Re: [UDD] Is there any information about failed autopkgtest in UDD?

2020-05-02 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Lucas, On Fri, May 01, 2020 at 10:57:39PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > I fixed it and added the same suites as you were, reverted your changes > and dropped the autopkgtest table. So everything should be fine. Thanks for this. > Sorry for not following closely enough when you started to wo

Re: [UDD] Is there any information about failed autopkgtest in UDD?

2020-05-02 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 02/05/20 at 09:37 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Lucas, > > On Fri, May 01, 2020 at 10:57:39PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > I fixed it and added the same suites as you were, reverted your changes > > and dropped the autopkgtest table. So everything should be fine. > > Thanks for this. >

Re: [UDD] Is there any information about failed autopkgtest in UDD?

2020-05-02 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Lucas, please forget my question - I simply missed the '--run' option. Sorry for the noise, Andreas. On Sat, May 02, 2020 at 09:37:43AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Lucas, > > On Fri, May 01, 2020 at 10:57:39PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > I fixed it and added the same suites as you

Bug#955268: udd watch: "429 too many requests" from GitHub

2020-05-02 Thread Xavier
Le 01/05/2020 à 22:40, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit : > Hi > > Unfortunately, the fix in devscripts 2.20.3 doesn't work, because watch > files don't use the GitHub API, but rather URLs such as > https://github.com/osallou/cassiopee-c/tags > > So different rate limiting rules apply, and authenticating u

Bug#955434: tracker.d.o: please integrate information from buildinfos.debian.net

2020-05-02 Thread Holger Levsen
On Wed, Apr 01, 2020 at 02:52:27AM +, Paul Wise wrote: > It sounds like something like this is what is wanted in the links panel? > > buildd: logs, ... href="https://buildinfos.debian.net/buildinfo-pool/libf/libfakekey/"; > title=".buildinfo files for official builds">info yes, that would be