sending ci.debian.net/debci traffic here?

2014-01-29 Thread Antonio Terceiro
Hello there, I am considering to point ci.debian.net/debci traffic to debian-qa (both mailing list and IRC). It will be mostly me answering in the beginning anyway, but at least it doesn't stay in private. Any objections? -- Antonio Terceiro signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#737048: udd: import CVE identifiers from secure-testing SVN

2014-01-29 Thread Helmut Grohne
Package: qa.debian.org Severity: wishlist User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: udd X-Debbugs-CC: debian-secur...@lists.debian.org It would be nice to have UDD import parts of the secure-testing SVN repository maintained by the Debian security team. The biggest benefit I see is that it

Bug#737048: udd: import CVE identifiers from secure-testing SVN

2014-01-29 Thread Henri Salo
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 06:58:28PM +0100, Helmut Grohne wrote: > * Is a given CVE identifier an NFU? And why? > * Which packages are associated with a given CVE identifier? > * Which bugs are associated with a given CVE identifier? > (*) Which version of a given package was a given CVE identi

debian/control files: Identical maintainer and uploaders

2014-01-29 Thread Simon Kainz
Hi! After grepping around in Sources.gz on my favorite mirror, I found the following: Package:colo Maintainer: Martin Michlmayr Uploaders: Martin Michlmayr , Peter 'p2' De Schrijver Package:extra-xdg-menus Maintainer: Peter Clifton Uploaders: Peter Clifton , Hamish Moffatt

Re: debian/control files: Identical maintainer and uploaders

2014-01-29 Thread Dr . Torge Szczepanek
Hello! > Package:openvpn-auth-radius > Maintainer: Cygnus Networks GmbH > Uploaders: Dr. Torge Szczepanek > > > So what's the idea in having the same person ("same" in this context means > same email address) in both Maintainer: and Uploaders: field? Some leftovers > from someone's tran

Re: sending ci.debian.net/debci traffic here?

2014-01-29 Thread Paul Wise
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 9:27 PM, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > Any objections? Sounds good to me. I think it is best to maintain QA infra collaboratively to increase continuity in case of burnout or busyness. You might want to move the git repository to one of the qa, collab-qa or collab-maint alioth

Bug#737048: udd: import CVE identifiers from secure-testing SVN

2014-01-29 Thread Helmut Grohne
Control: merge 660170 -1 This is a duplicate. Sorry for the noise. Helmut -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20140130061929.GA31391@localhost

Processed: Re: udd: import CVE identifiers from secure-testing SVN

2014-01-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > merge 660170 -1 Bug #660170 [qa.debian.org] qa.debian.org: please import security information from the security tracker Bug #737048 [qa.debian.org] udd: import CVE identifiers from secure-testing SVN Merged 660170 737048 -- 660170: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/b

Re: debian/control files: Identical maintainer and uploaders

2014-01-29 Thread Paul Wise
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 4:41 AM, Simon Kainz wrote: > So what's the idea in having the same person ("same" in this context means > same email address) in both Maintainer: and Uploaders: field? Some leftovers > from someone's transition from DM to DD? Or maybe a workaround to fix some > issues conc

Re: debian/control files: Identical maintainer and uploaders

2014-01-29 Thread Niels Thykier
On 2014-01-30 07:25, Paul Wise wrote: > On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 4:41 AM, Simon Kainz wrote: > >> So what's the idea in having the same person ("same" in this context means >> same email address) in both Maintainer: and Uploaders: field? Some leftovers >> from someone's transition from DM to DD? Or