Hi
On 12-09-18 18:35, Niels Thykier wrote:
> We should probably have *some* marker in tracker for this case.
I think tracker is just slow at picking up new packages for excuses.
https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=r-cran-snakecase should always
up-to-date within the hour.
Paul
signature
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: britney
Severity: wishlist
Owner: elb...@debian.org
Hi Raphael,
On 13-09-18 09:15, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Sep 2018, Paul Gevers wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> On 12-09-18 18:35, Niels
Hi,
On Thu, 17 Jan 2019 08:28:24 + "M. Zhou" wrote:
> Please display CI status for packages in contrib/non-free sections.
>
> For example, ci.d.o keeps running autopkgtest for zfs-linux and
> intel-mkl on Debian testing, but the result is not displayed on my DDPO
> page[1].
>
> https://ci.d
Hi Andreas,
On 01-04-2020 15:23, Andreas Tille wrote:
> If this information is really missing (and I did not just missed it
> inside the current UDD) where is the best source to parse metadata to
> fetch this information into UDD?
It depends what you look for. If you're concerned about failures t
Hi Andreas,
On 05-04-2020 16:34, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> On Thu, Apr 02, 2020 at 05:20:54PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
>> It depends what you look for. If you're concerned about failures that
>> will impact migration, the canonical place is:
>> ht
Hi Andreas,
On 08-04-2020 22:17, Andreas Tille wrote:
>>> for all source packages (in the same way as for deepnano) which seems to
>>> be no straightforward way. I wonder whether you could drop some easily
>>> parsable file containing
>>>
>>> source architecturepassversion version_th
Hi Andreas,
On 09-04-2020 22:53, Andreas Tille wrote:
> valid_keys = ( 'run_id',
> # 'created_at', # Paul Gevers: should be ignored
> # 'updated_at', # Paul Gevers: should be ignored
>
Hi Andreas,
On 15-04-2020 22:45, Andreas Tille wrote:
> autodep8-python3 PASS (superficial)
superficial is translated to neutral. As is FAIL (flaky).
Paul
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi Andreas,
On 16-04-2020 10:09, Andreas Tille wrote:
>> superficial is translated to neutral. As is FAIL (flaky).
>
> H, what exactly means "superficial".
Please read the documentation:
https://salsa.debian.org/ci-team/autopkgtest/raw/master/doc/README.package-tests.rst
> Are all those
>
Package: qa.debian.org
User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: udd
Hi,
On 21-05-2022 10:00, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
If you're doing this kind of filing, perhaps also send an email to
maintainers?
Yes, I should. But sometimes I forget that context gets lost, most often
I remembe
Control: user qa.debian.org
Control: usertag -1 udd.debian.org
Hi Simon,
On 19-05-2022 13:58, Paul Gevers wrote:
dkms and nvidia-graphics-drivers-tesla-470 currently have RC bug #1010884
triggering autoremovals (it was closed today, so maybe it will cease
to be
relevant soon).
Turns out
Hi,
On 25-05-2022 22:09, Paul Gevers wrote:
While not having figured out where the bug exactly lies (I mean, which
lines of code), I think it's important to note that the
src:nvidia-settings (in main) is building a bin:nvidia-settings in
contrib. This is allowed by policy, but I think th
I like the UDD webpage, but saw that the links to Ubuntu are out-dated. Please
find attached the changes that I think are necessary to bring udd.debian.org
up-to-date.
Paul
---
web/bugs.cgi |3 ++-
.../attic/sources_in_ubuntu_but_not_in_d
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
I recently added a testsuite to my package winff, which now fails on
it [1]. It would be great if that would be visible on the pts [2].
[1] http://ci.debian.net/#package/winff
[2] http://packages.qa.debian.
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: minor
User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: udd
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Thanks for supporting feeds for the TODO list on https://udd.debian.org/dmd/.
However, I constantly get "new" feeds because on every pull the
pubdate of ite
Package: tracker.debian.org
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
My package cacti has a release in old-lts. Under "versions" [1] there is a link
to [2], which gives the following error:
"two or more packages specified (cacti squeeze-lts)".
I don't know what (if it exi
On 07-11-14 15:23, Holger Levsen wrote:
> the log says:
>
> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> fp-units-multimedia : Depends: fp-units-multimedia-2.6.0 (= 2.6.0-9) but it
> is not going to be installed
> fpc-2.6.0 : Depends: fp-units-multimedia-2.6.0 (>= 2.6.0-9) but it is not
>
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
I tried to go from https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?email=elbrus%40debian.org
to my Dashboard via the link provided at the top of the page, however
that failed because the link is not correct.
The link on
Package: tracker.debian.org
Version: 2016-12-05
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
I (elbrus) just tried to use the "Modify keywords" button on my subscription
page to reduce the list to only bts for the motif package. After every "Save
changes" the list was restored
Hi Raphaël
On 06-12-16 09:23, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Mon, 05 Dec 2016, Paul Gevers wrote:
>> I (elbrus) just tried to use the "Modify keywords" button on my subscription
>> page to reduce the list to only bts for the motif package. After every "Save
>> c
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: minor
User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
The Debian Maintainer Dashboard at ¹ has a link for the accessibility team TODO
list. However, we, the accessibility team, are migrating the maintainer address
in our pac
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Multiple of my packages do not have a proper URL to watch. Lintian suggest to
add a watch file with comments, and uscan handles those gracefully. UDD
turns them into an
Hi,
On 11/28/24 08:32, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
I'm tempted to close it, but I'll CC debian-release to see if someone
managing britney has any clue... (I guess release.debian.org would be the
right package if we wanted to reassign).
We make the results available with a cron job which runs at :30
Hi,
On 11/28/24 11:00, Julian Gilbey wrote:
We had issues on ci.d.n last week, which also led to britney1 bailing out
because there were no results.
I guess it was those problems that caused the issue, then. (Just to
clarify, in this case, the results hadn't been transferred from ci.d.n
to br
24 matches
Mail list logo
