Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
Hi!
The buildd status on qa.debian.org shows individual architectures using
colors and symbols such as ⎇ ∉ ✔ ✘ ∿. Alas, these symbols are arranged
by arch name, without grouping into release and non-release archs. This
means, it is not obvious at a glanc
On 6/11/19 7:46 PM, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 11 Jun 2019, Herbert Fortes wrote:
>> I put everything inside a chroot jail and run tox. Selenium worked after
>> 'xhost' command. But there is a problem.
>>
>> Have I done something wrong?
>
> I don't know... you don't show a lot of
On Wed, 12 Jun 2019, Herbert Fortes wrote:
> - tox | tee log.txt
>http://paste.debian.net/1087635/
Ah, those errors are unrelated to the functional tests. This is a
requirement of the multiprocessing module, it needs to have working
semaphore support and for this you need to have /dev/shm mou
On 6/12/19 4:27 PM, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Jun 2019, Herbert Fortes wrote:
>> - tox | tee log.txt
>>http://paste.debian.net/1087635/
>
> Ah, those errors are unrelated to the functional tests. This is a
> requirement of the multiprocessing module, it needs to have working
> semap
On 6/12/19 4:27 PM, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Jun 2019, Herbert Fortes wrote:
>> - tox | tee log.txt
>>http://paste.debian.net/1087635/
>
> Ah, those errors are unrelated to the functional tests. This is a
> requirement of the multiprocessing module, it needs to have working
> semap
On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 8:30 PM Adam Borowski wrote:
> Thus, could you please put all release archs first, -ports later?
I'd suggest also greying out the non-release arches somehow, similar
to what buildd.debian.org does but perhaps greying out the status
symbols instead.
--
bye,
pabs
https://
6 matches
Mail list logo
