Ana Guerrero schrieb:
> On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 01:40:49AM +0200, Ana Guerrero wrote:
>> I filed the quoted report almost 3 weeks ago. Resending to people listed as
>> eclipse uploaders in case they did not get it.
>>
>
> Third and last warning, I will orphan eclipse next saturday (20th June), so
Package: qa.debian.org
as seen on
https://qa.debian.org/cgi-bin/vcswatch?package=gcc-8
vcswatch cannot analyze repositories maintained on a branch
Package: tracker.debian.org
https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/gcc-8-cross
shows:
excuses:
Migrates after: gcc-8
Too young, only 1 of 5 days old
Waiting for piuparts test results (stalls migration) -
https://piuparts.debian.org/sid/source/g/gcc-8-cross.html
cpp-8-aarch64-linux-gnu/amd64 has Built-Usi
Package: tracker.debian.org
looking at https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/ariba, all "action needed" items
expand to one or two items, and expanding the item doesn't show much more
information. But you have to click three more times to get this information.
Please can you show this information by defa
Package: tracker.debian.org
the tracker page lists binaries (on the lower left side) which are in the
control file, but not in the archive. Seen with the gcc-9-cross-ports package,
where some packages were in the control file, accepted in an upload which went
through NEW. Yes, that's a mist
Package: tracker.debian.org
https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/bambam shows failed tests, and following the link
shows:
unstable testingstable
amd64 1.0.1+dfsg-1 fail 1.0.2+dfsg-2 pass No test data
The test result for the unstable test is out-of-date. Accoding to #debc
: 0.73-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group
Changed-By: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
python-gendoc - Documentation generation from Python source files.
Closes: 95954
Changes:
python-gendoc (0.73-5) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Orphaned p
so we do have to provide all these man pages and manage them with
alternatives among all the shells?
sounds like a mess to maintain.
Colin Watson writes:
> Here's a list of man pages and the names that don't appear anywhere in the
> filesystem:
>
> usr/share/man/man1/builtins.1.gz: .
>
bells, whistles and packages for woody.
Matthias Klose (and Gregor Hoffleit).
a current
Python version with bells, whistles and packages for woody.
Matthias Klose (and Gregor Hoffleit).
[I don't agree with the severity level of bug #22783, asking for a fix
in the hamm release. See http://www.debian.org/Bugs/db/22/22783-b.html
as well]
The recent upload of python 1.5.1-4 didn't fix this bug. I really
consider this bug as important, so the severity level should be
upgraded to i
[Having contacted the bash maintainer without getting a response, I
think that's the right place to post ...]
bash-2.03 is available since February, but not in Debian. I had
problems with bash-2.02.1, which seem to be resolved with bash-2.03
and made a basic 2.03 Debian package. Are there concern
Torsten Landschoff writes:
> On Mon, Nov 15, 1999 at 07:52:16PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> I think we should perhaps wait some days longer before finally uploading it
> but an announcement to -devel(-announce) referencing a download location
> might give the new bash a better testing before
Christian Kurz writes:
> > Package: libg++2.8.2-dev (main)
> > Maintainer: Debian EGCS maintainers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > 50048 libg++2.8.2-dev: empty package on sparc
>
> When will the package become removed as stated in the BTS?
There exists a bug filed against ftp.debian.org.
> > Pa
Adam Heath writes:
> On Tue, 30 Nov 1999, Christian Kurz wrote:
>
> > > > > Package: libg++272 (main)
> > > > > Maintainer: Debian GCC maintainers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > 47212 [m68k] libg++272_2.7.2.8-1 build failure
> > > >
> > > > Here we need the help from the M68K-Team t
Santiago Vila writes:
> On Mon, 20 Dec 1999, Branden Robinson wrote:
>
> > Matthias, you might want to re-upload bash and libreadlineg2 with either a
> > Depends: base-files (>> 2.1.11)
> > or a
> > Conflicts: base-files (<= 2.1.11)
> >
> > They currently depend on base-files (>= 2.1.12),
Package: tunnelv
Version: 1.00-2
Severity: normal
The tunnelv package depends on an old version of the stdc++ library:
Please recompile the package, such that the current libstdc++2.10
library is used.
This bug report should be considered important, if the package
contains a library.
If the pac
> - 13 consecutive NMUs.
> > > - last maintainer upload dates 7 months ago.
> > >
> > > Do you still want to maintain this package? If you don't, I suggest that
> > > we
> > > either orphan it or find another maintainer.
> > >
&g
Martin Michlmayr writes:
> * Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-02-27 14:14]:
> > The question is: Should we wait for someone to adopt it or remove it
> > from unstable? (I would go for removal)
>
> Removal is probably the best, but please give doko a few days to
> comment since he knows
Frank Lichtenheld writes:
> On Sat, Feb 28, 2004 at 11:55:14AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > Martin Michlmayr writes:
> > > * Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-02-27 14:14]:
> > > > The question is: Should we wait for someone to adopt it or remove i
Is it possible to add a new/unknown user name just to display
information about a set packages, which I explicitely add to the list
using the control bot?
Matthias
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GFDL1.2olfc] contains non-free documentation
> Package: libstdc++6-4.0-doc (required; Debian GCC Maintainers et al.)
> [gcc-4.0/4.0.2-9 ; 4.0.2-10] [add/edit comment]
> 321780 [ ] [NONFREE-DOC:GFDL1.1] contains non-free documentation
>
> These bugs were reconfirmed as RC by t
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
while looking at
https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?email=android-tools-devel%40lists.alioth.debian.org
to see why this stack didn't migrate (both in Debian and Ubuntu), I tried to
ensure first that all packages were up-to-date in Ubuntu. However this
On 07.03.2016 09:29, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 07/03/16 at 06:07 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
while looking at
https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?email=android-tools-devel%40lists.alioth.debian.org
to see why this stack didn't migrate (both in D
Package: qa.debian.org
Looking at https://packages.qa.debian.org/g/gcc-5-cross-ports.html
this is just too noisy, and known. Would it be possible to disable that warning
for any -cross package? We only have these for linux headers, glibc and GCC.
Package: tracker.debian.org
See for example https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/python3-defaults
currently shows regressions for
cysignals
gpaw
jupyter-sphinx-theme
pillow
pyresample
python-biom-format
[...]
at least the failures for gpaw and pyresample have other reasons, which requir
Package: tracker.debian.org
please bump the Ubuntu links from bionic to cosmic, showing the package versions
for the most recent Ubuntu development version.
27 matches
Mail list logo
