for
strange/buggy case.
Thanks,
Patrice
the available result.
Regards,
Patrice
On Fri, 9 Aug 2019 11:26:36 +0300 =?UTF-8?B?T3R0byBLZWvDpGzDpGluZW4=?= <
o...@debian.org> wrote:
> Package: qa.debian.org
> Severity: wishlist
>
> The page https://qa.debian.org/cgi-bin/vcswatch currently lists stats
> about what V
that it should be possible to get a view with also the other values
(I&N, etc.)?
Thanks,
Patrice
ps: by the way, my current SQL query
SELECT JSON_AGG(t.*) FROM (SELECT
source,version,date,COALESCE(all_bugs,0),COALESCE(rc_bugs,0),COALESCE(insts,0),C
OALESCE(vote,0)
FROM upload_history
JOIN (SELE
onent and
not to grow the list of the QA related links that does not content Trends nor
Janitor! :-)
Regards,
Patrice
Title: DebiAntiq
DebiAntiq - The Debian Antiquities
Some «old» packages in unstable
The packages in the table have not been uploaded for at least 3 years.
The data fi
ot to
many!)?
Working on DUCK?
Improve lintian / lintian-brush?
...
Regards,
Patrice
://trends.debian.net/) and Debian Code Search (
https://codesearch.debian.net/) are not in the list 'Wiki Page of the Debian QA
Group', is it voluntary?
Also how this list is related to: https://wiki.debian.org/Services
Thanks,
Patrice
Hi,
I am surprised to find multiple entries for a given package and
architecture having different versions
in a specific (same distribution, release, component) source index file.
For instance:
curl -s https://ftp.debian.org/debian/dists/experimental/main/source/Sources.xz
| xzgrep -A 7 "Package:
swers again!
Cheers,
Patrice
n.org/pkg/beav
It seems to me that it has not been "touched" (in the broad sense) for a while:
http://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/b/beav/?C=M;O=A
I know there are Debian CI and Reproducible which surely do a regular check.
Thank you for your patience,
Patrice
Hi,
I would have helped more but looking in the source code of
jenkins.debian.net, I could not understand why the 'Tested suite' list
is sorted differently than in the other pages.
Regards,
Patrice
nd
> the fix does not change the ordering on the individual package pages,
> where experimental is listed first, if the pkg is in experimental
> (which I think makes sense there and not not elsewhere.)
Sure.
Thanks,
Patrice
notify on this?
But moreover using the CodeSearch form, it is not easy using the literal search.
For instance 2&>1 gives some result whereas &>1 does not. Is there a
bug or does such a query go beyond some limit?
Regards,
Patrice
on a écrit :
>
> On Tue, 28 Feb 2023 15:51:20 +0100, Patrice wrote:
> > I tried using Debian CodeSearch to look for
> > other possible wrong cases like those and here is for instance a list
> > of candidates to check:
> > https://codesearch.debian.net/search?q=%5B12%
Sorry.
So I should have split this work into two patches and then sent one to
linux-perf-user and the other one to linux-kselftest.
Would it be possible to send an email to these (sub)lists with just a
ref to my first post then or do I really have to split the patch etc.?
Any script to magically do
handle some of those?
But it sure would be a good thing.
Le mer. 1 mars 2023 à 18:06, James Addison a écrit :
>
> On Wed, 1 Mar 2023 at 15:53, Patrice Duroux wrote:
> >
> > Great, I will give a look at shellcheck.
>
> Thanks - if it can also detect these problems, then --
Sorry but the title of my message is wrong: s/having/that should have/
So stupid to create bad noise in the message archives.
Thanks Bart Martens!
ps: more MR or issues have been submitted upstream (sup-mail, plptools, vice)
Le mar. 28 févr. 2023 à 15:51, Patrice Duroux
a écrit :
>
&
this related to the Debian packaging/policy?
Should it be worth minimizing at some point?
Thanks,
Patrice
idea.
;-)
Many thanks,
Patrice
Sorry maybe I wasn't clear enough, but my purpose was more to track packages
facing such cases (a subset of my first pattern):
chiark-scripts: /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/fishdescriptor/__init__.py
chiark-scripts: /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/fishdescriptor/indonor.py
gtimelog: /usr/lib
it be then an issue addressed to such packages (here: pipewire)?
Because piuparts consider it to pass, so PTS does not notify anything.
Regards,
Patrice
rning: user X may still exist."
fi
fi
or what could be a nicer solution.
One of my main points here is that a sysadmin may not be notified by
the remaining user/group
when just a 'command not found' was avoided by (deluser/delgroup ... || true)
Cheers,
Patrice
(*) there ma
ommunicating" \
"with debconf database" >&2
Is there something about this in Debian Policy?
(I checked this section:
https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-binary.html#maintainer-scripts)
Thanks,
Patrice
error.
Regards,
Patrice
://udd.debian.org/udd-status.cgi
Finally, Is this expected?
udd=> select * from upstream_status;
ERROR: invalid byte sequence for encoding "UTF8": 0xf6 0x6c 0x6c 0xe4
Many thanks,
Patrice
UDD, it have already the upstream version 12.0.1 in its data.
Thanks,
Patrice
Hi,
I do not know if this is something already addressed.
Otherwise could it be interesting to handle such a situation in a
Debian QA perspective?
Regards,
Patrice
$ apt-file search environ.7.gz
manpages: /usr/share/man/man7/environ.7.gz
manpages-cs: /usr/share/man/cs/man7/environ.7.gz
ble testing
unstable testing stable
unstable unstable
unstable=20
woody-proposed-updates unstable
(32 lignes)
I am then not sure about the consistency of another SQL query based on
this column value.
Regards,
Patrice
web/cgi-bin/mentors.cgi:if l['distribution'] == 'unstable'
web/cgi-bin/mentors.cgi:elsif l['distribution'] == 'experimental'
web/cgi-bin/mentors.cgi: puts "#{l['distribution']}"
And here it is the 'mentors_most_recent_packag
Hi Lucas,
My curiosity sometimes pushes me to look at the list of packages that haven't
been uploaded to the archive both in unstable and experimental releases in more
than a certain number of years. And UDD is so useful for that!!
Many thanks,
Patrice
-master/experimental,experimental 8.4.0-1~exp1 all
puppet-master/unstable,unstable 7.9.5-2 all
Regards,
Patrice
Thanks!
My point is more on this fact:
is this a consequence of the fact that both src:puppet (6.16.0-1) and
src:puppetserver (8.4.0-1~exp1) are in experimental? And if this is
the case, why should the former still be there?
for instance
https://lists.debian.org/debian-x/2024/02/msg00059.html)
Regards,
Patrice
not-found inactive dead mysql.target
Do I have to check for each (right) package and submit an issue?
Is piuparts checking this?
Regards,
Patrice
ackage 'alsa-utils' is not installed and no information is
available
Use dpkg --info (= dpkg-deb --info) to examine archive files.
This package was installed but removed days ago (many reboots since then).
Thanks,
Patrice
ps: on my side, everything started with hacking the following:
m | cut -d '/' -f
2 | sort -u
13.10
13.11.1
13.11.4
13.11.6
13.11.7
13.11.8
13.11.9
13.13
13.14.1
13.15.2
13.15.3
When to decided to rebuild a package (binnmu sort of) due to a possible DH
trouble?
For a given (old)stable release, is this more homogeneous? Under control by any
QA tool?
Regards,
Patrice
@@ARCHIVE_EXT@+|
|
|
To me this is for the same d/watch file content but one reporting an error
and the other one not, or do I have to check another UDD column than 'errors'?
In other words,how can I retrieve a list of packages with a watch
failure in DPT?
Best,
Patrice
|
(2 lignes)
Le lun. 22 juil. 2024 à 20:37, Patrice Duroux
a écrit :
>
> HI,
>
> After the (very) recent upload of xorgxrdp (version1:0.10.0-2),
> I was curious to check both DPT and UDD about it.
> But currently DPT shows me:
>
> Problems while searching for a new upstr
refreshes it
>
> So in the normal case, approximately 30 mins after the mirror push, you
> should have correct uscan information in UDD.
>
> Since I don't know about DPT, I cannot help on that side.
>
> Lucas
>
>
> On 22/07/24 at 20:43 +0200, Patrice Duro
Hi,
xorgxrdp at Salsa is still on the previous version and using a clone
here is what I am getting:
$ git clone https://salsa.debian.org/debian-remote-team/xorgxrdp.git
$ cd xorgxrdp
$ uscan
uscan warn: In debian/watch no matching files for watch line
https://github.com/neutrinolabs/xorgxrdp/re
information present in UDD to see if it
contains all the data to define queries that may address such
evaluation.
Best regards,
Patrice
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Arc
://tracker.debian.org/pkg/tinysvm
https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/poti
https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/libtaverna2-server-java
Is there any clean-up process? Or anything useful to do?
Regards,
Patrice
?).
Best regards,
Patrice
[0] to get an AND in place of an OR regarding bugs.source clause in
the following UDD query.
select id, bugs.package, bugs.source, severity, title, last_modified,
status, affects_stable, affects_testing, affects_unstable,
affects_experimental
from bugs
where id in (select id
corresponding Ubuntu package for this Debian package.
Thanks,
Patrice
Package Tracker:
https://tracker.debian.org/teams/pkg-games/
when a team is involved?
I don't know yet how to correlate in this case the 'pkg-games-
de...@lists.alioth.debian.org' login
and the 'teams/pkg-games' path, because all the other links are based on this
login value.
Thanks,
Patrice
44 matches
Mail list logo
