Your message dated Sun, 3 Feb 2002 23:34:43 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#132168: svgalibg1: Files in etc not marked as conffiles
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Your message dated Sun, 03 Feb 2002 15:11:15 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#125026: fixed in rmc 20010628CVS-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sun, 03 Feb 2002 15:11:15 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#125320: fixed in rmc 20010628CVS-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sun, 03 Feb 2002 15:11:15 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#130965: fixed in rmc 20010628CVS-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sun, 03 Feb 2002 15:11:15 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#129117: fixed in rmc 20010628CVS-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Installing:
svgalib-bin_1.4.3-5_i386.deb
to pool/main/s/svgalib/svgalib-bin_1.4.3-5_i386.deb
svgalib1-altdev_1.4.3-5_i386.deb
to pool/main/s/svgalib/svgalib1-altdev_1.4.3-5_i386.deb
svgalib1_1.4.3-5_i386.deb
to pool/main/s/svgalib/svgalib1_1.4.3-5_i386.deb
svgalib_1.4.3-5.diff.gz
to pool/m
There are disparities between your recently installed upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
librmc-dev_20010628CVS-5_i386.deb: section is overridden from libs to devel.
rmc-binaries_20010628CVS-5_i386.deb: section is overridden from libs to utils.
Either the package or the overr
Installing:
librmc-dev_20010628CVS-5_i386.deb
to pool/main/r/rmc/librmc-dev_20010628CVS-5_i386.deb
librmc_20010628CVS-5_i386.deb
to pool/main/r/rmc/librmc_20010628CVS-5_i386.deb
rmc-binaries_20010628CVS-5_i386.deb
to pool/main/r/rmc/rmc-binaries_20010628CVS-5_i386.deb
rmc_20010628CVS-5.diff.
Your message dated Sun, 03 Feb 2002 14:56:22 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#132146: fixed in biomode 1.002-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Installing:
biomode_1.002-6.diff.gz
to pool/main/b/biomode/biomode_1.002-6.diff.gz
biomode_1.002-6.dsc
to pool/main/b/biomode/biomode_1.002-6.dsc
biomode_1.002-6_all.deb
to pool/main/b/biomode/biomode_1.002-6_all.deb
Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org
Closing bugs: 132146
Your message dated Sun, 3 Feb 2002 19:34:52 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line No longer applicable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility
Your message dated Sun, 3 Feb 2002 19:38:29 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line xcoral now maintained by QA Group
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Your message dated Sun, 3 Feb 2002 19:38:29 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line xcoral now maintained by QA Group
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 97738 gv: can't render cook-2.17.ug.ps.gz
Bug#97738: gv
Changed Bug title.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
On Sun, Feb 03, 2002 at 06:06:01PM +, Malcolm Parsons wrote:
> Package: biomode
> Version: 1.002-5
> Severity: Serious
> Justification: Policy 11.7
>
> biomode contains files in /etc that are not marked as conffiles.
> This violates a must in Debian Policy, so is a Serious bug.
I'll handle th
Package: biomode
Version: 1.002-5
Severity: Serious
Justification: Policy 11.7
biomode contains files in /etc that are not marked as conffiles.
This violates a must in Debian Policy, so is a Serious bug.
This is a mass bug submission, and has been discussed on debian-devel
starting at
http://list
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 27199 lshell fails to set limits in many cases
Bug#27199: lshell fails to set limits in many cases, default limits too low
Changed Bug title.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking sys
Your message dated Sun, 3 Feb 2002 17:33:09 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed with hkgerman 2-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibi
Your message dated Sun, 3 Feb 2002 16:01:07 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line mule2 removed from unstable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your respons
Your message dated Sun, 3 Feb 2002 16:01:07 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line mule2 removed from unstable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your respons
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 129104 patch
Bug#129104: script reading + temp file problems
Tags added: patch
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
On Sun, Jan 20, 2002 at 11:54:06PM -0500, Thomas Smith wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2002 at 04:42:42PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> > Yes, with the current design there really isn't any way to do it well
> > (including backwards compatibility), only patch it up. I suggest a
> > simple 'templatedir="/fo
22 matches
Mail list logo
