Re: mass-removing packages that missed both jessie and stretch?

2017-08-06 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Hi, On 19/07/17 at 23:29 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > So, I propose that we remove from the archive all packages that: > were in unstable at the time of the jessie freeze > AND > were not in jessie at the time of the release > AND > where in unstable at the time of the stretch freeze > AND

Re: Bug#842829: UDD/uscan: devscripts needs to be upgraded to avoid some failures

2017-08-06 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 29/05/17 at 08:12 -0400, James McCoy wrote: > On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 03:09:55PM -0400, James McCoy wrote: > > On Nov 1, 2016 11:33, "Lucas Nussbaum" wrote: > > > I tried with the first package listed.  It works fine with devscripts > > > 2.16.8 (in testing), but not with 2.16.4~bpo8+1 (in stab

Bug#844106: qa.debian.org: Says uscan failed, however, it works (for linuxinfo)

2017-08-06 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Hi Helge, On 12/11/16 at 15:48 +0100, Helge Kreutzmann wrote: > Package: qa.debian.org > Severity: normal > > https://packages.qa.debian.org/l/linuxinfo.html I'm not sure where the old PTS gets its uscan information, but: - it's OK on tracker.debian.org - it's also OK on UDD's DMD: https://udd.d

Bug#842829: marked as done (UDD/uscan: devscripts needs to be upgraded to avoid some failures)

2017-08-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 6 Aug 2017 10:56:37 -0400 with message-id <20170806145637.ep6c76c3hbvvg...@xanadu.blop.info> and subject line Re: Bug#842829: UDD/uscan: devscripts needs to be upgraded to avoid some failures has caused the Debian Bug report #842829, regarding UDD/uscan: devscripts needs to

Bug#854200: udd: useless tag before backports version numbers

2017-08-06 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Hi, On 05/02/17 at 01:13 +0100, Raphaël Halimi wrote: > Package: qa.debian.org > Severity: minor > User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: udd > > Hi, > > The lines which display version numbers for backports have twice the > height of other lines. Looking at the source code for the

Bug#863592: marked as done (UDD should use https for links)

2017-08-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 6 Aug 2017 12:26:27 -0400 with message-id <20170806162627.kqpgphmtzobc6...@xanadu.blop.info> and subject line Re: Bug#863592: UDD should use https for links has caused the Debian Bug report #863592, regarding UDD should use https for links to be marked as done. This means t

Bug#854200: marked as done (udd: useless tag before backports version numbers)

2017-08-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 6 Aug 2017 13:10:54 -0400 with message-id <20170806171054.wytoaewtyczqs...@xanadu.blop.info> and subject line Re: Bug#854200: udd: useless tag before backports version numbers has caused the Debian Bug report #854200, regarding udd: useless tag before backports version nu

Bug#871021: jadetex: transitional package since stretch and containing stuff

2017-08-06 Thread Holger Levsen
Package: jadetex Version: 3.13-17 Severity: normal Hi, jadetex package description says it's a transitional package (in stretch and upwards), yet it still contains stuff and not mere meta data. I guess the proper cause of action would be to remove the package from sid. -- cheers, Holg