Re: coordination between lintian/piuparts/adequate

2024-12-11 Thread Serafeim (Serafi) Zanikolas
hi Holger, thanks for the feedback. On Wed Dec 11, 2024 at 11:15 AM CET, Holger Levsen wrote: > On Tue, Dec 10, 2024 at 09:38:57PM +0100, Serafeim (Serafi) Zanikolas wrote: > > > Probably adequate is the logical place for this test, but adequate > > > doesn't build/run on ports architectures since

criteria for acceptable languages for central QA tools in Debian (was: Re: coordination between lintian/piuparts/adequate)

2024-12-11 Thread Serafeim (Serafi) Zanikolas
[forking to -devel] On Wed Dec 11, 2024 at 11:15 AM CET, Holger Levsen wrote: > On Tue, Dec 10, 2024 at 09:38:57PM +0100, Serafeim (Serafi) Zanikolas wrote: > > > On Sat Dec 7, 2024 at 5:15 AM CET, Paul Wise wrote: > > > Probably adequate is the logical place for this test, but adequate > > > does

Re: coordination between lintian/piuparts/adequate

2024-12-11 Thread Holger Levsen
On Tue, Dec 10, 2024 at 09:38:57PM +0100, Serafeim (Serafi) Zanikolas wrote: > > Probably adequate is the logical place for this test, but adequate > > doesn't build/run on ports architectures since it moved to golang, > > so piuparts should probably keep its tests on those arches until > > adequat

Re: criteria for acceptable languages for central QA tools in Debian (was: Re: coordination between lintian/piuparts/adequate)

2024-12-11 Thread Otto Kekäläinen
Hi, > [forking to -devel] > > On Wed Dec 11, 2024 at 11:15 AM CET, Holger Levsen wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 10, 2024 at 09:38:57PM +0100, Serafeim (Serafi) Zanikolas wrote: > > > > On Sat Dec 7, 2024 at 5:15 AM CET, Paul Wise wrote: > > > > Probably adequate is the logical place for this test, but ade