Bug#902821: qa.debian.org: Asian (JP, CH) input impossible, when locale is not Asian (LANG=en_US, etc)

Package: qa.debian.org Severity: important Tags: l10n Dear Maintainer, *** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate *** * What led up to the situation? Installing Debian9/Gnome with US English locales/UI, or changing locales/UI from Japanese to US English * Wh

Bug#640269: JavaScript error on PTS pages in Internet Explorer <= 8

Package: qa.debian.org Severity: minor Pages such as http://packages.qa.debian.org/e/eglibc.html produce a JS error in Internet Explorer 6, 7 and 8 (but not in 9) on the page load: Object required, line 43, char 9. File http://packages.qa.debian.org/common/pts.js -- System Information: Debian R

Re: Removed packages handling

On Mon, Feb 01, 2021 at 11:57:49AM +0100, benatt...@gezapig.nl benatt...@gezapig.nl wrote: > I wonder if removed packages should go to Debian QA Group. What do you mean? -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: Re: Removed packages handling

On Mon, Feb 01, 2021 at 01:49:56PM +0100, benatt...@gezapig.nl benatt...@gezapig.nl wrote: > These are abandoned packages no one cares for. > Also all orphaned packages should go to Debian QA Group. > Seems logic to me. > > What is harder to find are the realy orphaned packages that also exist, t

Re: Debian Trends updated

On Thu, Apr 08, 2021 at 09:06:46AM +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > > - source format 1.0 with direct changes in .diff.gz (no patch system) > > Also dpatch. And also 1.0+quilt (ugh). ! What's left then? Only packages that don't patch the upstream sources at all? -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Desc

Re: Can't create Debian bug tracker account

On Sun, Nov 07, 2021 at 07:20:09PM +, van snyder wrote: > I tried to register a Debian bug tracker account. There is no such thing. > The error I tried to report Please follow https://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting Also, the user support mailing list is debian-user@. > is that the newest lib

Re: pchar is marked for autoremoval from testing

On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 07:55:06AM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > The pchar package build depend on "debhelper-compat (= 10), quilt, > libsnmp-dev" and the binary package depend on "libc6 (>= 2.15), libgcc1 > (>= 1:3.0), libstdc++6 (>= 5)". How is this related to > nvidia-graphics-drivers-tes

Re: Taking over maintenance of packages

On Sun, May 29, 2022 at 11:29:42PM +0100, Keiran Harcombe wrote: > Hi there, > > Wondered if you could help me. I've recently been appointed by the GNU > Project to take over maintenance of the Freedink package. > > What would the process be for picking up the maintenance of the following > packa

Re: a naive question about EOL encoding in Debian

On Sat, Mar 18, 2023 at 08:45:37PM +0100, Patrice Duroux wrote: > Hi, > > I am facing ^M (\r) character in the .build output file using sbuild > on my system (Sid). > For instance: > > $ file timidity_2.14.0-9_amd64-2023-03-18T18:33:37Z.build > timidity_2.14.0-9_amd64-2023-03-18T18:33:37Z.build:

Re: small questions

On Sat, Jun 24, 2023 at 01:04:13PM +0200, Patrice Duroux wrote: > Hi, > > My starting point is: > https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/libxmp > that does not show the new upstream 4.6.0 (since 2023-06-15) > and UDD says also that upstream_version is 4.5.0 and not 4.6.0 I can also confirm that uscan insi

Re: SimulIDE could (should?) be updated but seems unmaintained

On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 08:08:39PM +0200, Ben Tris wrote: > Just a notice. > > SimulIDE version 1.0.0 2023 > Debion simulide version 0.1.7 2018 > https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/simulide Yeah, it looks eligible for salvaging. That doesn't mean that anyone will do the work though.

Re: debbugs blocked since 2018 but patch from Ubuntu seems to exist since 2018

On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 07:50:47AM +0200, Ben Tris wrote: > Just a notice. > > I think debbugs is important, so thought send a message to debian-qa. Well, I assume it's not important if it wasn't uploaded since 2018. > Maybe debbugs can use some help. I assume the software that runs on bugs.d.o i

Re: about puppet in experimental

On Fri, Mar 01, 2024 at 05:47:36PM +0100, Patrice Duroux wrote: > Hi, > > Not sure where to address my point here. > > https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/puppet shows exp: 6.16.0-1 > https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/puppetserver shows exp: 8.4.0-1~exp1 > > And as both puppet and puppetserver provide t

Re: Re: about puppet in experimental

On Sat, Mar 02, 2024 at 09:49:34AM +0100, Patrice Duroux wrote: > Thanks! > My point is more on this fact: > is this a consequence of the fact that both src:puppet (6.16.0-1) and > src:puppetserver (8.4.0-1~exp1) are in experimental? No. Or what do you mean by "this"? > And if this is the case, wh

Re: Re: Re: about systemd service leftovers

On Sat, Apr 13, 2024 at 08:30:35PM +0200, Patrice Duroux wrote: > Ok so this is probably due to the version of the DHs used when generating the > postrm script during packaging. How? > On my system, the diversity is quite large regarding all the installed > packages > and the dh_installsystemd: >

Re: How can I help?

On Sun, Jun 23, 2024 at 05:56:37PM -0400, André Locas wrote: > Hi, > > I live nearby Montreal, Quebec, Canada. I am not a developer neither a > programmer. > > I am a retired Industrial Relations counselor and I was using/programming > Excel and Calc doing Pay equity programs. > > If I can be of

Re: Trying to come back

On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 10:37:07PM -0400, Barry deFreese wrote: > Hi, > > I have tried reaching out on a couple of the IRC channels and e-mailed > some people directly but I'm not having much luck. How do I go about > coming back and getting back in the keyring? I unfortunately didn't > ever upd

Re: SimulIDE could (should?) be updated but seems unmaintained

On Fri, Aug 23, 2024 at 03:21:41PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > Did anyone else see the emails 2023-12-03 and 2023-09-25 about SimulIDE? I even replied to one. -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: SimulIDE could (should?) be updated but seems unmaintained

On Fri, Aug 23, 2024 at 03:52:23PM +0200, Uwe Steinmann wrote: > Am Fri, Aug 23, 2024 at 03:21:41PM +0200 schrieb Petter Reinholdtsen: > > > > Did anyone else see the emails 2023-12-03 and 2023-09-25 about SimulIDE? > > Perhaps the original sender should get a reply from someone who know > > what

Bug#1079926: qa.debian.org: source could be updated, maybe not maintained: pcsc-cyberjack

On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 06:19:52PM +0200, Ben Tris wrote: > Thought make an bug to qa because seen #1060305 Not sure what's the logic here. > In short: > The source seems unmaintained, an update can support certain devices > with one also for users with disabilities. There is already a bug repor

Re: Re: Re: about puppet in experimental

On Tue, Mar 05, 2024 at 10:16:55PM +0100, Patrice Duroux wrote: > > so could I suggest to consider the following packages: > > https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/sump-logicanalyzer - 2011-07-27 > https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/libvirt-tck - 2011-11-13 > https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/dtc - 2012-06-08

Re: remove nuitka?

On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 10:20:58PM +0200, Salvo Tomaselli wrote: > Hello, > > Can the nuitka package be removed from debian? > > It hasn't worked in a long time. The maintainer seems MIA. https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1035782#30 -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: P

Re: Huge list of broken Vcs-Svn entries in control files

On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 07:55:44AM -0400, James McCoy wrote: > See also , > so maintainers should be aware of the problem. It's only I: -- WBR, wRAR -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "uns

Re: Strange testing migration excuse for xzgv

On Thu, Jan 02, 2014 at 10:55:32AM -0500, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > Hi, > > For the debian.qa.debian.org page[1], it states: > > excuses: >Too young, only 0 of 5 days old >Ignoring high urgency setting for NEW package >Not considered > > [1] http://packages.qa.debian.org/x/xzgv.html >

Re: removing xchat

On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 11:15:39AM +0200, Paul Wise wrote: > > Well we could also revert back to my initial plan to just remove it and > > add some notes to the release notes. But that leaves quite some people with > > a dead package around. Is that more userfriendly than a forced migration > > wi

Re: Package removed from unstable still in QA overview

On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 04:29:25PM -0400, Peter Colberg wrote: > Dear Debian QA team, > > Two months ago I requested the removal of two packages from unstable, > golang-github-square-go-jose (#828201) and golang-github-cheggaaa-pb > (#830747). The former no longer appears on my QA overview, but th

Re: Migration of libc++ weirdly blocked by already-fixed bug

On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 06:12:02PM +0800, Boyuan Yang wrote: > Excuse for libc++ > > Migration status: BLOCKED: Rejected/introduces a regression (please see > below) > Too young, only 0 of 5 days old > missing build on armel: libc++-dev, libc++-helpers, libc++-test, libc++1, > libc++

Re: Interest in joining and contributing

On Sun, Sep 29, 2024 at 06:51:02PM +, RV Ramanan wrote: > Hi, > > I have been a long time GNU/Linux user- since 2001. However, my user has been > mostly installing various distributions and using the laptops as my daily > workhorse or just for fun. > > I am not a great programmer and I coul

Bug#1103042:

On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 11:26:16AM +, c.bu...@posteo.jp wrote: I can confirm that the bug still exists. There was also no Django bug report opened about it, as mentioned before. So what need to be done to repair the RSS feed? I don't know Django and also don't know Debian's internal server

Re: Join as a QA team member

On Wed, Jun 25, 2025 at 06:28:30PM +0300, Md. Moniruzzaman Tanim wrote: Monir here. I am from Oulu, Finland. I work as a QA specialist at a Nordic Bank. I want to join your Debian QA team. Could you please let me know the process? There is no process and there is no formal QA team. -- WBR, wRA

Re: python-hpilo: Python SyntaxWarning

On Mon, Jul 14, 2025 at 01:47:34PM +0200, William Desportes wrote: Also: the Debian tracker page says unknown maintainer. Yeah, the orphaning upload broke the Maintainer field. -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: PGP signature