07 Jul 2003 19:02:14 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#200129: fixed in gnapster 1.5.0-5.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#172455: marked as done (gnapster: Should drop Build-Depends: libesd-alsa0-dev)

Your message dated Mon, 07 Jul 2003 19:02:14 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#172455: fixed in gnapster 1.5.0-5.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#143521: marked as done (gnapster: templates-en-es)

Your message dated Mon, 07 Jul 2003 19:02:14 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#143521: fixed in gnapster 1.5.0-5.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#137652: marked as done (russian debconf template file for gnapster package)

Your message dated Mon, 07 Jul 2003 19:02:14 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#137652: fixed in gnapster 1.5.0-5.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#116433: marked as done (gnapster: Brazilian portuguese (pt_BR_ debconf template translation)

Your message dated Mon, 07 Jul 2003 19:02:14 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#116433: fixed in gnapster 1.5.0-5.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

gnapster override disparity

There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the override file for the following file(s): gnapster_1.5.0-5.1_i386.deb: package says section is x11, override says gnome. gnapster-gtk_1.5.0-5.1_i386.deb: package says priority is optional, override says extra. Either the package

gnapster_1.5.0-5.1_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: gnapster-gtk_1.5.0-5.1_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gnapster/gnapster-gtk_1.5.0-5.1_i386.deb gnapster_1.5.0-5.1.diff.gz to pool/main/g/gnapster/gnapster_1.5.0-5.1.diff.gz gnapster_1.5.0-5.1.dsc to pool/main/g/gnapster/gnapster_1.5.0-5.1.dsc gnapster_1.5.0-5.1_i386.deb to pool/main/g/g