Bug#162375: FTBFS: Build failure of libg++27 on i386

2002-09-25 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Package: libg++27 Version: 2.7.2.1-17 libg++27 fails to build from source on i386, when doing a binary-all build. I am filing this bug to notify you that I failed to build your package from source. It is a serious problem that your source does not build from source using the information provide

Bug#162373: FTBFS: Build failure of emacs20-dl on i386

2002-09-25 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Package: emacs20-dl Version: 20.7-14.3 emacs20-dl fails to build from source on i386, when doing a binary-all build. I am filing this bug to notify you that I failed to build your package from source. It is a serious problem that your source does not build from source using the information prov

eeyes_0.3.12-7_source.changes ACCEPTED

2002-09-25 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: eeyes_0.3.12-7.diff.gz to pool/main/e/eeyes/eeyes_0.3.12-7.diff.gz eeyes_0.3.12-7.dsc to pool/main/e/eeyes/eeyes_0.3.12-7.dsc Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

未承諾広告※無料プレゼント

2002-09-25 Thread お金貸します
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <送信者>mcco taketu yosi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 情報http://www6.plala.or.jp/taketu <内容>無料プレゼント ●リニューアルオープン記念につきシルバーリングまたは18金ピアスを500名様にプレゼントいたします。応募方法はこちらからどうぞ http://www6.plala.or.jp/taketu/rentpage1/

Bug#113445: elm-me+: fmt would be useful as a standalone utility

2002-09-25 Thread era eriksson
On Wed, 25 Sep 2002 11:42:40 +0200, Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Have you tried mailutils? I think it's exactly what you want. Thanks for the pointer. Yes, it seems to provide frm(1) as well as some other useful utilities. Maybe this bug could be closed. /* era */ -- Too much to s

Bug#113445: elm-me+: fmt would be useful as a standalone utility

2002-09-25 Thread Matej Vela
On Tue, Sep 25, 2001 at 10:03:44AM +0300, era eriksson wrote: > I like the frm(1) program which comes with Elm, but I don't wish to > install the whole Elm package for a single small utility. > > Would you consider moving the non-Elm-specific utilities into their > own separate package? Most of th

Bug#141183: elm-me+: Please use alternatives for /usr/bin/frm

2002-09-25 Thread Matej Vela
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 12:01:43PM -0500, Jeff Bailey wrote: > Package: elm-me+ > Version: N/A; reported 2002-04-04 > Severity: wishlist > > Please consider using an alternative for frm. Bug #139762, and > #116374 are requests for mailutils to divert this file, but I'd rather > use alternatives i