(Adding debian-qa@ to Cc to broaden the discussion a bit)
Hi,
On the issue of lintian.d.n/lintian.d.o/UDD/tracker.d.o, I wonder if the
separation of concerns is the right one.
I think that in Debian, we would aim for a better separation between:
A/ QA tools development, focused on getting the g
Hi Lucas,
TL;DR please find one idea to solve your issue below
> provide the current
> status of the archive against the current version of lintian as
> something parsable
Just for lintian.d.n (which is about to be transferred to
lintian.d.o), that is exactly what we provide. It just won't be on
2 matches
Mail list logo
