Bug#115325: marked as done (xkbsel: fails to build from source (automake 1.5 in sid))

2003-03-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 29 Mar 2003 14:47:19 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#115325: fixed in xkbsel 0.13-13.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#156039: marked as done (xkbsel depends on libdb.so.2)

2003-03-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 29 Mar 2003 14:47:19 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#156039: fixed in xkbsel 0.13-13.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#167885: marked as done (xkbsel: cssk_ibm wrong)

2003-03-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 29 Mar 2003 14:47:19 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#167885: fixed in xkbsel 0.13-13.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#186381: marked as done (xkbsel_0.13-13(unstable/sparc): obsolete build-depends)

2003-03-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 29 Mar 2003 14:47:19 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#186381: fixed in xkbsel 0.13-13.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#170212: marked as done (xkbsel: FTBFS: Build-Depends on xlib6g-dev)

2003-03-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 29 Mar 2003 14:47:19 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#170212: fixed in xkbsel 0.13-13.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

xkbsel_0.13-13.1_sparc.changes ACCEPTED

2003-03-29 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: libxkbsel-dev_0.13-13.1_sparc.deb to pool/main/x/xkbsel/libxkbsel-dev_0.13-13.1_sparc.deb xkbsel_0.13-13.1.diff.gz to pool/main/x/xkbsel/xkbsel_0.13-13.1.diff.gz xkbsel_0.13-13.1.dsc to pool/main/x/xkbsel/xkbsel_0.13-13.1.dsc xkbsel_0.13-13.1_sparc.deb to pool/main/x/xkbsel/xkbse

Re: kde metapackage

2003-03-29 Thread Colin Watson
On Sat, Mar 29, 2003 at 02:48:10PM +0100, Kai Lahmann wrote: > hi > any reason, why this package is not working in unstable? (it still wants > to install KDE2.2, which fails). Because nobody's maintaining it at the moment. Ben Burton said that he'd take it over and fix it up if nobody else got ro

kde metapackage

2003-03-29 Thread Kai Lahmann
hi any reason, why this package is not working in unstable? (it still wants to install KDE2.2, which fails). -- Kai Lahmann http://mozilla.linuxfaqs.de/