Re: [UDD] Is there any information about failed autopkgtest in UDD?

2020-04-16 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi Andreas, On 15-04-2020 22:45, Andreas Tille wrote: > autodep8-python3 PASS (superficial) superficial is translated to neutral. As is FAIL (flaky). Paul signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [UDD] Is there any information about failed autopkgtest in UDD?

2020-04-16 Thread Andreas Tille
On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 09:32:43AM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: > Hi Andreas, > > On 15-04-2020 22:45, Andreas Tille wrote: > > autodep8-python3 PASS (superficial) > > superficial is translated to neutral. As is FAIL (flaky). H, what exactly means "superficial". Are all those Testsuite

Re: [UDD] Is there any information about failed autopkgtest in UDD?

2020-04-16 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi Andreas, On 16-04-2020 10:09, Andreas Tille wrote: >> superficial is translated to neutral. As is FAIL (flaky). > > H, what exactly means "superficial". Please read the documentation: https://salsa.debian.org/ci-team/autopkgtest/raw/master/doc/README.package-tests.rst > Are all those >

Re: [UDD] Is there any information about failed autopkgtest in UDD?

2020-04-16 Thread Simon McVittie
On Thu, 16 Apr 2020 at 10:09:36 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > H, what exactly means "superficial". Originally proposed in: https://salsa.debian.org/ci-team/autopkgtest/-/merge_requests/19 Implemented in: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=904979 The design was originally calle

Re: [UDD] Is there any information about failed autopkgtest in UDD?

2020-04-16 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Paul, On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 10:30:17AM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: > > H, what exactly means "superficial". > > Please read the documentation: > https://salsa.debian.org/ci-team/autopkgtest/raw/master/doc/README.package-tests.rst Thanks for this pointer. > > Are all those > >Testsui

Re: [UDD] Is there any information about failed autopkgtest in UDD?

2020-04-16 Thread gregor herrmann
On Thu, 16 Apr 2020 09:56:15 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: > > Are all those > > > >Testsuite: autopkgtest-pkg-* > > > > superficial? > > Most of them yes, because if they fail, that's Very Bad, but if they > succeed, they don't give us a whole lot of confidence that the package > works as