Re: [PATCH] Exclude .tox, distro_tracker/vendor, and docs/conf.py from flake8

Hello, On Tue, 19 Dec 2017, Ville Skyttä wrote: > I see a bunch of errors related to use of bare except there. Full list Yes, me too. Those appeared recently. > Subject: [PATCH] Exclude .tox and docs/conf.py from flake8 > > --- > tox.ini | 2 +- Merged your patch. On Tue, 19 Dec 2017, Paul Wi

buildd chroot creation: who should get notified of failures?

Hi folks, Occasionally the buildd (and porterboxen) fail to debootstrap updated chroots. Sometimes these are Internet problems, sometimes local network problems, sometimes mirror problems, sometimes archive problems. These mails go to DSA but as far as I can tell, we always ignore them, I certain

packages that FTBFS twice in a row ...

Hi, here are my observations after analyzing a few pbuilder --twice failures in experimental. I only did full (source+arch+indep) builds. The command sequence being tested is roughly: 1. debian/rules clean 2. dpkg-source 3. debian/rules build binary 4. debian/rules clean 5. dpkg-source 6. debia

Re: packages that FTBFS twice in a row ...

On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 12:14 PM, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > How could we check for these bugs? I guess the archive-wide rebuilds should be the location for this. https://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/ArchiveTesting IIRC Lucas used to do semi-regular testing of this. > I think the interesting f