Bug#133903: sarg: sites&users and date/time must be changed to sites_users and date_time

Package: sarg Version: 1.2.1-4 %subj% in sarg.conf to generate reports properly -- System Information Debian Release: 3.0 Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux rasko.ru 2.4.17 #1 SMP Tue Mar 19 09:20:46 MSK 2002 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C Versions of packages sarg depends on: ii libc6

cgiemail_1.6-14_i386.changes REJECTED

Rejected: no signature found in cgiemail_1.6-14_i386.changes. Rejected: no signature found in cgiemail_1.6-14.dsc. === If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the override file requires editing, reply to this email. Your rejected files are in incoming/REJECT/. (Some may al

Bug#142047: FTBFS: no ia64 support

Package: freedce Version: 1.1.0-4 Severity: important This package fails to build from source on ia64 with the error: No rule to make target `ia64/marshall.h', needed by `all-am'. Bdale -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROT

Bug#129104: cgiemail: buffer overflow and script reading vulnerabilities

On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 11:00:06PM -0500, Thomas Smith wrote: > On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 02:50:18PM -0500, Colin Watson wrote: > > Better fixes are available, though. I'd forgotten that the last > > message in this bug left it up to me to test them ... I'll have a look > > today or tomorrow and see

elm-me+ override disparity

There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the override file for the following file(s): elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+95-3_alpha.deb: priority is overridden from standard to optional. Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think the override is correct and the pac

elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+95-3_alpha.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+95-3.diff.gz to pool/main/e/elm-me+/elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+95-3.diff.gz elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+95-3.dsc to pool/main/e/elm-me+/elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+95-3.dsc elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+95-3_alpha.deb to pool/main/e/elm-me+/elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+95-3_alpha.deb Announcing to debian-devel-chan

Bug#115108: marked as done (liblockdev1: questionable and useless umask(0))

Your message dated Tue, 09 Apr 2002 10:32:27 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#115108: fixed in lockdev 1.0.1-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

emacs20-dl override disparity

There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the override file for the following file(s): emacs20-dl-el_20.7-14.3_all.deb: priority is overridden from optional to extra. emacs20-dl-dev_20.7-14.3_all.deb: section is overridden from editors to devel. emacs20-dl-dev_20.7-14.3_all.d

emacs20-dl_20.7-14.3_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: emacs20-dl-dev_20.7-14.3_all.deb to pool/main/e/emacs20-dl/emacs20-dl-dev_20.7-14.3_all.deb emacs20-dl-el_20.7-14.3_all.deb to pool/main/e/emacs20-dl/emacs20-dl-el_20.7-14.3_all.deb emacs20-dl_20.7-14.3.diff.gz to pool/main/e/emacs20-dl/emacs20-dl_20.7-14.3.diff.gz emacs20-dl_20.7-