Re: svn false positives (was ... (mass) svn-to-git migration)

2023-02-06 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Sat, Feb 04, 2023 at 12:52:23AM +0100, Diederik de Haas wrote: > I searched that list and checked a few of them ... and they all seem to be on > salsa already. What's the best way to deal with those? Since the authoritative data is what's in the Sources file, I'd say please upload the packages

Re: svn false positives (was ... (mass) svn-to-git migration)

2023-02-06 Thread Diederik de Haas
On Monday, 6 February 2023 11:41:15 CET Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > > I searched that list and checked a few of them ... and they all seem to be > > on salsa already. What's the best way to deal with those? > > Since the authoritative data is what's in the Sources file, I'd say > please upload the pac

a remark about https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/index_issues.html

2023-02-06 Thread Patrice Duroux
Hi, I would have helped more but looking in the source code of jenkins.debian.net, I could not understand why the 'Tested suite' list is sorted differently than in the other pages. Regards, Patrice

Bug#1030734: link to upstream bug tracker and repository

2023-02-06 Thread Jelmer Vernooij
Package: tracker.debian.org Severity: wishlist A large number of Debian packages now has upstream metadata, including links to upstream repositories (Repository-Browse) and bugtrackers (Bug-Database / Bug-Submit). Would it be possible to link to those from tracker?