Bug#373218:

2007-07-01 Thread Raphael
s the e-mail address ^*&[EMAIL PROTECTED], which is entirely valid under RFC 2822. All that can be handled if all the characters that should be replaced are listed somewhere. -- Atomo64 - Raphael Please avoid sending me Word, PowerPoint or Excel attachments. See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html

Bug#389775: please change "experimental" buildd link with something more descriptive

2006-09-27 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Wed, 27 Sep 2006, Bernhard R. Link wrote: > Package: qa.debian.org > Severity: wishlist > > The "experimental" Buildd Logs link does not only list experimental > package versions but also non-release archs, thus confusing people > into thinking there is nothing interesting when there are no > e

Re: Bug#391023: XS-Vcs-field splitting into XS-Vcs-source & XS-Vcs-dpkg

2006-11-12 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Sun, 12 Nov 2006, Geert Stappers wrote: > The text tells about the (upstream) source by using the generic name > "package", the example tells about the Debian directory. So fix the wording... and don't change everything when there has been some serious discussion on -devel and when lots of pack

Re: Automated mails to maintainers to inform them of their pkg status

2006-11-19 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Mon, 13 Nov 2006, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Hi, > > With the release getting closer, I have the impression that some (a lot > of?) maintainers are unaware of the "buginess" status of their packages. > Of course, there's the weekly mail on d-d-a, but it doesn't really > answer the question of "are

Bug#412033: PTS: extremely noisy when new package closes many bugs

2007-02-23 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Fri, 23 Feb 2007, era eriksson wrote: > Guess twice how many copies of the following message I have received? > > From: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Bug#xx: marked as done (bug title) > > I can understand the motivati

Re: PTS subscriptions unclear

2007-02-23 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hello, On Fri, 23 Feb 2007, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Let's take package feed2imap, for which I'm the maintainer. I think I > receive a mail when the testing status changes (new version gets into > testing). > > But why I am receiving it ? I'm not subscribed to feed2imap in the PTS. That's because

Bug#412033: PTS: extremely noisy when new package closes many bugs

2007-02-23 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Fri, 23 Feb 2007, Christoph Berg wrote: > > keyword you won't receive discussions concerning bug reports. > > I agree that the "done" mails from the BTS are quite boring as they > only repeat the initial mail. That's because most of the -done mails are generated by dak. But there are also manu

Bug#412033: PTS: extremely noisy when new package closes many bugs

2007-02-23 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Fri, 23 Feb 2007, era eriksson wrote: > Any chance then you could call that category "bts-dak" or something, and > at least make it something one could opt out from separately from the > other stuff? Perhaps the dak maintainer could cooperate to make this > less painful to code? I don't want to

Re: [idea] DDPO by mail

2007-03-07 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hi, On Wed, 07 Mar 2007, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > A server side implementation is going to be pretty easy to ignore too: > > even if one doesn't killfile them automated e-mails often end up being > > things that are deleted unread based on the subject. If it doesn't do > > opt in it's also likel

Re: XS-Vcs-field

2007-05-09 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hello, On Wed, 09 May 2007, Felipe Sateler wrote: > Doesn't the PTS also use this information to inform of vcs commits to the > suscribed users? No. The PTS forward VCS notifications that it receives, but it doesn't generate them on its own. Each package/project has to setup its VCS to send the n

Bug#427467: qa.debian.org: possible patch

2007-06-20 Thread Raphael Geissert
Package: qa.debian.org Followup-For: Bug #427467 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 The first patch (attachment graph.txt.diff.gz) could possibly help with this. Otherwise the memory limit should be increased (but the more packages are added to the repository, the higher the memory u

Bug#373218: qa.debian.org: Patch

2007-06-28 Thread Raphael Geissert
Package: qa.debian.org Tags: patch Followup-For: Bug #373218 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I just wrote a patch for this problem. The best solution I found it to drop the current naming convention of the lintian reports and use the maintainer login (the same way most of the othe

Re: Bug#373218: qa.debian.org: Patch

2007-06-28 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Thu, 28 Jun 2007, Russ Allbery wrote: > > --- orig/html_reports 2007-06-28 12:33:42.0 -0500 > > +++ new/html_reports2007-06-28 12:14:58.0 -0500 > > @@ -480,11 +480,7 @@ > > > my $file = $maint; > > if ($file) { > > - $file =~ s/^(.+)\<.*$/$1/; > > -

Re: Bug#373218: qa.debian.org: Patch

2007-06-28 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Thu, 28 Jun 2007, Russ Allbery wrote: > Well, he extracts everything between <>, but I believe we still lose if, > for instance, there's a # in the e-mail address (which is an entirely > valid RFC 2822 character). I'm a little worried about +, which is a very > common character and sometimes ha

Re: Bug#373218: qa.debian.org: Patch

2007-06-29 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Fri, 29 Jun 2007, Russ Allbery wrote: > According to RFC 2396, the list of characters reserved, banned, or > disrecommended for URIs are: > > ; / ? : @ & = + $ , < > # % " { } | \ ^ [ ] ` > > and space. The safest thing to do would be to map all of those characters > to _. (Some of them

Bug#431305: PTS: Testing version in "Available versions" not uptodate

2007-07-02 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Sun, 01 Jul 2007, Rainer Dorsch wrote: > Package: qa.debian.org > Severity: normal > > I find for kdelibs at http://packages.qa.debian.org/k/kdelibs.html > > -> in the latest news section >[2007-06-26] kdelibs 4:3.5.7.dfsg.1-1 MIGRATED to testing (Britney) > > -> in the Available versions

Bug#377282: mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] not delivered to maintainer by default

2007-07-16 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hi, On Mon, 16 Jul 2007, martin f krafft wrote: > also sprach Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.07.08.1426 +0200]: > > The right way to fix this bug is to follow the plan described there: > > http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/pts > > (under the parag

Bug#377282: mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] not delivered to maintainer by default

2007-07-16 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hi, On Mon, 16 Jul 2007, martin f krafft wrote: > also sprach Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.07.16.2026 +0200]: > > Feel free to start that script first. :-) Adding the keyword is > > a matter of minutes. > > The point was that I wanted to verify the oper

Bug#433095: DDPO: does not show all my sponsored packages

2007-07-16 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Mon, 16 Jul 2007, Christoph Berg wrote: > > The "Uploader:" tooltip shows only a key ID, but that key id is in fact (a > > subkey of) my key. Maybe it doesn't handle subkeys correctly? > > Hi, > > this is another instance of "the projectb doesn't know your keyid > yet" that happens to every n

Bug#377282: mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] not delivered to maintainer by default

2007-07-17 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Tue, 17 Jul 2007, martin f krafft wrote: > also sprach Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.07.17.0058 +0200]: > > The script needs to run with write access to the database so you're not > > going to run it by yourself on the real installation anyway. :) > &g

Bug#377282: mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] not delivered to maintainer by default

2007-07-17 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Mon, 16 Jul 2007, martin f krafft wrote: > also sprach Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.07.08.1426 +0200]: > > I can easily create the "contact" keyword but someone needs to write a > > script which does the auto-subscription of maintainers to the PTS. A

Bug#391816: qa: links to buildd logs should point to build.cgi or pkg.cgi

2007-07-17 Thread Raphael Hertzog
user debian-qa@lists.debian.org usertag 391816 - pts thanks On Sun, 08 Oct 2006, Eugeniy Meshcheryakov wrote: > Please replace links to buildd logs on > http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login= > and http://packages.qa.debian.org/ with links to > http://buildd.debian.org/build.cgi?pkg= or, even

Bug#380631: closed by Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Re: Bug#380631: Fwd: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender)

2007-07-17 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Tue, 17 Jul 2007, martin f krafft wrote: > also sprach Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.07.17.1642 > +0200]: > > The configuration has been lifted for the bounce handler. The > > special header is still required for any non d.o machine. But it's > > going to stay that way, s

Bug#377282: mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] not delivered to maintainer by default

2007-07-17 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Tue, 17 Jul 2007, martin f krafft wrote: > 1. iterates all packages and extracts sourcepkg:maintainer pairs The "Sources" files are already downloaded regularly as part of the web interface. You might be able to simply read the data in www/incoming/Sources_unstable_{main,contrib,non-free}. >

Bug#433511: Fwd: Overview of ddd have dead links

2007-07-17 Thread Raphael Hertzog
reassign 433511 www.debian.org thanks On Tue, 17 Jul 2007, Daniel Schepler wrote: > I got this message from a user and verified it. The only thing unusual about > ddd which might be causing this is that ddd-doc > symlinks /usr/share/doc/ddd-doc -> /usr/share/doc/ddd (and depends on an > equal

Bug#377282: mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] not delivered to maintainer by default

2007-07-17 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Tue, 17 Jul 2007, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > > 2. checks whether maintainer is subscribed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > a. if no, subscribe the maintainer, thereby getting contact on > > by default. > > Yes. I spoke too fast, in fact not as simple as that. The

Bug#377282: mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] not delivered to maintainer by default

2007-07-17 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Tue, 17 Jul 2007, Adeodato Simó wrote: > * martin f krafft [Tue, 17 Jul 2007 16:17:18 +0200]: > > > Great, so I'll try to "clean up" the database then with a script, > > which: > > > 1. iterates all packages and extracts sourcepkg:maintainer pairs > > 2. checks whether maintainer is subscr

Bug#377282: mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] not delivered to maintainer by default

2007-07-17 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Tue, 17 Jul 2007, martin f krafft wrote: > so get_tags() - bts - bts-control + contact --> set_tags(). > > (just jotting it down for posterity) > > Now if we do it this way, then the changes to @packages.debian.org > need to happen at the same time as the pts changes, or else some BTS > mail w

Bug#433095: DDPO: does not show all my sponsored packages

2007-07-17 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Tue, 17 Jul 2007, Christoph Berg wrote: > > > id | fingerprint| uid > > > --+--+-- > > > 5823 | F7867D1E8EEB8DE7EBBE05BF25D28CC5957D58CF | 1319 > > > 5900 | 86CB46D209591D06AE9C2A666CF485B3DCBA43DF | > > >

Bug#430143: closed by Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Re: Bug#430143: pts.cgi: use tooltips to explain what the different checkboxes mean.)

2007-07-18 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hi, On Wed, 18 Jul 2007, Ivan Baldo wrote: >Wow thanks!!! Its wonderful now! :-) >Just a tought: summary could tell that ATM is used for notifications of > progression from unstable to testing, I find that particular option > interesting exactly because of that. >Thanks again!!! Don

Re: Bug#377282: mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] not delivered to maintainer by default

2007-07-18 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Wed, 18 Jul 2007, martin f krafft wrote: > also sprach Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.07.17.2113 +0200]: > > > So this is a script to be run periodically? > > > > Yes. > > I am beginning to like the idea less, though I understand the c

Bug#433894: qa.debian.org: "Updating foo introduces new bugs:" links only to the first link

2007-07-20 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hi, On Fri, 20 Jul 2007, Paul Wise wrote: > Package: qa.debian.org > Severity: minor > Tags: patch > > When a package introduces new bugs to testing, the "Updating foo > introduces new bugs:" links only link to one bug of the whole lot. > > An example is here: > > http://packages.qa.debian.org/

Bug#435794: packages.qa.debian.org: please add reverse depends

2007-08-03 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Fri, 03 Aug 2007, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > On Friday 3 August 2007 10:30, Adriaan Peeters wrote: > > It would be nice to be able to check reverse depends without an up to > > date distribution installation. So please add reverse depends to the > > packages.qa.d.o and/or packages.d.o sites. > >

Re: proposal: upload to the collab-maint repo orphaned packages

2007-08-17 Thread Raphael Hertzog
the middle is of very few help. I already proposed what your describe 2 years ago at the QA meeting (with adn and sukria): Slide: http://meetings-archive.debian.net/pub/debian-meetings/2005/qa-meeting-darmstadt/slides/2005-09-11_Collaborative-maintenance-by-external-contributors_Alexis-Sukrieh+Rapha

Re: proposal: upload to the collab-maint repo orphaned packages

2007-08-17 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Fri, 17 Aug 2007, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > For the moment I've only had the time to read the slide, I'll postpone > the .ogg. But indeed my proposal is exactly the same as yours ... and > actually your slides contradict what you're claiming above. I guess > that's because the discussion after

freshmeat.php: a sf.php-like script for watch files

2007-11-20 Thread Raphael Geissert
s is it. Any kind of feedback is very welcomed :-) [1] see the attached freshmeat.php file [2] http://deb.atomo64.puffinhost.com/freshmeat.php/ [3] see the attached uscan.patch file Kind regards, Raphael Geissert -- Atomo64 - Raphael Please avoid send

Re: Mole web interface?

2007-11-22 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hi Cyril, On Thu, 22 Nov 2007, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > I'm currently having a look at mole so as to prepare a bit some ideas before > the meeting, and it looks like there should be a web interface hosted on > merkel > ([1,2]). Is there any reason why it has been disabled? It's not disabled: htt

Re: URL convention to point to per-package lintian checks

2007-12-02 Thread Raphael Geissert
I recommend you to read the whole bug report[1]. It would be great if you could finish my work on that. > > Many thanks in advance, Cheers. > [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=373218 Sincerely, -- Atomo64 - Raphael Please avoid sending me Word, PowerPoint or Ex

Re: URL convention to point to per-package lintian checks

2007-12-03 Thread Raphael Geissert
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 01:27:41PM -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote: > > I surely can, but before doing so I would prefer to fix the URL naming > scheme in the right place, see my reply to Russ. What my patches actually do is switch to an email address-base

Re: freshmeat.php: a sf.php-like script for watch files

2007-12-07 Thread Raphael Geissert
Hi all, Raphael Geissert wrote: > > I think this is it. Any kind of feedback is very welcomed :-) > So, any feedback? :) Sincerely, -- Atomo64 - Raphael Please avoid sending me Word, PowerPoint or Excel attachments. See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html

Re: Membership of qa group and access to qa user

2007-12-08 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Thu, 06 Dec 2007, Luk Claes wrote: > Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 08:39:24PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote: > >> Currently it seems that tbm,weasel,igenibel,aba,jeroen,myon,herzog have > >> sudo access to the qa user. > > > > I have access to the sudo qa user as well; where di

Re: Making Debian QA sexier / moving away from http://qa.debian.org/

2007-12-12 Thread Raphael Geissert
and then use www.d.o's stylesheet. That will probably fix the one or two glitches. I'll see what I can do for it this weekend. Sincerely, -- Atomo64 - Raphael Please avoid sending me Word, PowerPoint or Excel attachments. See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html -- To

Bug#437675: Seems, the watch handler is not able to handle mangles in wath files

2007-12-15 Thread Raphael Geissert
update of the status of the package will do the rest. Sincerely, -- Atomo64 - Raphael Please avoid sending me Word, PowerPoint or Excel attachments. See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe"

Bug#457190: qa.debian.org: selecting default CSS layout for PTS

2007-12-20 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007, Thomas Viehmann wrote: > How about cookie + let mod_rewrite rewrite a default.css URI based on the > ocokie? That would eliminate the need for JavaScript. (Needs apache2, though, > AFAICT.) That's a nice idea, but how do you use a cookie in a mod_rewrite configuration? It mig

Re: Coordinate time for the lintian URL updates

2007-12-21 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007, Russ Allbery wrote: > lintian has migrated to testing, so I'm now ready to update lintian.d.o. > An update will mean a full-archive run, which takes a little more than a > day, after which the old maintainer URLs will be no more and the new > format with the e-mail address must

Re: Coordinate time for the lintian URL updates

2007-12-22 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Fri, 21 Dec 2007, Russ Allbery wrote: > Okay, lintian is finishing its daily run for today right now, and as soon > as that finishes, I'll kick off the full archive run. It should be done > sometime on Saturday afternoon (US Pacific time), judging from past > experience. Ok. I updated the link

Re: Please take down junk QA pages

2008-01-01 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hi, On Mon, 31 Dec 2007, Thomas Viehmann wrote: > please take down the abandoned QA pages at > > http://wagner-xen1.debian.org/~thuriaux-guest/qa/ > > apparently they are regenerated daily from old data, creating the false > impression of containing recent information. > > The last message cont

List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all

2008-01-02 Thread Raphael Geissert
d-list -u). As usually any kind of feedback is very welcomed. Cheers, Raphael Geissert Anibal Avelar (Fixxxer) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> centerim Loic Dachary (OuoU) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> unittest++ (U) Peter De Schrijver (p2) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> openwince-include Johan Euph

Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all

2008-01-02 Thread Raphael Geissert
Hello Kurt, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 01:17:24PM -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote: >> Hello all, >> >> I've written a script which tries to detect packages which should be >> architecture all based on the fact that they don't contain a Depe

Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all

2008-01-02 Thread Raphael Geissert
#x27;s something linda/lintian should do, this is just a simple/quick list of packages and as I said it may contain some false positives (although there's usually a reason/bug causing the package to be listed). > > Cheers, > Cheers, -- Atomo64 - Raphael Please avoid sendin

Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all

2008-01-02 Thread Raphael Geissert
ul van Tilburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> libdaemons-ruby1.8 (U) Marcela Tiznado <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> when Juan Esteban Monsalve Tobon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> libgii1-target-x (U) liblpsolve55-dev Gerhard Tonn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> gcc-3.3-base (U) gcc-3.4-base (U) Josh

Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all

2008-01-02 Thread Raphael Geissert
my last message (Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) which contains the 'good' list (I wonder why dd-list goes the source packages way when the ones provided in the input are nothing but binary packages). Cheers, -- Atomo64 - Raphael Please avoid sending me Word, PowerPoint o

Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all

2008-01-02 Thread Raphael Geissert
Pierre Habouzit wrote: > On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 07:58:24PM +0000, Raphael Geissert wrote: >> Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>libgss-dbg (U) >>shishi-dbg (U) > > rrght... > -dbg package without a Depends? that sounds like a bug (please rea

Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all

2008-01-02 Thread Raphael Geissert
f greps”, you might want to expose the code / algorithm you > used. > Parts of it are pretty ugly (and the Packages-fetching part isn't there), but I'm attaching it anyway. Cheers, - -- Atomo64 - Raphael Please avoid sending me Word, PowerPoint or Excel attachments. S

Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all

2008-01-02 Thread Raphael Geissert
ting my self (first message): > This is usually bug either because of a missing Depends or because the > package should be Architecture: all. Cheers, -- Atomo64 - Raphael Please avoid sending me Word, PowerPoint or Excel attachments. See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.ht

Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all

2008-01-02 Thread Raphael Geissert
ook at the contents of the package and verify it > does not change between architecture. > I'll try to do it when I have time and after the archive wide lintian check (on amd64 binary packages only) I talked about in #-qa Cheers, Raphael Geissert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all

2008-01-03 Thread Raphael Geissert
names http://alioth.debian.org/~atomo64-guest/should-be-arch-all.by-maint.txt Same as above but ordered by maintainer (no Uploaders available because Packages doesn't provide it). Cheers, -- Atomo64 - Raphael Please avoid sending me Word, PowerPoint or Excel attachments. See http://www.gnu.org

Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all

2008-01-03 Thread Raphael Geissert
Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote: > Raphael Geissert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Brendan O'Dea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>perl-base > > That's a false positive. Please also take a look at Pre-Depends. Or > simply let off of this effort, the

Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all

2008-01-10 Thread Raphael Geissert
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> grub Camm Maguire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> hol88-library Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> grub (U) Masahito Omote <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> libuim-data Otavio Salvador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> grub (U) Jason Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> grub (U)

Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all

2008-01-10 Thread Raphael Geissert
Cyril Brulebois wrote: > On 11/01/2008, Raphael Geissert wrote: >> Note that this is the raw output of the script, packages which MUST be >> arch all (debian-installer is excluded, because of technical reasons) >> are listed below the list. > > *MUST*, ahah. Sorry,

Bug#460983: PTS: Please link to Security Tracker

2008-01-16 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hi, On Wed, 16 Jan 2008, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > It would be good if the PTS would link to the Debian Security Tracker. > > The URL format is > http://security-tracker.debian.net/tracker/source-package/SRCPKGNAME Can you provide a (regularly updated) file which list sources packages for whic

Bug#461000: packages.qa.debian.org: Status report bug list only links to one bug

2008-01-16 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Wed, 16 Jan 2008, Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote: > Package: qa.debian.org > Severity: normal > > Hello, > > The entry "Testing status" refers to the list of bugs that are > holding back a package. This entry is a hyperlink but links to only > one of the bugs even when there is more than one bug t

Bug#460983: PTS: Please link to Security Tracker

2008-01-16 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Wed, 16 Jan 2008, Florian Weimer wrote: > Yes, this should be possible. I will think a bit abot it end try to > write some code to implement this. It will be easier if we also include > resolved security issues in the count (otherwise, it's hard to express > the state in a single number). I'd

Bug#460821: color wrong in watch column of xsel

2008-01-16 Thread Raphael Geissert
g --compare-versions $upstream gt $debian; then echo magenta; elif dpkg --compare-versions $upstream lt $debian; then echo AA; else echo green; fi magenta That is more or less the shell-code version of the PHP code used by the DDPO. Cheers, -- Atomo64 - Raphael Please avoid sending me Word,

Bug#356826: PTS: could e-mail when DEHS detects new upstream release

2008-01-21 Thread Raphael Geissert
essages. I'm explicitly CC'ing [EMAIL PROTECTED] to see how this can be done (adding the 'newversion' tag/keyword to the PTS and making a default:off). Cheers, -- Atomo64 - Raphael Please avoid sending me Word, PowerPoint or Excel attachments. See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html

Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all

2008-01-21 Thread Raphael Geissert
ms differ Processing libuclibc0... libuim-data has same files: amd64/md5sums i386/md5sums but differ from powerpc/md5sums Processing libunittest++0... Cheers, Raphael Geissert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#356826: PTS: could e-mail when DEHS detects new upstream release

2008-01-21 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Mon, 21 Jan 2008, Raphael Geissert wrote: > > PTS could e-mail whenever DEHS detects a new upstream release of the > > package being monitored by a watch file. This would be particularly > > usefull in case where upstream packages don't have a mailing list to > >

Bug#356826: PTS: could e-mail when DEHS detects new upstream release

2008-01-22 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Tue, 22 Jan 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I asked about adding a new tag because summary is by default sent to > the maintainer unless I've never really payed too much attention and > the testing migration email is sent to both, the maintainer and the > PTS. That's the case: the testing mail

Bug#461891: qa.debian.org: DDPO testing migration excuses changes

2008-01-23 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Wed, 23 Jan 2008, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: > On Mon Jan 21, 2008 at 20:36:19 +0900, Paul Wise wrote: > > Please use release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl instead of > > bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl, since the former is more "official" and > > more likely to be maintained since the release

Bug#356826: PTS: could e-mail when DEHS detects new upstream release

2008-01-23 Thread Raphael Geissert
tag 356826 pending thanks On 23/01/2008, Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 22 Jan 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I asked about adding a new tag because summary is by default sent to > > the maintainer unless I've never really payed too much att

Bug#462470: PTS: don't show changelog-only ubuntu patches

2008-01-25 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hi, On Fri, 25 Jan 2008, Paul Wise wrote: > Package: qa.debian.org > Severity: wishlist > > I would like it if the PTS didn't link to changelog-only Ubuntu patches. > Here is an example: > > http://packages.qa.debian.org/s/synfig.html > http://patches.ubuntu.com/s/synfig/synfig_0.61.07-1build1.p

Re: empty Packages.qa.debian.org pages gone

2008-01-25 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > On Wed, 14 Apr 2004 10:31:55 +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > > Caused due to space problems, it's fixed now. Converting this bug into a > > minor one about better error handling, but importance is really > > very minor IMHO (shouldn't happen, i

Bug#354307: packages.qa.debian.org/m/mydsn.html has weird sorted news

2008-01-26 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Sat, 26 Jan 2008, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 08:05:01PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > > Moreover, and that's the main point of this report, it seems that the > > last time the clash happened was January 2006, no other clashes in 2007 > > nor 2008. Is it possible tha

Bug#457759: PTS: bug summary counts bugs that are assigned to two or more packages more than once

2008-01-26 Thread Raphael Hertzog
from www/bin/update_incoming.sh: > > # Download bugs summary > nice_wget http://merkel.debian.org/~hertzog/pts/bugs.txt bugs.txt > > and the downloaded file is binary package oriented (for example, "boinc" > itself does not appear). > > Raphael, how is that file

Bug#354307: packages.qa.debian.org/m/mydsn.html has weird sorted news

2008-01-26 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Sat, 26 Jan 2008, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > On Sat, Jan 26, 2008 at 02:17:19PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > > Note that this behaviour should be fixed. It happens that dak send several > > Accepted mails during the same second for example when the package gets > >

Bug#354307: packages.qa.debian.org/m/mydsn.html has weird sorted news

2008-01-27 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Sun, 27 Jan 2008, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > On Sat, Jan 26, 2008 at 06:21:16PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > > targetfile = "%s/%s.0.txt" % (dir, info['timestamp']) > > At least it'll fix the sorting order... > > Yes, but it will add the "

Bug#463186: PTS: should not list the same architecture more than once

2008-01-29 Thread Raphael Geissert
Package: qa.debian.org User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: pts Severity: minor The PTS in pages for packages such as 'gambas'[1] should only list 'i386' once and not 20 times. [1]http://packages.qa.debian.org/g/gambas.html Kind regards, -- Atomo64 - Raphael Please a

Re: DEHS error for gpe-soundserver mangling

2008-02-01 Thread Raphael Geissert
he PTS on its next pulse. Note that the change made to DEHS also needs to be applied to the DDPO code so the correct versions comparison is also performed there. I'll send an appropriate patch to Myon during this weekend. Sincerely, -- Atomo64 - Raphael Please avoid sending me Word, PowerPoint

Bug#462470: PTS: don't show changelog-only ubuntu patches

2008-02-04 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Mon, 04 Feb 2008, Scott James Remnant wrote: > On Fri, 2008-01-25 at 19:24 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > > Scott, could you exclude those from the PATCH file that you generate? > > (http://patches.ubuntu.com/PATCHES) > > > Please file it as a wishlist bug: > >

Bug#464021: PTS: please notify when a package is orphaned/ITAed

2008-02-08 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hi, On Thu, 07 Feb 2008, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > On 04/02/08 at 20:24 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > Package: qa.debian.org > > User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Usertags: pts > > Severity: wishlist > > > > Hi, > > > > This was raised in the discussion of #453467, about the orphaning, then > > remov

Re: What to do if Homepage seems to have vanished

2008-02-17 Thread Raphael Geissert
roken link. On that subject please refer to #459012 > > Kind regards > >Andreas. > Cheers, -- Atomo64 - Raphael Please avoid sending me Word, PowerPoint or Excel attachments. See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Re: the new style "mass tirage" of bugs

2008-02-23 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Sat, 23 Feb 2008, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 02:59:46PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > > http://packages.qa.debian.org/d/dpkg.html > > http://people.debian.org/~glandium/bts/d/dpkg.png > > Technical question: why are the graphs on people.d.o inste

Bug#468798: PTS: add Debian favicon to web interface

2008-03-01 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Sat, 01 Mar 2008, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > user [EMAIL PROTECTED] > usertag 468798 + pts > thanks > > On Sat, Mar 01, 2008 at 03:54:43PM +0100, Giovanni Mascellani wrote: > > Lower-than-low priority bug, but I like to see the nice Debian swirl > > also in the favicon of packages.qa.debian.or

Re: co-mentor wanted for a QA GSOC project

2008-03-02 Thread Raphael Geissert
#x27;t apply because I'm minor aged :(. Cheers, -- Atomo64 - Raphael Please avoid sending me Word, PowerPoint or Excel attachments. See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#469258: PTS/DDPO should include bugs tagged as release-goals in statistics

2008-03-04 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Package: qa.debian.org Severity: wishlist User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: pts ddpo Hi, I discovered that the DDPO mails promoted the release-goals bugs that affect one's packages. I find this great. We need the same information in the PTS and in the DDPO web page. One idea might be to integrat

Re: Sourceforge redirector proxy thing broken?

2008-03-21 Thread Raphael Geissert
body please make the redirector use header("Location: http://garr.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/$project";); Cheers, -- Atomo64 - Raphael Please avoid sending me Word, PowerPoint or Excel attachments. See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Bug#453487: Severity of "should this package be orphaned/removed" bugs

2008-03-27 Thread Raphael Geissert
ince yesterday I began reassign the reports to package,wnpp and retitling them without dropping the severity of the report. Cheers, -- Atomo64 - Raphael Please avoid sending me Word, PowerPoint or Excel attachments. See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email

RFC: bapase changes

2008-03-31 Thread Raphael Geissert
h_upstream]) * 2 When scoring orphaned packages: score += (CURDATE - $dehs[pkg][last_in_sync_with_upstream]) Comments, suggestions, all welcome. P.D. please review the code because I haven't, really, programmed in ruby so I can't say for sure that the code I wrote is ok. Cheers, -

Re: RFC: bapase changes

2008-04-01 Thread Raphael Geissert
y. Cheers, -- Atomo64 - Raphael Please avoid sending me Word, PowerPoint or Excel attachments. See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: RFH: bapase

2008-04-01 Thread Raphael Geissert
Hi, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > Are some people interested? (I don't see any reason why they would need > to be DDs) As expected, I'm in (though I've already been working on it ;) Cheers, -- Atomo64 - Raphael Please avoid sending me Word, PowerPoint or Excel attachments

Re: RFH: piuparts testing of the archive

2008-04-08 Thread Raphael Geissert
think there was some tool around to build a dependency tree out of a Packages, so the main part of the log processing tool is already done. Cheers, Raphael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#481315: PTS could avoid duplicate copies of messages

2008-05-15 Thread Raphael Hertzog
user [EMAIL PROTECTED] usertag 481315 + pts tag 481315 + wontfix thanks On Thu, 15 May 2008, Loïc Minier wrote: > It would be easier if we could simply subscribe to the PTS of all > packages all the time, but the PTS would exclude the Maintainer: from > the subscribers when sending emails which

Bug#481477: Same with other packages

2008-05-16 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hello, On Fri, 16 May 2008, Michael Meskes wrote: > It seems as if the scripts are not able to access the bug tracking > system anymore (key changes?). There are quite a lot of bugs not > correctly listed. No, it's just that the file /org/bugs.debian.org/spool/index.db.realtime on merkel is no mo

Bug#482102: qa.debian.org: intelligent listing of debian/patches, git/quilt v3 format packages, etc

2008-05-21 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Tue, 20 May 2008, sean finney wrote: > my proposal is that the current "patches" section on a source package's > qa package is modified so that the following information is somehow > provided, where appropriate (depending on structure/format of source > package naturally). > > - - entire "debia

Bug#482102: qa.debian.org: intelligent listing of debian/patches, git/quilt v3 format packages, etc

2008-05-21 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Wed, 21 May 2008, sean finney wrote: > > Various other considerations that I'd like to add: > > - make it cross-distro from the beginning so that it can contain patches > > from multiple distributions (ie each patch is associated with one or > > more distros) > > interesting. i don't see a

on mass bug reassigning

2008-05-24 Thread Raphael Geissert
kage maintainers before doing it. Sincerely, -- Atomo64 - Raphael Please avoid sending me Word, PowerPoint or Excel attachments. See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: on mass bug reassigning

2008-05-25 Thread Raphael Geissert
version", or if more than one affected version: "reassign package \n found version ..."). * Reach a concensus on whether maintainers should be contacted before MBR (waiting a specific number of days for their reply before going ahead), or not. Any other ideas? Cheers, - -

Re: on mass bug reassigning

2008-05-25 Thread Raphael Geissert
Luk Claes wrote: > Raphael Geissert wrote: > >> I currently don't have enough time to write a script that gathers the >> versions information from the origin package to use when MBR. But here is >> what I believe needs to be done: >> >> * Encourage pack

Bug#483179: PTS: please link to Ubuntu Launchpad bugs page

2008-05-28 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Wed, 28 May 2008, Joerg Jaspert wrote: > On 11399 March 1977, Sandro Tosi wrote: > > >> *I* wouldnt want that, for the simple reason that its an overview about > >> your package in Debian, not "Debian + any possible derivative where > >> people would like a link to". > > Ok, but then why on the

Bug#484873: packages.qa.debian.org: should it still list oldstable?

2008-06-07 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hi, On Sat, 07 Jun 2008, Christian Perrier wrote: > As of now, oldstable is no longer supported (security-wise). > > I wonder whether it should still be listed on p.q.d.o pages in such > situations, which might be misleading to out users. The PTS is mostly static and it's painful to make stuff a

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >