Bug#1092608: marked as done (vcswatch wrongly claims dpkg Git repository is > 500 MiB)

Your message dated Thu, 9 Jan 2025 22:01:21 +0100 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#1092608: vcswatch wrongly claims dpkg Git repository is > 500 MiB has caused the Debian Bug report #1092608, regarding vcswatch wrongly claims dpkg Git repository is > 500 MiB to be marked as done. This me

Bug#1072498: marked as done (qa.debian.org: vcswatch fails to update dpkg repo due to size limit)

Your message dated Thu, 9 Jan 2025 22:01:21 +0100 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#1092608: vcswatch wrongly claims dpkg Git repository is > 500 MiB has caused the Debian Bug report #1092608, regarding qa.debian.org: vcswatch fails to update dpkg repo due to size limit to be marked as don

Processed: I was not paying adequate attention

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # I was so excited about finding another report of the same bug, I didn't > # check if this one had already been reported. > merge 1092608 1072498 Bug #1092608 [qa.debian.org] vcswatch wrongly claims dpkg Git repository is > 500 MiB Bug #1072498

Bug#1092608: vcswatch wrongly claims dpkg Git repository is > 500 MiB

Package: qa.debian.org According to : Error: Repository size 561401856 exceeds 500 MiB, blocking it But a fresh clone of the cited repository is only 102 MiB, or 63 MiB without a working copy: wraith:/tmp$ git clone https://git.dpkg.org/gi

Stats on packages not on Salsa (Was: Bits from DPL)

Hi Stuart, changing subject and suggest moving the topic to Debian QA list where it probably belongs. Am Thu, Jan 09, 2025 at 11:54:47AM +1100 schrieb Stuart Prescott: > Good point on anonscm as well... that really does blow out the numbers. Unfortunately yes. > However... some of them still w

Re: criteria for acceptable languages for central QA tools in Debian (was: Re: coordination between lintian/piuparts/adequate)

On Wed, Jan 08, 2025 at 08:22:22PM -0800, Otto Kekäläinen wrote: > There have been discussions about adding adequate to Salsa CI and run > it by default as part of the piuparts job. If you are now preparing to > have adequate by default in piuparts, then it would make sense to have > it by default

Re: criteria for acceptable languages for central QA tools in Debian (was: Re: coordination between lintian/piuparts/adequate)

On Wed, Jan 08, 2025 at 09:11:02PM +0100, Serafeim (Serafi) Zanikolas wrote: > hi Holger, as you have addressed me here and... > On Wed Jan 8, 2025 at 11:57 AM CET, Holger Levsen wrote: > > (actually adequate is run on many more binary packages on piuparts.d.o, > > because > > p.d.o is not only