Bug#898554: fakeupstream.cgi: please stop redirecting Adacore website

> > The redirector for AdaCore packages is hard to maintain > > (their website uses various indirections and hashes, the format changes > > many times a year) > > for a very small benefit (they release exactly once a year). > > Please consider the attached patch and remove the related stanza. >

Re: What to do with the "Upstream info" links in the PTS and the packages-metadata branch in collab-qa ?

On Tue, May 08, 2018 at 06:02:36PM +1000, Stuart Prescott wrote: > Are there any other consumers of these files? Definitely. > If there are no longer any consumers, should we really be nagging > maintainers to include them? > > $ lintian-info --list-tags | grep upstream-metadata > upstream-met

Re: What to do with the "Upstream info" links in the PTS and the packages-metadata branch in collab-qa ?

Hi Paul, On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 01:46:46PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > > > The Debian Med team includes upstream information from these files > > in its "tasks" pages (see > > for example), using the UDD as a gatherer. > > This is using upstream-metadata.

Re: What to do with the "Upstream info" links in the PTS and the packages-metadata branch in collab-qa ?

On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 3:01 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 01:46:46PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: >> This is using upstream-metadata.debian.net, seems like it will need >> updating if a replacement shows up. > > I can not parse this? The UDD gatherer is not using > upstream-metada