Bug#511234: qa.debian.org: DEHS: upstream tarball releases could be put into a feed

2009-01-08 Thread Asheesh Laroia
Package: qa.debian.org Severity: wishlist It would be nice to be able to subscribe to a feed with the latest results of uscan, as run by DEHS. Initially I thought this might be best done in conjunction with the PTS's existing RSS feed; now I'm not totally sure. -- System Information: Debian Re

Re: Denemo 0.8.12-1

2010-02-15 Thread Asheesh Laroia
On Mon, 15 Feb 2010, Pietro Battiston wrote: Please discard the previous email. I had unfortunately not noticed that the orphaning bug had changed to a ITP and that there is a new maintainer that has already done a big (duplicated, sigh) work and will soon search a sponsor. Sorry to hear about

Re: [Help] Need help of Python / I18N expert for getting DDTP translations into UDD (again)

2010-07-06 Thread Asheesh Laroia
On Tue, 22 Jun 2010, Andreas Tille wrote: Hi, since a longer time the ddtp gatherer for UDD fails to import for some strange encoding problem and I do not have the slightest idea how to fix this. The fact is that DDTP people claim to have not changed anything at the time when the job started t

Re: Debian QA meeting ?

2010-11-03 Thread Asheesh Laroia
On Tue, 2 Nov 2010, Ralf Treinen wrote: Hi, what about having again a debian QA meeting? If I am not mistaken the last ones were in november/december 2006, 2007, and 2008. There is interest on the debian-mentors list for having a *virtual* debian-qa meeting on IRC. Is there someone on this

Re: Debian QA meeting ?

2010-11-12 Thread Asheesh Laroia
On Wed, 3 Nov 2010, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: On 03/11/10 at 12:54 -0400, Asheesh Laroia wrote: On Tue, 2 Nov 2010, Ralf Treinen wrote: Hi, what about having again a debian QA meeting? If I am not mistaken the last ones were in november/december 2006, 2007, and 2008. There is interest on the

Re: Debian QA meeting ?

2010-11-13 Thread Asheesh Laroia
On Sat, 13 Nov 2010, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: On 13/11/10 at 01:52 -0500, Asheesh Laroia wrote: On Wed, 3 Nov 2010, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: On 03/11/10 at 12:54 -0400, Asheesh Laroia wrote: On Tue, 2 Nov 2010, Ralf Treinen wrote: Hi, what about having again a debian QA meeting? If I am not

Bug#966649: Taking a look

2020-08-16 Thread Asheesh Laroia
Just a quick note that I'm taking a look at this. It seems to me that accessing the mbox data is mildly annoying, and that the same data is available by the public archives (in HTML form), so for my own development convenience, I'm going to rewrite this code to be based on the public HTML archives

Bug#966649: Request for feedback on upload_history re-implementation

2020-08-19 Thread Asheesh Laroia
Hi Andreas & Lucas & all, Lucas -- I'm making progress on re-implementing this. I'd love your input by email or IRC about my approach, but if you're busy, feel free to ignore this and I'll mention you again when I submit a patch. Andreas -- The codebase at https://github.com/paulproteus/debian-de

Bug#966649: Request for feedback on upload_history re-implementation

2020-08-20 Thread Asheesh Laroia
On Thu, Aug 20, 2020, 05:45 Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Hi Asheesh, > Hi! :) > > I think that the changes compared to the current table structure should > be minimized, to avoid rewrite all tools that use this data. > Improvements are welcomed of course, but please don't make changes if > there's

Bug#966649: Request for feedback on upload_history re-implementation

2020-08-20 Thread Asheesh Laroia
Hi Lucas! I'm rereading this, and I have a follow-up question. It looks to me, based on reading the bug carefully, that /srv/ udd.debian.org/email-archives/debian-devel-changes/debian-devel-changes.current on ullmann successfully receives any new emails to debian-devel-changes. Is that accurate?

Bug#966649: Request for feedback on upload_history re-implementation

2020-08-21 Thread Asheesh Laroia
Great! It sounds to me like if we use the *mtime* of /srv/ udd.debian.org/email-archives/debian-devel-changes/debian-devel-changes.current (but not its contents), that would smoothly and solidly overcome the worries about unnecessary polling. If the file's mtime is the same as the last time the to

Bug#966649: Request for feedback on upload_history re-implementation

2020-08-22 Thread Asheesh Laroia
Hi Andreas! You noticed that the date column was an integer. That's fixed now; if you update from git, and if you delete upload_history.sqlite on your machine, and re-run the tool, the upload_history column will use a datetime for the date column. It won't do many HTTP queries, so it's peaceful to

Bug#966649: Merge request for minimal, tested Python 3 port

2020-08-23 Thread Asheesh Laroia
Hi all, I submitted a merge request here with code that should work for a Python 3 port: https://salsa.debian.org/qa/udd/-/merge_requests/26 It relies on the current approach: rsync'd historic mboxes & a .current mbox. It should operate identically to the bitrotted munge_ddc.py. Good advice, Luca

Re: Public UDD mirror offline?

2021-12-30 Thread Asheesh Laroia
Hi! Oh bother. I've been on vacation a bunch lately, and I missed some emails. Mattia, I'll try to directly reach out to you now, plus see what I can do. Best wishes and happy holidays, Asheesh On Thu, Dec 30, 2021, 1:26 PM Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Thu, Dec 30, 2021 at 01:18:58PM -0500, Sa

Re: Proposal for collaborative maintenance of packages

2005-12-19 Thread Asheesh Laroia
On Mon, 19 Dec 2005, Stephan Hermann wrote: What you are suggesting is already there. It's called "hct" and it's keybuks child. So, seeing this in an environment of Ubuntu: I think (or I hope) hct will be included in launchpad, and then we will include some parts of REVU3 (I hope :)) into laun

Bug#706678: status of mentors.d.n data in UDD

2013-06-27 Thread Asheesh Laroia
On Thu, 27 Jun 2013, Paul Wise wrote: On Thu, 2013-06-27 at 08:56 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: I made some progress on importing mentors.d.n data in UDD. Rather than importing the Sources file, I imported the SQL data directly, in mentors_raw_* tables, providing a mentors_most_recent_package_v

Bug#702085: I am going to attempt to execute these instructions

2013-07-02 Thread Asheesh Laroia
Lucas: I am also working on a project where I want to use the upload_history table, so I want to fix this as well. I hope it's OK if, to implement the plan described here, I use sudo on ullmann to switch into the 'udd' user. I have very rarely logged into Debian machines, but it seems from h

Bug#702085: A report (no sudo used)

2013-07-02 Thread Asheesh Laroia
Hey all, This will probably come as no surprise to Lucas, but I can report that with the current scripts, and data copied from /home/lucas/public_html/ddc-parser on master, I can generate a reasonable upload_history table on my laptop. Given that, I'm happy to be given whatever keys are nece

Bug#702085: A report (no sudo used)

2013-07-03 Thread Asheesh Laroia
Thanks for this. I'm on the job now. Some parts are taking a while, so it might take until tomorrow to fully fix. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/alpi

Bug#702085: I have configured this to work via cron

2013-07-04 Thread Asheesh Laroia
I'll test tomorrow if it remains working, but so far, it seems reasonable. If it seems to keep working tomorrow, I will document on this bug what all I changed. Lucas, you might want me to rearrange some files/directories; I'm not sure what idioms there are with regard to /srv/udd/. -- Ashees

Re: [UDD] Uncommited change in production stage UDD

2013-07-04 Thread Asheesh Laroia
Yes, please do commit this change if you can. Thanks! I am typing from my phone, or else I would ssh in and commit. The idea here is simply to slightly reconfigure the upload-history job. Andreas Tille wrote: >Hi, > >on udd.debian.org:/srv/udd.debian.org/udd I found the following >uncommited c

Bug#702085: debian-devel-changes is importing correctly

2013-07-05 Thread Asheesh Laroia
A more full report is forthcoming. I wanted to first declare success here, and then explain how things work for benefit of later readers (or current UDD maintainers with opinions on how to change them). I created a query that conveniently limits the width of the query to <= 80 characters, to a

Bug#702085: Report on what is changed to solve this bug

2013-07-05 Thread Asheesh Laroia
Here is what I did. == Configured inbound email == I did what was suggested in the earlier comment to configure inbound emails to debian-devel-changes to arrive in /srv/udd.debian.org/incoming-mail/changes . == Copy archives to ullmann == I copied the archives on master to: /srv/udd.debian

Attempting to push a code change to UDD

2013-07-06 Thread Asheesh Laroia
b2abb03a51514e0994b34690 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Asheesh Laroia Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2013 19:15:17 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] Add a filter line to minimize noise from upload-history action This line is generated by the Makefile-based process that processes the debian-devel-changes archives. --- scr

Bug#715216: qa.debian.org: collab-qa/upload-history: Software trusts "Date" headers which are sometimes set wrong

2013-07-06 Thread Asheesh Laroia
Package: qa.debian.org Severity: normal User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: udd I've found (and reproduced) an issue in the collab-qa/upload-history code. (By that, I mean the stuff you can get from here: svn+ssh://paulprot...@svn.debian.org/svn/collab-qa/upload-history ) I was

Bug#715216: qa.debian.org: collab-qa/upload-history: Software trusts "Date" headers which are sometimes set wrong

2013-07-06 Thread Asheesh Laroia
(Sorry about a not fully formed thought on numeral 2 in the numbered list in the last message. Typing and thinking too fast.) Anyway, as an update to this: further research indicates that upload-history is simply spitting out the data from the email in a "Message-Date" field. I can't blame the

Bug#715216: qa.debian.org: collab-qa/upload-history: Software trusts "Date" headers which are sometimes set wrong

2013-07-06 Thread Asheesh Laroia
New proposed fix: In collab-qa/upload-history/munge_ddc.py , if the Message-Date we were going to emit is not within the year of the envelope From, plus/minus one year, we drop Message-Date. This permits the udd/upload_history_gatherer.py code to use its existing logic about dropping replaci

Public UDD mirror

2013-07-07 Thread Asheesh Laroia
Hey all, I started running a public UDD mirror here: http://public-udd-mirror.xvm.mit.edu/ I'll move it to be on .debian.net as the canonical URL in the near future. Other to-do items tracked here for now: https://github.com/paulproteus/public-udd-mirror/issues Happy to take questions or s

postgres on ullmann has run out of space

2013-07-08 Thread Asheesh Laroia
paulproteus@ullmann:~$ df -h /dev/mapper/vg01-var_lib_postgresql Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/mapper/vg01-var_lib_postgresql 40G 39G 8.0K 100% /var/lib/postgresql What's the right next step here? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@

Re: Public UDD mirror

2013-07-11 Thread Asheesh Laroia
On Sun, 7 Jul 2013, Asheesh Laroia wrote: Hey all, I started running a public UDD mirror here: http://public-udd-mirror.xvm.mit.edu/ I'll move it to be on .debian.net as the canonical URL in the near future. Other to-do items tracked here for now: https://github.com/paulproteus/p

Bug#715216: qa.debian.org: collab-qa/upload-history: Software trusts "Date" headers which are sometimes set wrong

2013-07-11 Thread Asheesh Laroia
On Wed, 10 Jul 2013, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: Hi Asheesh, Sorry for the delayed reply. Thanks a lot for your work on this. I've added you to collab-qa, so you should be able to push your code yourself. Yay! Thanks! Now, one comment on your changes: it would be better if everything you do is

Re: Public UDD mirror

2013-07-12 Thread Asheesh Laroia
On Fri, 12 Jul 2013, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: On 12/07/13 at 08:25 +0200, Michael Stapelberg wrote: Hi Asheesh, Asheesh Laroia writes: * Is this useful to you? If so, please make me feel good by saying so. (-; I think this is a great idea, thanks for working on it. To make it useful for me

Re: UDD mirror not returning any results

2013-09-24 Thread Asheesh Laroia
On Tue, 24 Sep 2013, Derek M Jones wrote: Hello, We chatted on irc last night. Just connected to the public UDD mirror you have kindly provided. It does not appear to be returning any results :-( I have tried something simple like: select source, section, priority from sources where release

Re: UDD mirror not returning any results

2013-09-24 Thread Asheesh Laroia
On Tue, 24 Sep 2013, Derek M Jones wrote: Asheesh, udd=> select distinct release from sources; Thanks. An obvious thing I should have checked. I will update the analysis to the latest release. Happy to hear it! -- Asheesh. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org

Bug#805648: qa.debian.org: Provide a way to share an ignore list (for team dashboard)

2015-11-21 Thread Asheesh Laroia
One option is to store data in the window.location.hash (or equivalently html5 pushstate). See e.g.: http://yuilibrary.com/yui/docs/router/ For docs on a library that uses this. This avoids server-side storage and still gives permalinkable state.

Bug#838178: tracker.debian.org: "action needed" details show only with Javascript enabled

2016-09-19 Thread Asheesh Laroia
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 2:39 AM, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > On Sun, 18 Sep 2016, Thomas Schmitt wrote: > > When i discussed the hint on debian-mentors i got the advise to file > > a bug because the detail information is supposed to be visible without > > toggle if the browser has no Javascript enab

Re: Bug in UDD?

2016-10-19 Thread Asheesh Laroia
Hi Eriberto, If you find that you can't access official UDD, you can also consider using this public mirror that Mattia Rizzolo maintains: http://public-udd-mirror.xvm.mit.edu/ I originally started it, so you can call me a co-maintainer. On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 10:14 AM, Eriberto Mota wrote: >

Re: ci.debian.net offline

2016-10-25 Thread Asheesh Laroia
When I look at services like this, and I think about how strongly I feel Debian benefits from automation, I feel a lot of gratitude. Thanks so much for taking care of this service, Antonio! On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 3:33 PM, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 10:14:54PM -0200, Anto