Hi,
On 19/07/17 at 23:29 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> So, I propose that we remove from the archive all packages that:
> were in unstable at the time of the jessie freeze
> AND
> were not in jessie at the time of the release
> AND
> where in unstable at the time of the stretch freeze
> AND
On 29/05/17 at 08:12 -0400, James McCoy wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 03:09:55PM -0400, James McCoy wrote:
> > On Nov 1, 2016 11:33, "Lucas Nussbaum" wrote:
> > > I tried with the first package listed. It works fine with devscripts
> > > 2.16.8 (in testing), but not with 2.16.4~bpo8+1 (in stab
Hi Helge,
On 12/11/16 at 15:48 +0100, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> Package: qa.debian.org
> Severity: normal
>
> https://packages.qa.debian.org/l/linuxinfo.html
I'm not sure where the old PTS gets its uscan information, but:
- it's OK on tracker.debian.org
- it's also OK on UDD's DMD: https://udd.d
Your message dated Sun, 6 Aug 2017 10:56:37 -0400
with message-id <20170806145637.ep6c76c3hbvvg...@xanadu.blop.info>
and subject line Re: Bug#842829: UDD/uscan: devscripts needs to be upgraded to
avoid some failures
has caused the Debian Bug report #842829,
regarding UDD/uscan: devscripts needs to
Hi,
On 05/02/17 at 01:13 +0100, Raphaël Halimi wrote:
> Package: qa.debian.org
> Severity: minor
> User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: udd
>
> Hi,
>
> The lines which display version numbers for backports have twice the
> height of other lines. Looking at the source code for the
Your message dated Sun, 6 Aug 2017 12:26:27 -0400
with message-id <20170806162627.kqpgphmtzobc6...@xanadu.blop.info>
and subject line Re: Bug#863592: UDD should use https for links
has caused the Debian Bug report #863592,
regarding UDD should use https for links
to be marked as done.
This means t
Your message dated Sun, 6 Aug 2017 13:10:54 -0400
with message-id <20170806171054.wytoaewtyczqs...@xanadu.blop.info>
and subject line Re: Bug#854200: udd: useless tag before backports version
numbers
has caused the Debian Bug report #854200,
regarding udd: useless tag before backports version nu
Package: jadetex
Version: 3.13-17
Severity: normal
Hi,
jadetex package description says it's a transitional package (in stretch and
upwards), yet it still contains stuff and not mere meta data.
I guess the proper cause of action would be to remove the package from sid.
--
cheers,
Holg
8 matches
Mail list logo