Re: Quality Assurance Group mini-policy

1999-06-06 Thread Craig Brozefsky
o real wait, it does indeed present a different understanding of what maintainers need to do to retain their maintainership of a package than the rest of the policy documents, and should be re-examined. -- Craig Brozefsky<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Less matter, more form! - Bruno Schul

Re: Quality Assurance Group mini-policy

1999-06-07 Thread Craig Brozefsky
tion indicate that Project Leader Delegates can make such decisions. They do not need to have that power granted to them in order to accomplish their task. -- Craig Brozefsky<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Less matter, more form! - Bruno Schulz ignazz, I am truly korrupted by yore sinful

Re: Quality Assurance Group mini-policy

1999-06-07 Thread Craig Brozefsky
; Quality Assurance members by definition should have the right to fix > bugs in the distribution, don't you agree? That is what the NMUs already give them tho, any developer has this ability. This is why I think there is no reason to give special "rights" to the QA team pres