[urgent] testing for 2.2.18 boot-floppies i386 needed

2000-10-15 Thread Adam Di Carlo
lease reply results to debian-boot. -- .Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.onShore.com/> boot-floppies (2.2.18) stable; urgency=low * NOT YET RELEASE VERSION * Adam Di Carlo: - release.sh: also put kernel configs in TOP/ (hey, it's a small file) - rootdisk.sh: ad

testing for (last?) potato boot-floppies

2001-01-24 Thread Adam Di Carlo
00) * Karl Hammar: syslinux documentation for working around a loop when downloading SCSI scripts on NCR-based HBAs * Ethan Benson: PowerPC documentation improvements (closes: Bug#69161) * Adam Di Carlo: - Makefile: fix the localfiles rule, which was breaking in some instances;

potato boot-floppies update available for testing

2001-02-14 Thread Adam Di Carlo
ased HBAs * Ethan Benson: PowerPC documentation improvements (closes: Bug#69161) * Adam Di Carlo: - Makefile: fix the localfiles rule, which was breaking in some instances; fix mirror-to-master rule in documentation/Makefile - Maintainers: credit Bill Bennet, The ComputerHelperGuy

boot-floppies 2.2.21 released

2001-03-22 Thread Adam Di Carlo
I decided to release and upload 2.2.21 even though we know we're going to want to do a boot-floppies 2.2.22 for i386 at least for newer 2.2.19pre17 kernels. Please test this out. It's probably most convenient to grab it from http://people.debian.org/~aph/current/>. I'm really only considering c

Re: boot-floppies 2.2.21 released

2001-03-22 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, Mar 22, 2001 at 02:47:28AM -0500, Adam Di Carlo wrote: > > > > I decided to release and upload 2.2.21 even though we know we're going > > to want to do a boot-floppies 2.2.22 for i386 at least for newer >

boot-floppies 2.2.25 with i386 2.2.19 upgrade

2001-05-13 Thread Adam Di Carlo
If possible, could someone please test the unofficial version of boot-floppies 2.2.25? This version is only different in that it is using kernel 2.2.19 for i386. Since the kernel changed, what I need is for someone to test *every* one of the 4 flavors, ensuring that the modules all work (depmod

Re: where are uptodate boot disk images for woody

2001-05-29 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Current 2.3.4 i386 boot-floppies for woody testing (qualified testers only please) are available at http://people.debian.org/~aph/debian/dists/woody/main/disks-i386/current/ Good luck. Results to debian-boot or against the boot-floppies (or base-config, or debootstrap, or whatever package) p

boot-floppies 2.2.5 (potato) ready for testing

2001-06-07 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Boot-Floppies 2.2.25 for Potato i386 has been built and I would like to get some testing on it. It is available at http://people.debian.org/~aph/debian/dists/potato/main/disks-i386/2.2.25-2001-07-07/ Please keep in mind that we are working almost solely on woody now, so I'm really only intereste

critical problems in 2.3.5 prevent release

2001-06-08 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Well, on powerpc at least, the "configure base" step is getting skipped by default. This leads to lack of /etc/fstab and other evil conditions. on booting into my new system, I didn't have the right inittab in place; it gave me the "true" inittab instead I have uploaded i386 and powerpc images

boot-floppies 2.3.5 ready for testing (i386 and powerpc so far)

2001-06-12 Thread Adam Di Carlo
n Owsiany: - making sure that i18n code is included, moving over to stuff moved from CVS to their own packages * Adam Di Carlo - the logic to build a modules tarball for given root disk was a little messed up on non-i386, partly due to some schizophrenia in either rootdis

Re: successful installation with 2.3.5 boot-floppies

2001-06-12 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Anthony Towns writes: > On Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 12:04:49PM -0600, Matt Kraai wrote: > I was under the impression the boot-floppy disks were being based on > packages in sid (busybox, debootstrap, etc) and used to install packages > from woody (dpkg.deb, bash.deb, libc6.deb, etc). This still seems

Re: successful installation with 2.3.5 boot-floppies

2001-06-13 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Erik Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue Jun 12, 2001 at 08:37:21PM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote: > > > > > they're allowed to have special instructions that you have to carry out > > > very precisely ("Switch to VC 2, type this confusing sed c

boot-floppies 3.0.7 i386 for testing

2001-07-02 Thread Adam Di Carlo
i [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.onshored.com/> boot-floppies (3.0.7) unstable; urgency=low * Adam Di Carlo - doc, i386: point to documentation on how to invoke more bioses closes: #88080 - woody is going to be 3.0, rather than 2.3; bump package version for boot-floppie

Re: Install Report (b-f 3.x ia64; cdrom/net; standard)

2001-07-22 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Randolph Chung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Everything more or less worked; one glitch is that I had configured > static network support, but after the reboot a dhcp client started up > and overwrote my static IP and DNS settings. Ethan Benson reported this as well. This is very bad, the bugs h

Re: Install Report (b-f 3.x ia64; cdrom/net; standard)

2001-07-23 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Richard Hirst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I tried dhcp-client 3.0 beta from experimental on hppa, and it > fixed this problem. Size is likely to be a problem though. For > hppa, version 2 is 123K, version 3 is 519K. On ia64 the version 3 > binary was 1.6M, but I assume that was due to some bu

woody boot-floppies 3.0.9 i386 for testing

2001-08-07 Thread Adam Di Carlo
c user to test it. Nobody dared... * Henning Heinold - mips fixing libfdisk for mips (patch from Guido Guenther) - mips adding dvhtool (patch from Guido Guenther) * Stefan Gybas - Initial S/390 support (not working yet) * Adam Di Carlo: - help the library reduction be bett

3.0.10 for powerpc ready for testing

2001-08-10 Thread Adam Di Carlo
I've put up 3.0.10 for powerpc at http://people.debian.org/~aph/dists/woody/... Please take a look at that. I'm now going to rebuild again for as many arches as I can with the new library reduction stuff. -- ...Adam Di Carlo..<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...http://www.onshored.com/>

pcmcia in boot-floppies

2001-08-11 Thread Adam Di Carlo
I will get to that install attempt > tonight. (I've had troubles with the 3.0.8 disks on this box too) I'm sure you'll find your results to be the same. Obviously, fixing PCMCIA is going to be the next thing to do. If anyone here on debian-boot can take a whack at it I would appreciate it. -- ...Adam Di Carlo..<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...http://www.onshored.com/>

boot-floppies 3.0.12 for i386 ready for testing (PCMCIA)

2001-08-20 Thread Adam Di Carlo
t immediately with a source/binary upload for i386 (and PowerPC perhaps, although I think there are some kernel issues remaining there). Below is the changes so far since 3.0.11. -- ...Adam Di Carlo..<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...http://www.onshored.com/> boot-floppies (3.0.12) unstable;

Re: [Timesheet-devel] [Jordi Mallach ] Re: remaining FHS bugs

2001-08-31 Thread Adam Di Carlo
; > He said he'd be willing to give CVS access to people who want to fix > this package. It has a nice list of bugs right now. > Anyone? All RC bugs should be fixed now, I think, but I may have created some more. -- ...Adam Di Carlo..<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...http://www.onshored.com/>

boot-floppies 3.0.14 available for testing (i386 and powerpc)

2001-09-16 Thread Adam Di Carlo
now of a PowerPC build issue, since it doesn't build stock yet) - does PCMCIA work ? Any reports, comments, or replies should go to debian-boot@lists.debian.org since we don't monitor the testing and QA lists. Your assistance will help us turn around 3.0.14 faster. -- ...Adam

Re: 3.0.14 boot floppies, 3.0.13 too

2001-09-23 Thread Adam Di Carlo
same with both the 3.0.13 and 3.0.14 boot floppies. > > It appears that the pcmcia link from /etc/init.d has not been placed in the > rc2.d directory. I think this really should be corrected before we try to > release this stuff! My NMU of dhcp-client I did should fix this problem.

3.0.17 source and binary uploaded

2001-11-14 Thread Adam Di Carlo
gt;. Please let us know at debian-boot@lists.debian.org if that's ok. -- ...Adam Di Carlo..<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...http://www.onshored.com/>

boot-floppies 3.0.18 i386 (i18n,powerpc) available for testing

2001-11-21 Thread Adam Di Carlo
a bunch of languages which aren't available on the disk - modconf is well broken: /target/usr/sbin/modconf: cannot create /dev/tty: no such device or addess local release_notes.en: bad variable name I'd like to find out if there are any other bad bugs. Please email results to . --

new testing version of b-f

2001-12-04 Thread Adam Di Carlo
, particularly blocking issues, at [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- ...Adam Di Carlo..<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...http://www.onshored.com/>

flashing screen, 3.0.18 blocked

2001-12-06 Thread Adam Di Carlo
> But maybe something else is wrong on my setup. No I get the same thing. This is definately blocking. I think I may have to turn off i18n to get this working again. Or else is there any fix for this? Wasn't this the libnewt issue? -- ...Adam Di Carlo..<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...http://www.onshored.com/>

3.0.18 testing

2001-12-09 Thread Adam Di Carlo
erPC images or not; I'd like to but obviously it's gotta function first ... :) -- ...Adam Di Carlo..<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...http://www.onshored.com/>

3.0.18 testing needed

2001-12-15 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Filing bugs against 'boot-floppies', 'base-config', 'busybox', the kernel, etc are also ok. -- ...Adam Di Carlo..<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...http://www.onshored.com/>

Re: 3.0.18 testing needed

2001-12-15 Thread Adam Di Carlo
FYI, here's the full changelog for 3.0.18, if that helps for testers. -- ...Adam Di Carlo..<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...http://www.onshored.com/> boot-floppies (3.0.18) unstable; urgency=low * we are still building against unstable since there some things there that we need

Re: 3.0.18 testing needed

2001-12-15 Thread Adam Di Carlo
FYI, my preliminary testing indicates that the i18n flavors are working ok, but the vanilla flavor (not-i18n) has got the flashing screen on my version. Blah. Still got something need to fix there. -- ...Adam Di Carlo..<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...http://www.onshored.com/>

Re: 3.0.18 testing needed

2001-12-15 Thread Adam Di Carlo
"Sean 'Shaleh' Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Will you add i18n for jp? Or do they build special bf anyways? Just curious. The i18n builds do include Japanese support. Is that what you were asking about? -- ...Adam Di Carlo..<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...http://www.onshored.com/>

Re: boot-floppies 3.0.18 i386 (i18n,powerpc) available for testing

2001-12-18 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Adam Di Carlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I have a new testing version of the internationalized 3.0.18 > boot-floppies for i386 and powerpc. > > http://people.debian.org/~aph/debian/dists/woody/main/> This has just been updated for i386. We have a known problem where

Re: How to make things change - need some help

2002-01-07 Thread Adam Di Carlo
> when bochs ITP gets updated, but I may not want to watch every wnpp > bug :) > > All in all though, very cool :) Hello, why was I (as developers-reference maintainer) included here? If there's something you want added to the developers-reference, please just file a bug, that's the best way. Thanks. -- ...Adam Di Carlo..<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...http://www.onshored.com/>

new boot-floppies for testing

2002-04-02 Thread Adam Di Carlo
again, not official, apparently BenC has a new kernel preparing for that). Please file bugs if you find problems that are not already filed as bugs already. That's the only way we can track and prioritize issues. -- ...Adam Di Carlo..<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...http://www.onshore

things I suggest testing in boot-floppies

2002-04-09 Thread Adam Di Carlo
up, retarded way we check whether the driver disk is the right disk. Bugs here would go against boot-floppies . -- ...Adam Di Carlo..<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...http://www.onshored.com/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Upstream maintainers are sleeping (Was: Reviving Debian QA

1999-03-29 Thread Adam Di Carlo
> "Stephane" == Stephane Bortzmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Stephane> On Monday 29 March 1999, at 1 h 17, the keyboard of Adam Di Stephane> Carlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> * check that patches that should be sent upstream are being sent >> upstream -- I think this is very important a

Bug#39166: application/mac-binhex40 mailcap handler doesn't do the right thing

1999-06-08 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Package: macutils Version: 2.0b3-7 The mailcap entry for 'application/mac-binhex40', added by macutils postinst, is application/mac-binhex40; /usr/bin/hexbin '%s'; needsterminal; \ description=BinHex encoded Macintosh file; nametemplate=%s.hqx For one, that should be 'hexbin -v' instead

Re: Your offer regarding bug #28704

1999-09-29 Thread Adam Di Carlo
[please retain CC to bts] >Quoting your bugreport at http://bugs.debian.org/28704: > >> I volunteer to do NMUs for SGML packages to help the transition... >Would you indeed do this? I would like to do it but I have no >knowledge of SGML and do not use the packages. I think it should be >done by

remember -- file RC bugs against base pkgs when appropriate

1999-11-12 Thread Adam Di Carlo
I'd like to remind all the hackers here that it is *critical* to file RC bugs against broken stuff in base which isn't working the way it should. Unfortunately we are front line testers for the base system since no one in the real work really runs base-only systems. There is a *lot* of stuff sti

request that base gets testing by test groups

1999-11-18 Thread Adam Di Carlo
As you may know, at this point, boot-floppies itself is not yet alpha-ready. However, I do think we can proceeding on significant testing of the base system itself, apart from the boot-floppies. 'base', as you may know, is the set of packages or even partial packages built by the boot-floppies.

Re: data-dumper missing? (Re: request that base gets testing by test groups

1999-11-18 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Le Thu, Nov 18, 1999 at 12:55:46PM +0100, Stephane Bortzmeyer écrivait: > > > A script with "use POSIX" will fail. > > > > OK, it means POSIX is not in perl-base. > > No, POSIX is in perl-5.005-base. But some files (autosplit.ix at least) > are missi