Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: udd
The UDD list of BTS binary packages for the PTS started outputting some
incorrect package names. I am not sure if these are caused by bad data
in the BTS itself or if something has broken in the UDD datab
On 18/09/2023 17:30, Paul Wise wrote:
$ curl -sL https://udd.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugs-binpkgs-pts.cgi | grep -vP
'^(?:src:)?[-a-z0-9.+]+ [0-9]+ [0-9]+ [0-9]+ [0-9]+ [0-9]+$'
115.2.0esr-1severity: 0 1 0 0 0
criticalupdate 0 1 0 0 0
firefox-esr version: 0 1 0 0 0
Your message dated Mon, 18 Sep 2023 20:57:54 +0800
with message-id <574179004a4f68c5b39200538b321fc1cb44cda3.ca...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#1052146: UDD: broken data from bugs-binpkgs-pts CGI
script
has caused the Debian Bug report #1052146,
regarding UDD: broken data from bugs-binpkgs
Adafruit CircuitPython
latest
API AND USAGE
Core Modules
Standard Libraries
Supported Ports
Troubleshooting
Adafruit CircuitPython Libraries
CircuitPython Library Bundles
Workflows
Environment Variables
DESIGN AND PORTING REFERENCE
Design Guide
Architecture
Porting
Adding *io support to other po
4 matches
Mail list logo