Hi, I came across http://qa.debian.org/orphaned.html> yesterday and
am interested in helping in any way that I can, but I am not a Debian
developer and could not find any directions to follow in the
documentation related to fixing bugs in orphaned packages. If anyone
could point me to the relevant
On Tue, 2003-10-28 at 13:10, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On 2003-10-24 13:11 -0400, Alexander Winston wrote:
> > Hi, I came across http://qa.debian.org/orphaned.html> yesterday and
> > am interested in helping in any way that I can, but I am not a Debian
> > de
scription.
* Updated to the latest Debian policy version, 3.6.1.0.
* Morphed into a native Debian package.
* Adopted by Alexander Winston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
-- Alexander Winston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sun, 02 Nov 2003
16:20:09 -0500
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Sun, 2003-11-16 at 05:08, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 11:00:21PM -0500, Alexander Winston wrote:
>
> > g5 (0.2-5) unstable; urgency=low
> > * Morphed into a native Debian package.
>
> Why?
From what I read, native Debian packages are not as
On Wed, 2003-11-26 at 11:06, Ron Murray wrote:
> At Sat, 22 Nov 2003 13:04:16 +,
> Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > [1 ]
> > On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 09:02:19AM -0600, Graham Wilson wrote:
> > > On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 12:25:24PM +0100, Martin Quinson wrote:
> > > > On Wed, N
I hereby suggest that the package named "g5" be removed from the Debian
archive. I previously considered adopting this orphaned package and
bringing it back from the dead, but now I wish to just let it rest in
peace. :)
The package depends on libgtk1.2 and the upstream sources have
disappeared. Ma
Can't this package just be removed, as 2.6.3 is now the latest stable
kernel and 2.4.25 the latest 2.4-series kernel?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
7 matches
Mail list logo
